Le 11/08/2017 à 16:37, jpc a écrit :
commit 65bee010a00a8aee75b6f1fabf911a805a69965c
Author: jpc
Date: Fri Aug 11 16:36:22 2017 +0200
Update French translation of Linguistics manual
---
lib/examples/fr/linguistics.lyx | 108 +++---
1 files changed
On 08/11/2017 07:03 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>> I agree HTML pages online would be nice.
>> Not sure if our manuals can (in a nice way) just be exported as HTML though.
> Last time I tried (around 2009 and "merged manuals" idea) it did not came out
> nicely.
> IIRC I
On 08/11/2017 04:32 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:26:23PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
>> d) convert "ligature dashes" to ERT
>>
>>-1 Enrico2017-06-01, "I am fiercely opposed to … ERT …"
>>-1 Jean-Marc 16 Jul 2017 "nobody wants to really use it"
>>+1 Richa
On 2017-08-11, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On 11 August 2017 at 13:03, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>> > [*] It might make sense to have a CI job that builds PDFs etc from the
>> > manuals as a separate test.
This is already done by Kornel's export test suite. All manual
Le 11/08/2017 à 15:55, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
In theory the procedure above could work on PDFs (or perhaps PS?), or possible
PDFs converted to RTF or something else that's text based duh, perhaps HTML
:-)
What about using the command 'strings' (maybe with an appropriate option)?
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> from my viewpoint, it would be good to have the manuals just available and
> searchable on-line, i.e., when I'm looking for something on a search
That was exactly the idea behind merged manuals. Fortunately some italian
guy implemented advanced search through all manua
Indeed.
JMarc
Le 11 août 2017 13:11:27 GMT+02:00, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>Guenter Milde wrote:
>> f) keep the current 2.3alpha behaviour (buffer setting)
>>
>>+1 Pavel 28 Jul 2017 "I tend to agree with f)"
>>+1 Enrico28 Jul 2017 "IMO, f) is the best compromise"
>>-1 Günter
On 11/08/2017 15:55, Christian Ridderström wrote:
simply to ensure that LyX doesn't fail when reading and exporting the manuals
as PDFs.
from my viewpoint, it would be good to have the manuals just available and
searchable on-line, i.e., when I'm looking for something on a search engine,
bei
On 11 August 2017 at 13:03, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > I agree HTML pages online would be nice.
> > Not sure if our manuals can (in a nice way) just be exported as HTML
> though.
>
> Last time I tried (around 2009 and "merged manuals" idea) it did not came
> out nicely.
On 11/08/2017 11:44, Christian Ridderström wrote:
Do we have a description somewhere, perhaps in the source, as to what and how
the different converters are triggered?
How are files found for which converters are to be triggered?
How is the type of the file determined?
Format.cpp: Formats::ge
Guenter Milde wrote:
> f) keep the current 2.3alpha behaviour (buffer setting)
>
>+1 Pavel 28 Jul 2017 "I tend to agree with f)"
>+1 Enrico28 Jul 2017 "IMO, f) is the best compromise"
>-1 Günter04/25/17"possible data loss and formatting changes"
I believe JMarc is miss
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I agree HTML pages online would be nice.
> Not sure if our manuals can (in a nice way) just be exported as HTML though.
Last time I tried (around 2009 and "merged manuals" idea) it did not came out
nicely.
IIRC I reported the issues, Richard might have fixed them s
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Guess this is the standard. So, would we need the attached patch ?
Please check with windows people as well. This is very touchy thing in our
conversion chain & widely used -- it would be major regression if we suddenly
do not produce pdf file for documents with postscri
Guenter Milde wrote:
> My answer was about the first part of the question: whether Postscript
> code can be *embedded* in the LyX document.
I have no clue what are you asking about then... P
Guillaume MM wrote:
> Le 04/08/2017 ?? 18:51, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
>> As per the HTML, if this is the standard for LyX then let's go for it.
>>
> I don't think it is standard, but needauth messages are unusually long and
> require attention, and this is for them that that LyX dialogs were a
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Pavel, should this be counted as a vote in favor of f?
Correct. Pavel
I vote to keep the current 2.3 behavior.
JMarc
Le 11 août 2017 10:32:57 GMT+02:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:46:52AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> I think the 2.3 behavior, as I understand it (aka ``pick your
>poison'') at
>> least has the benefit of being p
On 11 August 2017 at 08:35, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On 8 August 2017 at 18:28, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>
>> I just noticed these broken links
>>
>> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Manuals#download
>> http://ftp.lyx.de/Documentation/en/Customization.lyx
>> http://ftp.lyx.de/Documentation/en
Hi,
Do we have a description somewhere, perhaps in the source, as to what and
how the different converters are triggered?
How are files found for which converters are to be triggered?
1) File referenced by graphics insets
2) All files in certain locations
3) ?
How is the type of the file determi
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 08:46:03AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> I'm on vacation.
> But I'm able to download and compile a tar for beta and give feedback with
> some delay.
Thanks for making the time, Stephan.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 01:12:11AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> El 09.08.2017 a las 09:56, Scott Kostyshak escribió:
>
> > Uwe, can I send you a tar tomorrow for a practice build? This has
> > uncovered issues in the past.
>
> No, I have a lot of stress these days at work. I cannot do enough before
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 08:35:04AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Scott, are the manuals and their updating perhaps related to your notes on
> release procedure?
I don't currently have any notes on this, but it's possible this was
written somewhere and I missed it. Please let me know the e
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:56:23PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Sounds pretty good to me.
>
> Searching manually for the ID as per above caused me some problems
> initially.
> I can't just paste the message ID from your link as the %2B has replaced
> '+' in the ID.
But at least I think
Le 11/08/2017 à 08:35, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
IIRC, Uwe is related to this. CC:ing him. (to his @lyx.org-account, which could
be wrong)
No it's right, but he prefers to get mails on his personal address
uwesto...@web.de
--
Jean-Pierre
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:45:28PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I tend to agree with f).
Pavel, should this be counted as a vote in favor of f? I would like to
double-check since you seem a little hesitant.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:46:52AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think the 2.3 behavior, as I understand it (aka ``pick your poison'') at
> least has the benefit of being predictable.
JMarc, which option do you vote for?
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:26:23PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> d) convert "ligature dashes" to ERT
>
>-1 Enrico2017-06-01, "I am fiercely opposed to … ERT …"
>-1 Jean-Marc 16 Jul 2017 "nobody wants to really use it"
>+1 Richard 04/26/2017 "This seems the simplest."
>+1 Gü
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:26:23PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2017-08-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Right now, it seems there is more support for f, which I understand to
> > mean "do nothing" with respect to the current behavior in master. If
> > anyone else would like to vote,
28 matches
Mail list logo