mail archive

1998-11-20 Thread lyx
>From now on, there is a web interface for the archive for our list at http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org For a while it will show the messages posted after my fifth test message on 21 Nov 1998 00:12:24 (GMT). In the next few days I will try to see how I can forward

Re: 1.0.0 rpm

1999-02-03 Thread lyx
t; > > > If it is, something is wrong with your ftp client---try ncftp, mozilla, > > command line ftp, lynx, emacs, etc. > > Yes it is me, using ncftp. What command did you try? ncftp moni.msci.memphis.edu will work so will ncftp ftp://moni.msci.memphis.edu/pub/lyx-1.0.0

list owner on webpage

1999-02-03 Thread lyx
Though I wanted to protect myself a bit, perhaps it is not a bad idea to put the list owners' addresses on the webpage, www.lyx.org. (As we saw, there are extreme cases when people's envelope sender address is such that the sender does not receive mail there. As a consequence, they would never g

archive test

1999-02-17 Thread lyx
archive test

archive test2

1999-02-17 Thread lyx
archive test2

users' list----not

1999-02-28 Thread lyx
I see that there was a misunderstanding. Though I did say the users' list is ready to go, but I still do not have the subscribers' list. This means that you still have to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you want to send a message to the users' list. I'll make an announcement when the switch to the

mailinglist webpage

1999-04-06 Thread lyx
For the users' list, the devel list addresses are given. Also, you might want to put a sentence like this on the page: = Please never send your questions regarding (un)subscription to the lists. If you cannot help yourself by other means, you can always send a message to [E

testing, please ignore

1999-08-11 Thread lyx

Re: LyX 1.1.4fix2 with Sun CC 5.0

2000-03-29 Thread lyx-devel
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 04:07:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Albert" == Albert Chin-A-Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Albert> Just tried compiling lyx 1.1.4fix2 on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC > Albert> 5.0: CC -DHAVE_CONFIG_

Re: LyX 1.1.4fix2 with Sun CC 5.0

2000-03-29 Thread lyx-devel
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > You should try the lyx version from cvs, I think some fixes to these > problems is in there. > > | // Dirty hack to get blue symbols quickly > | - char * sx = s

Re: LyX 1.1.4fix2 with Sun CC 5.0

2000-03-29 Thread lyx-devel
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 06:44:45PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > | On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > | > > | > > | > You should try the lyx version from

Re: "--with-lyxname" is dead ...

2001-01-24 Thread lyx-devel
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:00:03AM +, John Levon wrote: > > ... long live "--with-lyx-suffix" > > IMHO with-lyxname didn't make much sense with things like reLyX > around. > > This patch installs everything nicely, all specific > > ./configure --

Re: 1.1.6fix1 (status update #2)

2001-01-26 Thread lyx-devel
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:06:29PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > - compilation on HP-UX fails for various reasons (vsnprintf, isset() > macro...). Is this on anyone's TODO list? If not, we'll take a look at it. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: 1.1.6fix1 (status update #2) / HP-UX

2001-02-01 Thread lyx-devel
eparate vsnprintf checks: > > 1. Test if the function exists > > 2. Test if the declaration for the function exists > > > > I'm working on this now (just stealing how lftp does it). I should > > have a patch soon. > > > LyX already has something for

HP-UX 10.20 patch for lyx 1.1.6fix1

2001-02-02 Thread lyx-devel
the isset() macro to be included. Renamed isset in src/Variables.h and src/Variables.C to is_set. After building and installing, executing lyx gives: /usr/lib/dld.sl: Call to mmap() failed - TEXT /opt/TWWfsw/libxforms/lib/libforms.sl /usr/lib/dld.sl: Permission denied zsh: abort (core dumped

lib/Makefile.am patch against 1.1.6fix1

2001-02-02 Thread lyx-devel
The configure script for relyx needs to be installed with +x. Out of the box, it is installed as a data file, 644. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- snip snip --- lib/Makefile.am.origFri Feb 2 07:05:07 2001 +++ lib/Makefile.am Fri Feb 2 07:05:36 2001 @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ MAINTAINE

Re: lib/Makefile.am patch against 1.1.6fix1

2001-02-02 Thread lyx-devel
installed these files as +x so I didn't > notice the problem. > > However, this patch is wrong as it breaks --with-lyx-suffix again - these > script names should not be transformed. We need to change the permissions > in the install hook. > > Sorry all, and damn insta

Re: HP-UX 10.20 patch for lyx 1.1.6fix1

2001-02-05 Thread lyx-devel
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 04:45:01PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "lyx-devel" == lyx-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > lyx-devel> 1. Checks if function prototypes for snprintf() and > lyx-devel> vsnprintf() exist. If not, the

Re: HP-UX 10.20 patch for lyx 1.1.6fix1

2001-02-06 Thread lyx-devel
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:21:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "lyx-devel" == lyx-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > lyx-devel> After building and installing, executing lyx gives: > lyx-devel> /usr/lib/dld.sl: Call to mmap() fai

mmap core dump on HP-UX 10.20

2001-02-12 Thread lyx-devel
Disregard my previous message about a core dump error under HP-UX 10.20. I did not have the +x bit set on the libforms.sl file. CVS compiles and runs on 10.20 out of the box. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

CVS fix for po/Makefile.in.in [grep -> egrep]

2001-02-12 Thread lyx-devel
de.m4 === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/config/lyxinclude.m4,v retrieving revision 1.34.2.2 diff -u -3 -p -r1.34.2.2 lyxinclude.m4 --- config/lyxinclude.m42001/01/22 16:09:05 1.34.2.2 +++ config/lyxinclude.m42001/02/13 06:47:24 @@ -967,3 +967,44 @@ if eval

Re: CVS fix for po/Makefile.in.in [grep -> egrep]

2001-02-13 Thread lyx-devel
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 05:36:39PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > 1. Don't assume the system grep understands -E. Use egrep instead. > > Agreed. But do we really need egrep or is grep sufficient? I don't think grep works with '|'. > > 2. Search for n

Re: CVS fix for po/Makefile.in.in [grep -> egrep]

2001-02-16 Thread lyx-devel
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 11:04:54AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 05:36:39PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > 1. Don't assume the system grep understands -E. Use egrep instead.

Re: namespaces

2001-03-17 Thread lyx-devel
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:20:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > What I now need is a poll to see if anonymous namespaces are supported > on the different platforms. > > > So people please test: > > > namespace { > > int foo() { return 1; } > > } > > int main() { > int i = foo

Re: FYI on Solaris lyx does no build when -g is omitted

2001-06-08 Thread lyx-devel
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:03:55AM +0200, Dimitri Papadopoulos wrote: > Hi, > > > I though I would pass this information along so others would know of > > the problem. I was compiling lyx-1.1.6fix2 on a Sun Ultra-60 running > > Solaris 2.6 using gcc 2.95.3 and the ass