On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:34:34PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> El 10.09.2017 a las 01:38, Uwe Stöhr escribió:
>
> > Just the patch for
> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10679
> > should go in before.
>
> Jürgen found now a fix.
Nice.
> Meanwhile I testes LyX 2.3 a lot the last 2 days. It is stab
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 06:55:57AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Dear Scot, dear Docutils developers,
>
> On 2017-09-04, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
>
> >> The problem is, however, that users upgrading from 2.2 have read the
> >> 2.2.0 RELEASE NOTES already and won't see the need to re-read them,
>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:50:19PM +0900, K. Yokota wrote:
> I confirmed it worked fine with most recent 2.3.x. This removes extra
> sequence before starting to write a document!
>
> Thank you everyone!!
Thanks for testing, Koji! And thanks to Jürgen for the fix.
Scott
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:14:26PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2017-08-31, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> Dear LyX developers,
>
> is there a chance to fix the following problems instead of just
> documenting them?
Fine with me as long as you get a +1.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 2:02 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> On 09/11/2017 01:35 PM, Ian Wilder wrote:
>> I am also having this problem. Ever since I tried to build the 2.3 branch
>> from git using cmake, I have been unable to use the 2.3 binaries. I am not
>> sure if they are related, but I figured
El 10.09.2017 a las 01:38, Uwe Stöhr escribió:
Just the patch for
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10679
should go in before.
Jürgen found now a fix.
Meanwhile I testes LyX 2.3 a lot the last 2 days. It is stable for my needs.
Concerning libiconv 1.15, there are not yet opinions.
Concerning l
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > If it's not easily possible we should at least make clear to newcomers that
> > lyx without tex & imagemagick will have lot of problems.
>
> LyX without TeX is a problem. This can be solved by a newcomer by installing
> MacTeX. Easy.
> LyX without ImageMagick shouldn???t
On 09/11/2017 01:35 PM, Ian Wilder wrote:
>
> I am also having this problem. Ever since I tried to build the 2.3
> branch from git using cmake, I have been unable to use the 2.3
> binaries. I am not sure if they are related, but I figured mentioning
> might help.
>
>
> To be clear, when I try and r
I am also having this problem. Ever since I tried to build the 2.3
branch from git using cmake, I have been unable to use the 2.3
binaries. I am not sure if they are related, but I figured mentioning
might help.
To be clear, when I try and run 2.3.0-beta1 from the dmg I get the message
"The
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> Do you want me to rebase on a regular basis? Or you can ping me whenever
> >>> you want a rebase.
> >> I just need that fileformat number is equal to lyx 2.3, otherwise do as
> >> you prefer...
> >
> > Hi Pavel, did you have time to look at th
Le 11/09/2017 à 16:50, mn a écrit :
On 11.09.17 16:18, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 11.09.2017 um 14:12 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
Stephan Witt wrote:
What can I do to convert the LyX documents containing inset-info
instances without ImageMagick?
ATM, LyX seems to have a hard dependency on the ImageMag
On 11.09.17 16:18, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 11.09.2017 um 14:12 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> What can I do to convert the LyX documents containing inset-info
>>> instances without ImageMagick?
>>>
>>> ATM, LyX seems to have a hard dependency on the ImageMagick
>>> tools. On
Am 11.09.2017 um 14:12 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> What can I do to convert the LyX documents containing inset-info instances
>> without ImageMagick?
>>
>> ATM, LyX seems to have a hard dependency on the ImageMagick tools. On a Mac
>> this implies the installation of MacPor
Stephan Witt wrote:
> What can I do to convert the LyX documents containing inset-info instances
> without ImageMagick?
>
> ATM, LyX seems to have a hard dependency on the ImageMagick tools. On a Mac
> this implies the installation of MacPorts of HomeBrew to get it. To do so one
> has to install
I confirmed it worked fine with most recent 2.3.x. This removes extra
sequence before starting to write a document!
Thank you everyone!!
2017-09-09 15:58 GMT+09:00 LyX Ticket Tracker :
> #10747: Add default output format for Japanese documents (pLaTeX)
> -+---
15 matches
Mail list logo