just made that OS upgrade, and can't compile LyX anymore
the usual autogen.sh; configure [params] doesn't output a Makefile, so make
won't run anything
Anyone with a clue ? is there a different recipe to restart compilation from
scratch ? (did also a make distclean, didn't help)
Thanks,
Hi,
I created a copr for the development versions (lyx-2.3 for now):
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jamatos/lyx-devel/
This is more or less the equivalent of ppa for the debian/ubuntu world.
These packages have the suffix -devel, the fedora package is called lyx-
Am 12.10.2016 um 04:30 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:27:51PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> Looks fine to me.
>
> It's in at 892593f.
Hi Scott, I’m sorry to say that I missed the consequence of this change.
On Mac the initial value for CWD of a program started from D
Dear list,
Here are a few patches recommended for inclusion related to the support
of the new ACM class provided by John Perry
(http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10632).
1. InPreamble styles can be freely fixed with InTitle styles.
2. The layout by John Perry and a few changes by me, fully tested.
Is that a threat ? Am I supposed to be scared ?
JMarc
Le 5 mai 2017 23:35:16 GMT+02:00, Guillaume MM a écrit :
>Le 05/05/2017 à 19:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>> I can tell you that I am very grateful to Guillaume for his
>persistence.
>
>Thanks to you for listening. It is not finished...
Le 6 mai 2017 02:03:20 GMT+02:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:35:16PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote:
>> Le 05/05/2017 à 19:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>> > > No, I am not going to "feel free" to implement it. I already
>"fell free"
>>
>> "felt" ;)
>
>You beat me to
Am Freitag, 5. Mai 2017 um 20:03:44, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:17:23PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 5. Mai 2017 um 05:49:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > > One of our mirrors is:
> > >
> > > http://ftp.icm.edu.pl/packages/lyx
> > >
> > > Is it norm
On 06/05/2017 02:02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Yes please revert. I remember there being some disagreement about the
file formats patch. I could be wrong though. Please see my questions
here:
reverted, those 2 patches remain available in my
tommaso features/2.3.0alpha
branch, thanks.