Re: [patch] support for \baselineskip

2017-04-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 04.04.2017 a las 05:02, Pavel Sanda escribió: Uwe Stöhr wrote: revert = [ - [534, [revert_dashligatures]], + [535, [revert_baselineskip]], + [534, [revert_dashligatures, revert_baselineskip]], why is revert_baselineskip 2x? This was a mistake. I forgot to

Re: [patch] support for formula indentation

2017-04-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 04.04.2017 a las 06:52, Pavel Sanda escribió: + formula_indent = false; + formula_indentation = string(); Could you use something less cryptic, so the name of variables is not ambiguous. For example formula_indetation_used or anything which makes the distinction between the two

Re: [patch] Re: LyX master still not ready for Python 3

2017-04-04 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 21.43.58 WEST Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Hi José, > > many thanks for having a look. > > Why CMake 2.6? That was released 9 years (sic!) ago. Using it is a > potential security issue. i am wondering if people still use this. > > In my opinion we should rely on CMake 2.8, release

Re: [patch] support for \xout

2017-04-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 03.04.2017 a las 02:39, Uwe Stöhr escribió: I think it would be fine just to output this as . OK, I'll do so when I can commit. The patch is in. regards Uwe

Re: need help with support for the Noto fonts

2017-04-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 04.04.2017 a las 07:12, Jürgen Spitzmüller escribió: Jürgen, do you see any chance to implement this? Not now. OK, So I put it in without support for the scaling. This can be done later. I opened bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10611 for this. many thanks and regards Uwe

Re: [patch] Re: LyX master still not ready for Python 3

2017-04-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 04.04.2017 a las 21:01, José Abílio Matos escribió: Regarding the support for older versions of python 2 we already test both using the autotools ( >= 2.7.0 ) and cmake (>= 2.6). Hi José, many thanks for having a look. Why CMake 2.6? That was released 9 years (sic!) ago. Using it is a po

Re: Doxygen generated documentation now (hopefully) auto-deploying to https://www.lyx.org/sourcedoc/

2017-04-04 Thread Christian Ridderström
On 28 February 2017 at 03:24, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Christian Ridderström wrote: > > Currently we're also keeping all the previously generated "sourcedocs". > > There I'm guessing we at most would like to keep a few, or perhaps none. > > I don't see the need for the older ones. I'm changing the

Doxygen sourcedoc: Should there be a non-empty "main" page?

2017-04-04 Thread Christian Ridderström
Hi, Should the Doxygen docs have a "main page"? At https://www.lyx.org/sourcedoc/latest/index.html the main page is currently empty. I don't know if this is an error on my side, or if we simply haven't created a main page. /Christian

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #118

2017-04-04 Thread Christian Ridderström
On 28 March 2017 at 11:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 25/03/2017 à 14:07, ci-...@inria.fr a écrit : > >> https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xen >> ial-qt4-autotools-extended/118/ >> >> > Christian, did you do something to have it back to normal ? > Yes, I think so. I

Re: [patch] Re: LyX master still not ready for Python 3

2017-04-04 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Sunday, 2 April 2017 13.40.05 WEST Uwe Stöhr wrote: > - the file was opened without the correct encoding. Since nothing was > give, utf8 was used. That failed because on Windows it is in cp1252. In > my patch I use io.open which works with Python 2.6 and 2.7. I think we > don't need to support a

Re: cmake build

2017-04-04 Thread Ian Wilder
On 2017-03-13 09:28:22 +, Kornel Benko said: Am Sonntag, 12. März 2017 um 16:35:43, schrieb Ian Wilder On 2017-02-13 16:21:52 +, Kornel Benko said: Am Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2017 um 09:58:40, schrieb Ian Wilder Hey everyone! ... 1.) Please do not use source dir as build dir. Th