Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-11 21:50, Daniel wrote: On 2020-08-11 20:28, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Tuesday, 11 August 2020 18.21.12 WEST Daniel wrote: Thanks. So, I guess the ten font-sizes in LyX are pretty LaTeX-centric to begin with. One problem of the latex font size names IMHO is that it mixes logical

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-11 20:28, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Tuesday, 11 August 2020 18.21.12 WEST Daniel wrote: Thanks. So, I guess the ten font-sizes in LyX are pretty LaTeX-centric to begin with. One problem of the latex font size names IMHO is that it mixes logical with physical markups (form vs

Re: Font size names

On Tuesday, 11 August 2020 18.21.12 WEST Daniel wrote: > Thanks. So, I guess the ten font-sizes in LyX are pretty LaTeX-centric > to begin with. One problem of the latex font size names IMHO is that it mixes logical with physical markups (form vs content). That is particularly visible in the

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-11 17:40, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 15:41, Daniel > wrote: On 2020-08-11 07:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 21:44 +0200 schrieb Daniel: >> Since I always considered LyX to be quite LaTeX-centric, I

Re: Part no greater font size than Chapter/Section

On 8/11/20 1:13 AM, Daniel wrote: > On 2020-08-11 00:34, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> On 8/10/20 1:31 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>> Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 15:36 +0200 schrieb Daniel: > The font sizes should be those used in the cls file. The right > patch will be the one that

Re: Font size names

On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 15:41, Daniel wrote: > On 2020-08-11 07:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 21:44 +0200 schrieb Daniel: > >> Since I always considered LyX to be quite LaTeX-centric, I am > >> curious > >> > >> what application of LyX there is where one font size

tex2lyx tests failing on master

I get the following output: The following tests FAILED: 6 - tex2lyx/roundtrip/test.ltx (Failed) 8 - tex2lyx/roundtrip/algo2e.tex (Failed) 10 - tex2lyx/roundtrip/beamer.tex (Failed) 12 - tex2lyx/roundtrip/box-color-size-space-align.tex (Failed) 14 -

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-11 07:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 21:44 +0200 schrieb Daniel: Since I always considered LyX to be quite LaTeX-centric, I am curious what application of LyX there is where one font size step down from normal wouldn't be footnote size and still it makes

Re: Regression on master: zh_CN tutorial.lyx compiles with error

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 08:24:28AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 22:49 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > I get the following: > > > > Runaway argument? > > {\emph {包含了调整文档格式的详细方法，包括水平填�\ETC. > > ! File ended while scanning use of \textit . > > > >

Re: Font size names

Am Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:11:57 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Daniel: > > They are not just internal. For example, "giant" appears in the > > > > customization manual ("footnotesize" and "scriptsize" don't but > > neither do "smaller" and

Re: [PATCH] Character classification of InsetSpecialChar

Am 10.08.2020 um 13:53 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 9 août 2020 14:53:23 GMT+02:00, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> Next patch including the first one corrects the char count w/o >> additional >> inset member function. My primary target is to get the navigation >> correct. >> But improved

Re: Regression on master: zh_CN tutorial.lyx compiles with error

Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 22:49 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > I get the following: > > Runaway argument? > {\emph {包含了调整文档格式的详细方法，包括水平填�\ETC. > ! File ended while scanning use of \textit . > > \par > <*> Tutorial.tex I fixed the manual which used odd emphases.

Re: Font size names

Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Daniel: > They are not just internal. For example, "giant" appears in the > > customization manual ("footnotesize" and "scriptsize" don't but > neither do "smaller" and "smallest", I think it's just an unintended > ommission). Customization is not