Re: LyX with Google Wave?

Missing multiple X displays is not the problem as having them would not lead to a cross-platform solution including native Windows (i.e. without X server) and Mac. I can imagine a possible solution along the lines of separate processes communicating over the network using something like the

Re: Bug with possible data loss: unwanted package use?

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 02:40:46PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Guenter Milde mi...@users.berlios.de writes: I am surprised that this bug has not been identified earlier. If I am not mixing up something, it is http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/5530 LyX expansion in math-macro

Re: Bug with possible data loss: unwanted package use?

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 02:43:16AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: It is not that easy. When I send my file to other who don't have LyX 1.6.4 the file doesn't work while we promise that all files in a stable release series. When we would have added this only to LyX 2.0 we would be able to

Re: [patch] new layout file for the tufte-book document class

Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: Uwe Stöhr wrote: This doesn't help. You can still enable hyperref in the document style dialog. When you do this LyX wouldn't load hyperref in the preamble with \usepackage{hyperref} but the \hypersetup remains and effects the options for tufte's

Re: r31789 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:24:03PM +0100, for...@lyx.org wrote: Author: forenr Date: Thu Oct 29 14:24:02 2009 New Revision: 31789 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31789 Log: Better fix for bug #6270. The outer braces are swallowed only for user defined macros, so better use a brace

Re: [patch] new layout file for the tufte-book document class

Uwe Stöhr schrieb: I now only cleaned up the tufte-handout.layout since it is exactly the same as the tufte-book.layout, with the only difference that article.layout is loaded. Jürgen, I hope it was OK to do this also directly in branch. It was not. I think I forgot to mark part and part*

Server Painfully Slow

At least the web part. Can anyone try to do something about this? rh

Re: Bug with possible data loss: unwanted package use?

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:20:57PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I would be curious to see how big the overhaul would be. It turned out to be not so big. The attached patch fixes the problem for me. -- Enrico Index: src/mathed/InsetMathGrid.cpp

Undo gives warning

Every undo action now gives a warning that there is no open group. Vincent

Re: r31793 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

v...@lyx.org wrote: Author: vfr Date: Thu Oct 29 23:08:05 2009 New Revision: 31793 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31793 Log: Text3.cpp: fix unintended fall-throughs. Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Text3.cpp Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Text3.cpp

Re: r31793 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Pavel Sanda schreef: v...@lyx.org wrote: Author: vfr Date: Thu Oct 29 23:08:05 2009 New Revision: 31793 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31793 Log: Text3.cpp: fix unintended fall-throughs. Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Text3.cpp Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Text3.cpp

Re: Bug with possible data loss: unwanted package use?

Note that the addition of mhchem was adding a new feature not a bug fix. I use \ce and mhchem successfully also with LyX 1.6.3. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6047 This bug was a regression to LyX 1.5.x because of the new \ensuremath handling. The bug reporter said that it worked with LyX

Re: [patch] new layout file for the tufte-book document class

Can we set a Provide hyperref 1 in the layout file (and handle that correctly in source)? This doesn't help. You can still enable hyperref in the document style dialog. When you do this LyX wouldn't load hyperref in the preamble with \usepackage{hyperref} but the \hypersetup remains and

Re: [patch] new layout file for the tufte-book document class

I wrote schrieb: I now only cleaned up the tufte-handout.layout since it is exactly the same as the tufte-book.layout, with the only difference that article.layout is loaded. Jürgen, I hope it was OK to do this also directly in branch. It was not. I think I forgot to mark part and part* as

Re: LyX with Google Wave?

Missing multiple X displays is not the problem as having them would not lead to a cross-platform solution including native Windows (i.e. without X server) and Mac. I can imagine a possible solution along the lines of separate processes communicating over the network using something like the

Re: Bug with possible data loss: unwanted package use?

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 02:40:46PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Guenter Milde writes: > > >> I am surprised that this bug has not been identified earlier. > > > > If I am not mixing up something, it is http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/5530 > > > >LyX expansion

Re: Bug with possible data loss: unwanted package use?

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 02:43:16AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> It is not that easy. When I send my file to other who don't have LyX 1.6.4 > >> the file doesn't work while we promise that all files in a stable release > >> series. When we would have added this only to LyX 2.0 we would be able

Re: [patch] new layout file for the tufte-book document class

Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> This doesn't help. You can still enable hyperref in the document style >> dialog. When you do this LyX wouldn't load hyperref in the preamble with >> \usepackage{hyperref} but the \hypersetup remains and effects the options >> for

Re: r31789 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:24:03PM +0100, for...@lyx.org wrote: > Author: forenr > Date: Thu Oct 29 14:24:02 2009 > New Revision: 31789 > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31789 > > Log: > Better fix for bug #6270. The outer braces are swallowed only for user > defined macros, so better use

Re: [patch] new layout file for the tufte-book document class

Uwe Stöhr schrieb: I now only cleaned up the tufte-handout.layout since it is exactly the same as the tufte-book.layout, with the only difference that article.layout is loaded. Jürgen, I hope it was OK to do this also directly in branch. It was not. I think I forgot to mark part and part*

Server Painfully Slow

At least the web part. Can anyone try to do something about this? rh

Re: Bug with possible data loss: unwanted package use?

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:20:57PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I would be curious to see how big the overhaul would be. It turned out to be not so big. The attached patch fixes the problem for me. -- Enrico Index: src/mathed/InsetMathGrid.cpp

Undo gives warning

Every undo action now gives a warning that there is no open group. Vincent

Re: r31793 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

v...@lyx.org wrote: > Author: vfr > Date: Thu Oct 29 23:08:05 2009 > New Revision: 31793 > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31793 > > Log: > Text3.cpp: fix unintended fall-throughs. > > Modified: >lyx-devel/trunk/src/Text3.cpp > > Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Text3.cpp >

Re: r31793 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Pavel Sanda schreef: v...@lyx.org wrote: Author: vfr Date: Thu Oct 29 23:08:05 2009 New Revision: 31793 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31793 Log: Text3.cpp: fix unintended fall-throughs. Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Text3.cpp Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Text3.cpp

Re: Bug with possible data loss: unwanted package use?

>> Note that the addition of mhchem was adding a new feature not a bug >> fix. I use \ce and mhchem successfully also with LyX 1.6.3. > > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6047 This bug was a regression to LyX 1.5.x because of the new \ensuremath handling. The bug reporter said that it worked with

Re: [patch] new layout file for the tufte-book document class

>>> Can we set a "Provide hyperref 1" in the layout file (and handle that >>> correctly in source)? >>> >> This doesn't help. You can still enable hyperref in the document style >> dialog. When you do this LyX wouldn't load hyperref in the preamble with >> \usepackage{hyperref} but the

Re: [patch] new layout file for the tufte-book document class

I wrote schrieb: I now only cleaned up the tufte-handout.layout since it is exactly the same as the tufte-book.layout, with the only difference that article.layout is loaded. Jürgen, I hope it was OK to do this also directly in branch. It was not. I think I forgot to mark part and part* as