On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 03:32:49PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> You mentioned scientific community before mentioning Word.
> I do not know which scientific community you belong to,
> but I know for sure that all computer scientists, mathematicians, and
> physicists I know use LaTeX. It's _THE
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 08:00:08PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> John, you really have a penchant to step on my toes for no particular
> reason. :-)
> Hopelessly naive implies that I'm an idiot who doesn't know what's he
> talking about.
I didn't mean to offend. Sorry.
> I grant you that some
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 05:46:15PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John, could you add it and/or grant me sufficient rights so that I can
> do it?
Have a go, I turned on all bits for you so you should be able to do it
now in theory
john
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 04:57:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Works for me for the "tabular create" dialog in both lyx 13x and
> >> 14x.
> >
> > Well, not here. This is fvwm2 but I doubt this is the reason.
Sounds to me like Andre is talking about the Tabular edit dialog not
Create, which
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:00:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Granted. But that doesn't have an "Ok" button, just a "Close".
True.
> Incidentally, How is life with you? Did you find your "Challenging
> position in systems software development"?
Sure did. I'm busy hacking Solaris for Sun.
>
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:09:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Interesting. Based here or in the US?
Both really :) I'm still in Manchester but practically everybody I work
with lives in California.
> Fair enough. It's been a frustrating time, but things *are* getting
> better.
That's good t
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:16:48PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> That'd be indeed a shame. But as all the change tracking code sits
> around in a corner somewhere it 'only' takes someone who knows how it
> used to work to cobble it together...
Last I looked, fixing it would require some non-trivi
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 12:04:26AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Question 1
> ==
> Is this safe? Ie, will it work if $FIG is empty?
> +if test "$FIG" = "xfig"; then
>
> The usual strategy is:
> +if test "x$FIG" = "xxfig"; then
>
> which is guaranteed to work with all versions of sh.
I n
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 12:52:53PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> * In 1.4, the top/bottom margin in the lyxview is close to zero. Personally, I
> don't like this.
It also means you don't see the cursor on the first line due to our
cursor displaying logic.
We need the margins back
john
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:25:10PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Now, personally, I think that it should be there, but leaving that to
> one side, why don't we have a minibuffer that 'appears' when I type
> 'M-x' and 'disappears' when I subsequently hit return? That way, its
> behaviour is anal
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:59:25AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>
> > It also means you don't see the cursor on the first line due to our
> > cursor displaying logic.
>
> I don't see this problem.
Try making the first line Title or
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:58:57PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Is this a permanent change?
Yes. I would like some things on top though (and have done for a long
time). First, the M-x thing Angus mentioned. Second a View->Toolbars
submenu.
regards
john
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:58:21PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I do, at least in the numerator of a fraction on the first line...
That's a different problem i.e. it was working before somebody messed up
all the new cursor painting stuff...
regards
john
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 11:34:43PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Well, if this would be done, I could live with it. Until then I'd
> prefer a visible mini-buffer. Makes debugging a bit easier.
We could probably enable it by default for development versions or
something
regards
john
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:32:32PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I think so. Here's why.
>
> The command buffer performs two roles:
> 1. It provides us with state information. (All those useful 'Running
> latex' etc messages.)
> 2. It gives us a means to enter lfuns from 'by hand'.
>
> The xform
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 05:02:59PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Resizing the Qt frontend dialog has no effect on the tabs :-( I'm sure
> it is something trivial, but I'm blowed if I know what.
You broke the layout (added something ?). You need to group stuff again
(select the objects then use th
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 06:09:27PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> So, if I understand correctly, the argument goes as follows.
>
> - nobody but a few knew of the command line
> - so we separated it from the status display to make them more visible
> - now it takes too much space
> - so we hide
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 06:16:21PM +0200, Rune Hansen wrote:
> I have found a bug in the lyx spellchecker that makes lyx crach
>
> To reproduce the crash:
>
> 1. Open several documents in lyx (with some spelling errors in it...)
>
> 2. Start spellchecker in one of the documents - when dialogb
Is it really intended that we expose the entire workarea every time I
move the cursor? Anybody tried this across a network yet?
regards
john
How do I get access to change the bugzilla frontpage? Where is it?
regards
john
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 07:39:57PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Excellent question... This prompted me to try to find it. It turns out
I couldn't work out how the virtual host ends up there though. There
doesn't seem to be anything in httpd.conf that says.
> This sucks. The frontpage nee
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 07:19:18PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> It's no problem on a 10 Mbit LAN. I havent' tried anything slower,
> though.
OK, we can live with that I suppose.
regards
john
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 08:22:52PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Modified files:
> lyx-devel/src/: BufferView_pimpl.C
>
> Log message:
> fix goto ref
>
> Patches:
> http://www.lyx.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lyx-devel/src/BufferView_pimpl.C?r1=1.539&r2=1.540
Um, didn't you test it?
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 09:30:10PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I found out by looking at /etc/httpd/virtual.d/
Weird, I must be going crazy, I looked but didn't see the virtual.d
directory
john
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 09:57:58PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> lyx-devel/src/mathed/: ref_inset.C command_inset.C
> command_inset.h
We abandoned changelogs?
john
This simple patch partially restores the improvements to the cursor
display logic I made some time ago. Now you don't lose the cursor
entirely whilst holding down right arrow.
However, the risk of regressions is high. I would like, however, to
apply the patch and ask everyone to keep a look out f
OK?
It should be relatively easy after this to add View->Toolbars, but
semantics are not immediately obvious (auto-toolbars).
regards
john
Index: lib/ui/default.ui
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/ui/default.ui,v
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 06:50:20PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I don't see it dissappearing on Return. Am I missing something?
I'm not sure whether we should do this or not to be honest. It's of
dubious utility and we'd have to somehow store whether it's temporary or
not.
> Incidentally, it's
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 02:21:15PM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
> I drink imports. :)
I should hope so too! Well that or the micros... I'm likely to be in
Ohio some time around never, but I'll take you up on that. Ohio's really
small, right ? ;)
john
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 08:51:33PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >I'd do that in a follow-up patch along with View->Toolbars (I don't
>
> Do we really need to have this in a menu? I never understood why
> programs tend to do this. What's wrong with the preferences dialog?
Because toolbar
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 08:09:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | How can we change the bugzilla frontpage?
>
> /home/bugzilla/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/custom/index.html.tmpl
>
> I added you and John to the bugzilla group.
Thanks. JMarc, I'm going to look at the page this ev
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:31:41PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> because QLToolBar (and its counterparts in the other frontends) does
> too much.
are you sure QLayout isn't already a Qt class?
> I think that the result is far cleaner. As a bonus, it gets rid of the
> ToolbarProxy class.
I don't
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 08:09:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> /home/bugzilla/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/custom/index.html.tmpl
>
> I added you and John to the bugzilla group.
Unfortunately most of the files only have read permission for group
"apache"
john
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 08:09:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I added you and John to the bugzilla group.
I'm still not in the group:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bugzilla]$ groups
levon cvsusers
(despite /etc/group). Furthermore, most of the files are only readable
by group "apache".
john
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:08:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Unfortunately most of the files only have read permission for group
> | "apache"
>
> but not the index file.
That's not much use if it's in a directory I can't read or execute
john
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:39:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I have "look at subversion and try it out" on my agenda.
Please no. You have to install a load of Apache crap (even if you don't
need to use webdav)
john
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:41:57PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> You should be able to access the file now, please tell if there are
> other problems. (there will be)
One thing is that the icons on the simple bug guide are broken...
john
Please, everyone, check out the new front page.
cheers
john
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | One thing is that the icons on the simple bug guide are broken...
>
> right but what is the problem :-)
I just replaced them with text.
john
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:21:18PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> (To make John happy) XForms is stupid and Qt is clever.
Hmmm... you have it half right :)
> XForms has no such magic, so we need to do it ourselves.
> At the moment the XForms frontend supports a single toolbar only and
> both the
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:18:36PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> What are we supposed to look for?
Problems... suggestions...
john
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:42:23PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/
> Click on "simple bug guide"
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/simple-bug-guide.html
> Click on "2. most frequently reported bugs"
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/mostfrequent.cgi
> Click on "Log in" in the bottom,
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I've recently seen a presentation on the subversion/submaster combo and
> I was pretty impressed, especially with it's 'offline capabilities'.
Um, are you sure? AFAIUI subversion has no real support for distributed
development, as
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 11:01:11AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I agree, we should not create a barrier preventing entry of new
> developers... and also avoid annoying existing ones :)
>
> Concerning the requirements of the client, they seem to be:
>
> - APR from apache 2.0
>
> If I u
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:36:30PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> My understanding is that you would use an additional bunch of scripts
> called 'submaster' to do that. I am not sure though, and it might even
> be possible to use 'submaster' together with real CVS.
I see, I hadn't realised there w
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:32:52PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> The SGI C++ compiler errors out because of #warning which is a GCCism.
>
> src/frontends/qt2/QBrowseBox.C needs 'use std::floor' because it makes
> a call to floor().
Your patch seems wrong. All of them should be
#ifdef WITH_WARNING
I want to change the footer on the pages ... can I have write permission
on template/en/default/global/* please?
john
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 09:52:40AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> LyX is Copyright (C) 1995-2004 by the scores of volunteers listed in
Hmm, at least one bit of it wasn't volunteer work :)
john
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 12:48:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> One can always have a big tooltip
There's no such thing as a big tooltip, so to speak...
john
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 01:27:45PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I'd like as soon as possible, but I am a bit unsure of the current
> status.
A bare minimum of 3 months development, 1 months testing away from
release. If we really rattle through the regressions that is
john
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 02:36:44PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> And we probably need that someone begins to compile a list of bugs,
> like Michael did for 1.3.0. I think this was very useful.
I would encourage people to file bugs targetted to 1.4.0 in bugzilla.
There's a few there but I c
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 03:27:39PM +, Andreas Klostermann wrote:
> So do you propose to stop a new discussion in the starts?
> Obviously the GTK version cannot proccess non-English characters. This is a
You're making an assumption that the only way to fix the GTK frontend
bug is to use Pango
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 07:16:25PM +, Andreas Klostermann wrote:
> The big benefit of UTF 8 is that you can use it for everything. No need to
> switch or determine a special encoding. Another big benefit is that it keeps
The encoding of LyX files is a small part of the problem. We also need
t
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:13:07AM +, Andreas Klostermann wrote:
> I believe the complete unicode transition will be a very big step, and can only
> be done if a good number of developers really want it. I am new with lyx
We ALL really want it :)
> development and I didn't produce anything r
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:22:20PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Andre' Alfredo Lgb Jean-Marc
Well, just in case I actually make it for once... assuming "5" is
perfect, "0" is no way:
> 4.7. 2
> (10.7.) 0
> 17.7.3
> (24.7.) 2
> 31.7.0
> [(07.8.)] 3
> [14.8.]
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 12:53:59PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> I came across this link
>
> http://www.asktog.com/columns/022DesignedToGiveFitts.html
A stone cold classic indeed.
You can find some other interesting stuff to read in the same vein via
http://movementarian.org/ui/
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:05:24AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> enabled XWorkArea to use the conventional X11 drawing model. (John,
> do you have it archived, else I'll have to trawl the archives to dig
> it out.)
Sorry, long since lost
john
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 01:04:48PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> // Question: should XScreen::expose always post
> // with x, y relative to the top left corner
> // of the window? The code below would continue
Dunno. If I had
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 03:13:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I've tracked down the first call to paint which is from
> fl_unfreeze_form. I have not been able to ascertain what is calling
> fl_unfreeze_form. Any ideas on how I might? Put that another way. How
> do I tell gdb to stop execution i
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 04:01:02PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> But, you cannot set this breakpoint when the binary is not
> running already. GDB is unable to detect the shared libraries
> which the program depends on. So I do a 'break main' first,
> run the program and set the real breakpoint a
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:55:30PM -0400, Cengiz Gunay wrote:
> 1) Having a concept of LyX log file/window similar to the LaTeX log
>concept.
We already have a "LaTeX errors" dialog box. It could, and should, go
there.
We need to make the following changes:
o) allow our error dialog to have
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:07:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Maybe we should do as John has done in the Qt frontend already and
> > have separate widgets to display messages and to input commands?
>
> Btw, I discovered today that there's a Qt "WidgetStack" (or similar)
> Why don't we use th
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:30:37PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Can someone clued up in Qt ascertain why interaction with the 'sort',
> 'update' or 'document' widgets invokes QRefDialog::changed_adaptor. I
> can see no reason at all, either in the .ui file or in the
> QRefDialog.C, QRef.C files.
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:40:54PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Thanks, John. So what's the recommended strategy to address this?
Manually save and restore the dialog state is the only one I can think
of
john
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 08:23:08AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:07:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > > > Maybe we should do as John has done in the Qt frontend already and
> > > > have separate widgets to display messages and to input commands?
> > >
> > > Bt
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 08:56:53AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Emitted signals disappear into hyperspace if signals are blocked. Note
Are you positive this won't cause problems elsewhere? (timers etc.)
regards
john
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:00:47AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Georg, I don't know where you find the energy to resolve these, truly
> tedious, bugs. Well done!
Amen. I'm really glad George is working so hard on these issues. They're
tricky, and cause real problems for users...
john
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 11:17:05AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> No, I admit I hadn't thought of that. However, there are no timers
> connected to QRefDialogBase::refsLB, referenceED are there?
Well, there's all sorts of internal fun. But if we're works we're
probably* OK
regards
john
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 03:02:26PM +0200, Apache wrote:
> Recent wiki posts:
> (http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Main/AllRecentChanges)
>
> * http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/LyX/Welcome - 14:07 7/05 by
> * http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/LyX/LyX - 14:08 7/05 by
> * http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.p
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 03:12:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Have you really followed development/current status well enought to
> give those numbers?
I'm going by the current state when I test things, my attempts to fix
some stuff, and how long it took to get 1.3.0 out of the door
re
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The problem seems to be related to the use of the "sans" font family
> which is unknown from qt. Could you try the attached patch which has
> been send by Kornel Benko a while ago?
It looks wrong. For starters, these default
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 04:56:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> It looks wrong. For starters, these default aliases should exist
> John> on any sane Qt system using Xft. Secondly, even if they don't
> John> exist, the created font should change to a default, NOT return a
> John> NULL
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:42:58AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> The patch I am using now without any crash is attached. The selected fonts may
> have some unwanted default value, but at least you are then able to select your
> own font with the lyx-UI.
Hmm, that's interesting. Why would fromqstr(
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:05:41PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log message:
> Use the libstdc++ debugging mode if compiling with enable-debug
Umm... when did we fix the multitude of new problems this option caused?
john
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 03:14:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I fixed a lot of them earlier, there were never as many as you
> proclaimed.
OK doke.
john
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:18:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> simple oversight on Qt's part. Has anybody reported this to Qt so
> that they can merge the patch into their sources?
It would be good if somebody did.
> The second change is, IMO, our fault.
I don't believe so. They're the librar
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:45:58PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:18:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > simple oversight on Qt's part. Has anybody reported this to Qt so
> > > that they can merge the patch into their sources?
> >
> > It would be good if somebody did
Has everybody just gone quiet or what? I (and MARC) get no email...
john
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:27:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Would it be Ok if I added these blocks around struct debug_trait?
> Maybe I'll make the macro name more polite ;-)
I'm fairly sure one of the first changes I had rejected by the LyX team
was trying to fix up Qt namespace pollution b
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:13:09PM +0530, Amitabh Trehaan wrote:
> Hi,
> is there any document detailing the internal working of LyX? I am
Not really no.
> particualrly interested in adding another language package (which
> actually uses a preprocessor in LaTeX) to LyX, Something like the
> A
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:46:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Qt has a similar problem with its 'signals' macro and namespace
> boost::signals. Actually, that one is a bit more insidious because we
> #include boost/signals[1-9]*.hpp in lots of other header files, so
> the pollution can pop u
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:18:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Because I was trying to wrap the Qt code inside namespace
> lyx::frontend and got offended by it all.
That's not too hard to do...
> It wasn't me that added this comment:
>
> // Dear Lord, deliver us from Evil,
> // aka the Qt he
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 11:00:13AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> My make of up-to-date LyX-CVS ends with:
Me too (well, something similar) gcc 3.5.0cvs
Didn't spot the problem immediately
john
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 11:56:11AM -0700, Jan Peters wrote:
> When will the next LyX version be released?
>
> Is there a target date, or anything you tell me to hope
> for (like Christmas or so?).
There's no clear date.
(Personal opinion: xmas is hopeful)
john
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 03:46:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not supposed to
> work on it.
Could you clarify what the brackets mean here?
regards
john
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:16:51PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> :-) Does "fatal bugs" say it better? Basically bugs that makes LyX
> unusable.
>
> If it is minor bugs, or bugs that have workarounds then they can wait
> (unless they are regressions at the same time.)
OK
john
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 08:11:13PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I ran this little script over the source to make the changes
> automatically. Patch for 1.4.x is attached. It fixes the problem
> described in the bug report but I think that some Qt guru
> should have a look.
It's fine
john
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:56:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Ok, it must be FreeBSD that is the "problem"
No, I have recently started seeing a very similar problem on Linux.
/usr/local/gcc-cvs/bin/g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src
-I../../../../boost -I/usr/X11R6/include
"
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Sure it did. Or do you have a goblin in your box?
> (you installed gcc 3.5 right? But I don't see these errors with 3.5...)
I previously compiled CVS lyx fine with the same GCC version. A cvs
update then caused it to fail.
>
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:12:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> of gcc or lyx?
lyx
> nothing in lyx/boost changed... automake/autoconf differences?
I haven't changed versions of that.
> Your is some syntax problem, the one on FreeBSD is redefinition of a
> type.
Either way, I can't do
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 05:19:50PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> How can I help when you clam up on the info I need!
What info do you want?
john
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 06:35:15PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> But something _must_ have change I can't belive that it is lyx (sure
> it could be ...)
Nothing's changed, honest. No RPMs have been updated. GCC 3.5 is the one
that previously compiled lyx successfully. LyX is CVS up to date.
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 06:48:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> How updated are your 3.5?
Very. The problem is that the gettext.m4 changes are doing:
typedef int ptrdiff_t
into config.h. However, the check is going wrong because of course
ptrdiff_t is defined fine on my system, so you e
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:46:51PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I can only find ptrdiff_t in linux/types.h and in
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.3.2/include/stddef.h
> (which leads me to suspect your way of calling the compiler...)
>
> It seems that STDC_HEADERS is undefined with y
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 12:31:01AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Ha! I win!
I gracefully concede (this one).
But only because I appear to have burnt my nose.
john
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 07:42:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> (Or do we now require automake > 1.7?) (what version of automake is in
> RH9?)
1.6.3
john
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:38:33AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Ok, thanks. You didn't try the patch did you?
ah, you know me so well
john
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:24:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I have put together some test code to read a child processes stdout,
> stderr and to write data to the child's stdin. Moreover, I've managed to
> do this using C++ streams.
Any reason we're not using one of the existing packages for
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 03:36:51PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Well, I've googled and googled and failed to find anything that can --- in
> a platform independent way --- spawn a child process and communicate with
> it through the child's stdin, stdout, stderr.
What about:
http://pstreams.sour
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 04:23:21PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It seems to be a small world. oprofile is yours. You've contributed to
> pstreams.
Actually, I used to share a house with the author at university. This is
why I know of it :)
> Graydon Hoare who mentions that he's writing somethin
1201 - 1300 of 1772 matches
Mail list logo
