Re: Re: [PATCH] Tracking correctly available translations (take 2)

2012-08-23 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 um 23:42:50, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 23/08/12 17:22, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 um 15:38:29, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > > > > Which mo files are created? We would end with two lists (automake and cmake) > > The mo fi

Re: [PATCH] Tracking correctly available translations (take 2)

2012-08-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 23/08/12 17:22, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 um 15:38:29, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Which mo files are created? We would end with two lists (automake and cmake) The mo files are the compiled .po file that we always have been installing in po/. I prefer the

Re: [PATCH] Tracking correctly available translations (take 2)

2012-08-23 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 um 15:38:29, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > This patch is an alternative to commit ed1515ef69, which introduced the > installed_translations file. The new approach is to search for the .mo > files. Which mo files are created? We would end with two lists (automake

[PATCH] Tracking correctly available translations (take 2)

2012-08-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
This patch is an alternative to commit ed1515ef69, which introduced the installed_translations file. The new approach is to search for the .mo files. I did not want to do that at first because I feared that in some situations the files could be at some place where we do not expect them. But sin

Re: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

2012-08-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 23/08/2012 14:27, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I don't know how to dispatch a function to a buffer without first switching to it: vLv->setBuffer(b); lyx::dispatch(funcToRun); Is there a better way?

RE: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

2012-08-23 Thread Scott Kostyshak
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:41 AM >Le 23/08/2012 06:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> Currently buffer-forall rehides each hidden buffer after the LFUN is applied. >> Should it not do that? >Is it because they had to be made visible earlier? I

Re: Re: [LyX master] An IPA toolbar

2012-08-23 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 um 08:31:27, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > 2012/8/21 Kornel Benko : > > This is really a big set of translation strings. > > Yes, and probably not easy to translate for a non-linguist. I suggest > you look up for an IPA (or phonetics) website in your language to get >

Re: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

2012-08-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 23/08/2012 06:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Currently buffer-forall rehides each hidden buffer after the LFUN is applied. Should it not do that? Is it because they had to be made visible earlier? JMarc