Can we please revert the moderncv and achemso changes in branch unless we have
come to a final conclusion?
Jürgen
On 02-Jan-13 3:58 AM, Uwe Sthr wrote:
Am
18.12.2012 12:04, schrieb Zohar Levi:
As can be
seen in the image below I'm using the siggraph template, and the
only way I
found to set the teaser image inside a float
Am Dienstag, 1. Januar 2013 um 17:17:32, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
v...@lyx.org
Sure, and what do you propose instead?
You could use lyxtolyx to convert to latest format. Then export to tex,
convert to LyX and compare with the lyxtolyx'ed original file.
This was forbidden by
Am Sonntag, 30. Dezember 2012 um 15:25:26, schrieb José Matos jama...@lyx.org
On 12/30/2012 10:29 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
I am not a python expert. If it does not harm, we may omit
'close_fds=True'.
It still works on UNIX, so I will remove it.
Vincent
Kornel
On 01/01/2013 10:34 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 16.12.2012 19:33, schrieb Richard Heck:
1. backward compatibility
Perhaps I am reading too much into this, but if your main concern is
the example or template file,
then there is no issue here. I have already said that I have no
objection to
On 01/01/2013 11:31 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2013 10:20, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
- Jürgen, I noticed that your doc file linguistics.lyx needs the
package
etoolbox. Can I put it on the list of packages needed by doc files?
Sure.
Done. OK for branch too Richard?
On 01/01/2013 11:29 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2013 01:35, schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
OK to go in?
You just reintroduce bug 7718.
Hmm, you also said that I even reintroduced 3 bugs. But I am using a
German Windows and even with paths with spaces and umlauts I could not
reproduce the
The source code for LyX 2.0.5.1 has been posted to ftp.lyx.org:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/2.0.x/
Please let me have binaries as soon as you are able. I aim to announce
within a few days.
Richard
On 01/01/2013 11:17 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello Richard,
can you please put the new installer version 5 to ftp.lyx.org from here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
I know that LyX 2.0.5.1 is coming soon but the fixed bugs are major:
There were 2
OK, so I just want a very simple answer here, please. No theory. Just
commands. ;-)
Here's my local situation.
I have created a branch v2.0.5.1 on which I did the work preparing that
release.
I have tagged the head of that branch as 2.0.5.1.
Now I need to get that tag, and the associated
Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013 um 11:08:43, schrieb Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org
OK, so I just want a very simple answer here, please. No theory. Just
commands. ;-)
Here's my local situation.
I have created a branch v2.0.5.1 on which I did the work preparing that
release.
I have tagged
I'm looking forward to making some tests for LyX but right now I can't
run the tests.
I'm on Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit using current master branch. I installed
the following packages:
wmctrl
pcregrep
xvkbd
libxaw7-dev and libxtst-dev
Please see the attached files for the errors that I ran into.
A few
On 01/02/2013 12:42 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013 um 11:08:43, schrieb Richard Heck
rgh...@lyx.org
OK, so I just want a very simple answer here, please. No theory. Just
commands. ;-)
Here's my local situation.
I have created a branch v2.0.5.1 on which I did
git push --tags theremote thebranch
Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Dienstag, 1. Januar 2013 um 17:17:32, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
v...@lyx.org
Sure, and what do you propose instead?
You could use lyxtolyx to convert to latest format. Then export to tex,
convert to LyX and compare with the lyxtolyx'ed original file.
On 01/01/2013 8:48 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2013 10:28, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
It is a label used for the old caption layouts. It outputs the float
type plus
counter or Senseless!!! outside floats. See for instance
CaptionAbove in the
branch KOMA layouts.
But Senseless!!! is the
Am 02.01.2013 16:26, schrieb Richard Heck:
I have just posted the 2.0.5.1 source, which you can get from the FTP site. I
would suggest we skip
this one and just post that one, which we can do as soon as it is ready.
There is a bug in configure.ac: you have not set the current date
Am 02.01.2013 15:53, schrieb Richard Heck:
This needs to be tested before it can be released, and 2.0.5.1 is imminent.
It was already committed to branch as I tested it and you gave your OK.
If you absolutely need it for your installer, then you can patch the source
yourself before you
Am 02.01.2013 15:45, schrieb Richard Heck:
Done. OK for branch too Richard?
Yes, OK.
Is branch frozen? If so, when will it be open again?
Btw. can you please commit the changes you made to the po-files (remerge results)? I used the
versions in the 2.0.5.1 zip package but it would be good
Am 02.01.2013 09:57, schrieb Zohar Levi:
The image itself is not a problem, but I set the box mini page to be 207% column
width,
That is the reason why it is wider than the screen in LyX. So it#s no bug in
LyX but your fault.
i.e. to span two columns for the embedded image (my solution for
On 18/10/2012 5:17 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So the only problem that remains is these ugly toolbars on startup. I do
not understand why this happens only with these new ones.
JMarc
I find this annoying too. Seems like some automated preference file
should have these new toolbars OFF
Julien Rioux wrote:
On 18/10/2012 5:17 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So the only problem that remains is these ugly toolbars on startup. I do
not understand why this happens only with these new ones.
JMarc
I find this annoying too. Seems like some automated preference file should
have
Anyone else seeing this?
--
Julien
In 2.0 if I define the simple layout
InsetLayout Flex:LatexParamTest
LatexType environment
LatexName awesome
LatexParam [eh?]
LyXType custom
End
The latex output from such an inset looks like:
\begin{awesome}
[eh?]content
\end{awesome}
while I think it should be
\begin{awesome}[eh?]
In 2.1 if I define Arguments for my InsetLayout (great feature!) I note
that lyx2lyx backport from 2.1 to 2.0 converts
\begin_layout Argument 1
to
\begin_layout Argument
which isn't understood by 2.0 (maybe this conversion works for Style,
which has some OptArgument and ReqArgument support
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 02.01.2013 16:26, schrieb Richard Heck:
I have just posted the 2.0.5.1 source, which you can get from the FTP
site. I would suggest we skip
this one and just post that one, which we can do as soon as it is ready.
There is a bug in configure.ac: you have not set the
Am 02.01.2013 16:25, schrieb Richard Heck:
The source code for LyX 2.0.5.1 has been posted to ftp.lyx.org:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/2.0.x/
Please let me have binaries as soon as you are able. I aim to announce within a
few days.
You find the installer for 2.0.5.1 here:
Can we please revert the moderncv and achemso changes in branch unless we have
come to a final conclusion?
Jürgen
On 02-Jan-13 3:58 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am
18.12.2012 12:04, schrieb Zohar Levi:
As can be
seen in the image below I'm using the siggraph template, and the
only way I
found to set the teaser image inside a float
Am Dienstag, 1. Januar 2013 um 17:17:32, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> >
> > Sure, and what do you propose instead?
> >
>
> You could use lyxtolyx to convert to latest format. Then export to tex,
> convert to LyX and compare with the lyxtolyx'ed original file.
This was
Am Sonntag, 30. Dezember 2012 um 15:25:26, schrieb José Matos
> On 12/30/2012 10:29 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > I am not a python expert. If it does not harm, we may omit
> > 'close_fds=True'.
> >
> > It still works on UNIX, so I will remove it.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Vincent
>
On 01/01/2013 10:34 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 16.12.2012 19:33, schrieb Richard Heck:
1. backward compatibility
Perhaps I am reading too much into this, but if your main concern is
the example or template file,
then there is no issue here. I have already said that I have no
objection to
On 01/01/2013 11:31 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2013 10:20, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
- Jürgen, I noticed that your doc file linguistics.lyx needs the
package
etoolbox. Can I put it on the list of packages needed by doc files?
Sure.
Done. OK for branch too Richard?
On 01/01/2013 11:29 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2013 01:35, schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
OK to go in?
You just reintroduce bug 7718.
Hmm, you also said that I even reintroduced 3 bugs. But I am using a
German Windows and even with paths with spaces and umlauts I could not
reproduce the
The source code for LyX 2.0.5.1 has been posted to ftp.lyx.org:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/2.0.x/
Please let me have binaries as soon as you are able. I aim to announce
within a few days.
Richard
On 01/01/2013 11:17 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello Richard,
can you please put the new installer version 5 to ftp.lyx.org from here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
I know that LyX 2.0.5.1 is coming soon but the fixed bugs are major:
There were 2
OK, so I just want a very simple answer here, please. No theory. Just
commands. ;-)
Here's my local situation.
I have created a branch v2.0.5.1 on which I did the work preparing that
release.
I have tagged the head of that branch as 2.0.5.1.
Now I need to get that tag, and the associated
Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013 um 11:08:43, schrieb Richard Heck
>
> OK, so I just want a very simple answer here, please. No theory. Just
> commands. ;-)
>
> Here's my local situation.
>
> I have created a branch v2.0.5.1 on which I did the work preparing that
> release.
>
> I
I'm looking forward to making some tests for LyX but right now I can't
run the tests.
I'm on Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit using current master branch. I installed
the following packages:
wmctrl
pcregrep
xvkbd
libxaw7-dev and libxtst-dev
Please see the attached files for the errors that I ran into.
A few
On 01/02/2013 12:42 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013 um 11:08:43, schrieb Richard Heck
>
> OK, so I just want a very simple answer here, please. No theory. Just
> commands. ;-)
>
> Here's my local situation.
>
> I have created a branch v2.0.5.1 on
git push --tags theremote thebranch
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 1. Januar 2013 um 17:17:32, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
>
>> >
>> > Sure, and what do you propose instead?
>> >
>>
>> You could use lyxtolyx to convert to latest format. Then export to tex,
>> convert to LyX and compare with the lyxtolyx'ed
On 01/01/2013 8:48 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2013 10:28, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
It is a label used for the old caption layouts. It outputs the float
type plus
counter or "Senseless!!!" outside floats. See for instance
CaptionAbove in the
branch KOMA layouts.
But "Senseless!!!" is
Am 02.01.2013 16:26, schrieb Richard Heck:
I have just posted the 2.0.5.1 source, which you can get from the FTP site. I
would suggest we skip
this one and just post that one, which we can do as soon as it is ready.
There is a bug in configure.ac: you have not set the current date
Am 02.01.2013 15:53, schrieb Richard Heck:
This needs to be tested before it can be released, and 2.0.5.1 is imminent.
It was already committed to branch as I tested it and you gave your OK.
If you absolutely need it for your installer, then you can patch the source
yourself before you
Am 02.01.2013 15:45, schrieb Richard Heck:
Done. OK for branch too Richard?
Yes, OK.
Is branch frozen? If so, when will it be open again?
Btw. can you please commit the changes you made to the po-files (remerge results)? I used the
versions in the 2.0.5.1 zip package but it would be good
Am 02.01.2013 09:57, schrieb Zohar Levi:
The image itself is not a problem, but I set the box mini page to be 207% column
width,
That is the reason why it is wider than the screen in LyX. So it#s no bug in
LyX but your fault.
i.e. to span two columns for the embedded image (my solution for
On 18/10/2012 5:17 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So the only problem that remains is these ugly toolbars on startup. I do
not understand why this happens only with these new ones.
JMarc
I find this annoying too. Seems like some automated preference file
should have these new toolbars OFF
Julien Rioux wrote:
> On 18/10/2012 5:17 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> So the only problem that remains is these ugly toolbars on startup. I do
>> not understand why this happens only with these new ones.
>>
>> JMarc
>>
>
> I find this annoying too. Seems like some automated preference file
Anyone else seeing this?
--
Julien
In 2.0 if I define the simple layout
InsetLayout "Flex:LatexParamTest"
LatexType environment
LatexName awesome
LatexParam "[eh?]"
LyXType custom
End
The latex output from such an inset looks like:
\begin{awesome}
[eh?]content
\end{awesome}
while I think it should be
In 2.1 if I define Arguments for my InsetLayout (great feature!) I note
that lyx2lyx backport from 2.1 to 2.0 converts
\begin_layout Argument 1
to
\begin_layout Argument
which isn't understood by 2.0 (maybe this conversion works for Style,
which has some OptArgument and ReqArgument support
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 02.01.2013 16:26, schrieb Richard Heck:
>
>> I have just posted the 2.0.5.1 source, which you can get from the FTP
>> site. I would suggest we skip
>> this one and just post that one, which we can do as soon as it is ready.
>
> There is a bug in configure.ac: you have not
Am 02.01.2013 16:25, schrieb Richard Heck:
The source code for LyX 2.0.5.1 has been posted to ftp.lyx.org:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/2.0.x/
Please let me have binaries as soon as you are able. I aim to announce within a
few days.
You find the installer for 2.0.5.1 here:
54 matches
Mail list logo