On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:27:51PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> Looks fine to me.
It's in at 892593f.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 01:51:05PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Try this patch. Setting env var LYX_DEBUG_LATEX to '1' will produce logs with
> latex.
> No change of logs if set to '0' or not set at all.
Looks good. If that covers Günter's request I think it makes sense to go
in, at least until
Am 11.10.2016 um 02:41 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.2/
But please give me 2 days to test it before announcing.
I discovered some translation issues (independent of LyX). I just
uploaded a new installer with the same version number where these are fixed.
I don't know how
Am 11.10.2016 um 15:05 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
French UserGuide.lyx: back to format of 2.2
Sorry for this, but see the last "rule" of the documentation
guidelines: don't upgrade the fileformat unnecessarily
OK, but how do I know that it should not be upgraded?
See the file
Am 11.10.2016 um 08:55 schrieb racoon:
Thanks! I have installed it. And everything seems to work as expected
for now.
Many thanks.
I am not sure how to test the installer thoroughly.
This is personal test routine:
1. does the installation over an existing LyX 2.2.x work?
2. does a new
Am 11.10.2016 um 13:02 schrieb Kornel Benko:
Cmake still searches first for version 2.7, see line CMakeLists.txt:683 in
branch 2.2.x.
The version is written into CMakeCache.txt in the build-dir.
Using the same CMakeCache.txt on different environments may have the effect you
describe.
Many
Am Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2016 um 18:49:21, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> Le 09/10/2016 à 16:27, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
> > Le 09/10/2016 à 02:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>
> >>
> >> Now all -R "character" tests pass for me.
> >>
> >
> > Not for me (with
Le 09/10/2016 à 16:27, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
Le 09/10/2016 à 02:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Now all -R "character" tests pass for me.
Not for me (with an up to date master executable):
The following tests FAILED:
257 -
On 10/10/2016 12:32 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:30:25PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
>> I plan to soon propose to change the default of the working directory to
>> '.', as this thread originally started out as. I would like to test a
>> bit and take a look at where
Le 10/10/2016 à 22:47, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
commit ef4594c71e1dc0e3006b459bc53ea964ce1cdf82
Author: Uwe Stöhr
Date: Mon Oct 10 23:47:33 2016 +0200
French UserGuide.lyx: back to format of 2.2
Sorry for this, but see the last "rule" of the documentation guidelines:
Le 10/10/2016 à 16:49, Richard Heck a écrit :
Here:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/2.2.2/
Please prepare binaries.
Compiles and runs flawlessly on Debian Jessie, g++ 4.9.2, Qt 4.8.6, TeXLive 2016
--
Jean-Pierre
Am Montag, 10. Oktober 2016 um 19:44:09, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Montag, 10. Oktober 2016 um 09:56:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:56:39AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >
> > > > Difficult.
> > >
> > > Then the debug output for
Am Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2016 um 02:39:39, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 11.10.2016 um 00:23 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
>
> > I cannot compile the tarball due to this CMake error:
>
> After doing exactly the same again and setting up everything from
> scratch, I can now compile. Argh, I
On 11/10/2016 1:45 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 11.10.2016 um 00:50 schrieb racoon:
Which Qt version will be used for LyX 2.2.2? Qt 5.6.2 is around the
corner (possibly next week).
Qt 6.5.2 is delayed now for 3 weeks so I built using the available
version 5.6.1. If 5.6.2 comes out, I will
On 11.10.2016 02:45, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 11.10.2016 um 00:50 schrieb racoon:
Which Qt version will be used for LyX 2.2.2? Qt 5.6.2 is around the
corner (possibly next week).
Qt 6.5.2 is delayed now for 3 weeks so I built using the available
version 5.6.1. If 5.6.2 comes out, I will provide a
15 matches
Mail list logo