Re: Compilation Errors

On 12.05.2011 19:16, Kornel wrote: Am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 12.05.2011 18:04, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear LyX Developers, Is anyone else getting compilation errors on Mac OS X after the cmake directory cleanup? I just merged with the most recent SVN, and this is what

Re: Compilation Errors

Any thoughts as to what I might be doing wrong? Do I need to change the compilation flags? A quick Google search shows that Mac doesn't seem to ship with libintl. Might the configuration on Mac OS X be reverting to the generic Linux? (Sorry, cmake is mostly black magic to me.) Cheers, Rob

Re: r38716 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake

On 12.05.2011 09:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 12/05/11 06:22, kuem...@lyx.org a écrit : Log: cmake: we already test on gettext Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/configCompiler.h.msvc == ---

Re: CMake TODOs

On 12.05.2011 10:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 11/05/11 08:32, Peter Kümmel a écrit : The 3rd variant on Mac OSX is as follows: * lyx binary is named LyX * it resides in bin/Debug for debug configuration, but it's - bin/Release/LyX for release configuration, - bin/MinSizeRel/LyX

Re: Compilation Errors

On 12.05.2011 18:04, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear LyX Developers, Is anyone else getting compilation errors on Mac OS X after the cmake directory cleanup? I just merged with the most recent SVN, and this is what I'm getting (after reconfiguring with cmake):

Re: Compilation Errors

On 12.05.2011 19:16, Kornel wrote: Am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 12.05.2011 18:04, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear LyX Developers, Is anyone else getting compilation errors on Mac OS X after the cmake directory cleanup? I just merged with the most recent SVN, and this is what

Re: Compilation Errors

Any thoughts as to what I might be doing wrong? Do I need to change the compilation flags? A quick Google search shows that Mac doesn't seem to ship with libintl. Might the configuration on Mac OS X be reverting to the generic Linux? (Sorry, cmake is mostly black magic to me.) Cheers, Rob

Re: CMake TODOs

On 11.05.2011 07:26, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 11.05.2011 um 00:02 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 10.05.2011 10:07, Kornel wrote: Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: ... Done. Kornel Good. Found a small issue when compiling with msvc. Peter I have a patch for enabling

Re: Directory cleanup

On 11.05.2011 13:54, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 05/10/2011 08:21 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 10.05.2011 19:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 10/05/11 19:29, Peter Kümmel a écrit : The idea was not to pollute the src dirs because much more than CMakeLists.txt is needed. But I think we could

Re: Directory cleanup

On 11.05.2011 20:19, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Side notes: 1: we should really get rid of boost source. 2: we should really get rid of boost using code whats your solution the problems with tr1::regexp in gcc discussed last time? We could switch to QRegEx. But it's not a

Re: CMake TODOs

Yes, of course. But this is not the solution, isn't it? IMHO, there should be a test for gettext... This would work for all platforms I guess. Stephan We already test on gettext in ConfigureChecks.cmake, so we could simply remove the hard define. But where does gettext comes from on the

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Joost, how do you compile libintl? With Mingw or does it work with msvc? Couldn't we use the libintl shipped with lyx? Peter

Re: CMake TODOs

On 11.05.2011 07:26, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 11.05.2011 um 00:02 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 10.05.2011 10:07, Kornel wrote: Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: ... Done. Kornel Good. Found a small issue when compiling with msvc. Peter I have a patch for enabling

Re: Directory cleanup

On 11.05.2011 13:54, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 05/10/2011 08:21 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 10.05.2011 19:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 10/05/11 19:29, Peter Kümmel a écrit : The idea was not to pollute the src dirs because much more than CMakeLists.txt is needed. But I think we could

Re: Directory cleanup

On 11.05.2011 20:19, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Side notes: 1: we should really get rid of boost source. 2: we should really get rid of boost using code whats your solution the problems with tr1::regexp in gcc discussed last time? We could switch to QRegEx. But it's not a

Re: CMake TODOs

Yes, of course. But this is not the solution, isn't it? IMHO, there should be a test for gettext... This would work for all platforms I guess. Stephan We already test on gettext in ConfigureChecks.cmake, so we could simply remove the hard define. But where does gettext comes from on the

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Joost, how do you compile libintl? With Mingw or does it work with msvc? Couldn't we use the libintl shipped with lyx? Peter

Re: r38678 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake

On 10.05.2011 10:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 10/05/11 10:42, Kornel a écrit : Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2011 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: Why don't you put also all CMakeLists.txtin src/, frontends/ etc? We (Peter and me) wanted to keep the files in extra tree. Why do you want to do that?

Re: r38678 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake

On 10.05.2011 19:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 10/05/11 19:29, Peter Kümmel a écrit : The idea was not to pollute the src dirs because much more than CMakeLists.txt is needed. But I think we could move the CMakeLists.txt into the source dirs and all other files in development/cmake

Directory cleanup

On 10.05.2011 19:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 10/05/11 19:29, Peter Kümmel a écrit : The idea was not to pollute the src dirs because much more than CMakeLists.txt is needed. But I think we could move the CMakeLists.txt into the source dirs and all other files in development/cmake

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 10.05.2011 10:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 07/05/11 13:32, Peter Kümmel a écrit : I think we couldn't do much here. cmake tries to re-use the path to the sources which contain ../.. and replaces them by __/__. But it's internal to cmake. Why is it a problem to you? I find this ugly

Re: CMake TODOs

On 10.05.2011 10:08, Kornel wrote: Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2011 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 09.05.2011 um 23:54 schrieb Kornel: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 09.05.2011 23:26, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Let us delete development/cmake

Re: CMake TODOs

On 10.05.2011 10:07, Kornel wrote: Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: ... Done. Kornel Good. Found a small issue when compiling with msvc. Peter I have a patch for enabling compiled lyx to run from anywhere without need to have sysdir defined. If everything fails

Re: Directory cleanup

On 10.05.2011 22:53, Pavel Sanda wrote: Peter Kümmel wrote: boost and intl is not our code, but it is source code - src/3rdparty/boost src/3rdparty/intl src/cygwin i would expect that src/ contains our code, but no hard opinion. At least we should not have boost and intl

Re: r38678 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake

On 10.05.2011 10:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 10/05/11 10:42, Kornel a écrit : Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2011 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > Why don't you put also all CMakeLists.txtin src/, frontends/ etc? We (Peter and me) wanted to keep the files in extra tree. Why do you want to do

Re: r38678 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake

On 10.05.2011 19:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 10/05/11 19:29, Peter Kümmel a écrit : The idea was not to pollute the src dirs because much more than CMakeLists.txt is needed. But I think we could move the CMakeLists.txt into the source dirs and all other files in development/cmake

Directory cleanup

On 10.05.2011 19:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 10/05/11 19:29, Peter Kümmel a écrit : The idea was not to pollute the src dirs because much more than CMakeLists.txt is needed. But I think we could move the CMakeLists.txt into the source dirs and all other files in development/cmake

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 10.05.2011 10:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 07/05/11 13:32, Peter Kümmel a écrit : I think we couldn't do much here. cmake tries to re-use the path to the sources which contain "../.." and replaces them by "__/__". But it's internal to cmake. Why is it a prob

Re: CMake TODOs

On 10.05.2011 10:08, Kornel wrote: Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2011 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 09.05.2011 um 23:54 schrieb Kornel: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 09.05.2011 23:26, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Let us delete development/cmake

Re: CMake TODOs

On 10.05.2011 10:07, Kornel wrote: Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: ... Done. Kornel Good. Found a small issue when compiling with msvc. Peter I have a patch for enabling compiled lyx to run from anywhere without need to have sysdir defined. If everything fails

Re: Directory cleanup

On 10.05.2011 22:53, Pavel Sanda wrote: Peter Kümmel wrote: boost and intl is not our code, but it is source code -> src/3rdparty/boost src/3rdparty/intl src/cygwin i would expect that src/ contains "our" code, but no hard opinion. At least we should not have b

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 17:24, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 07.05.2011 12:25, Kornel wrote: Ok, we can ask if ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR} equals ${CMAKE_SRC_DIR} Seems we've worked in parallel. But not a problem, mainly I needed a test case for the one-feature-in-a-branch

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel: What we could do, is convert development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt to a something like TopLyx.cmake and include directly in the top-level CMakeLists.txt. Also the add_subdirectory() calls in this TopLyx.cmake has to be

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 21:56, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Could you test attached patch? Would be simpler. Peter Works, but as you say, the binary directory has now this extra development/cmake part. The version I made is not so simple, yes, but works for all versions

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote: Index: development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt === --- development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt(Revision 38662) +++ development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt(Arbeitskopie) @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ include(LyXMacros)

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 04.05.2011 00:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi everyone, As a typical start of a new release cycle I want to poll - what features are a must in the next release; - what work do you think you will be doing; - what do you hope to see somebody else to do (please keep it realistic) ? I will

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 22:30, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote: Index: development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt === --- development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt(Revision 38662

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 22:39, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 09.05.2011 22:30, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote: Index: development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt === --- development/cmake

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 09.05.2011 22:56, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 09.05.2011 um 22:14 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 04.05.2011 00:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi everyone, As a typical start of a new release cycle I want to poll - what features are a must in the next release; - what work do you think you

Re: CMake TODOs

Then our naming is bad. Ignore it (second arguments points to the binary dir) But your patch does not work on windows. Maybe more places to add LYX_CMAKE_DIR. I'll have a look at it. Attached your patch updated. (I wonder why you don't need the same changes) And later we should just move

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 23:04, Kornel wrote: Peter, it works, if you include CMakeLists.txt. But if including say xy.cmake, then the calls have to be like add_subdirectory(development/cmake/po ${TOP_BINARY_DIR}/po) But that will be the second part of my patch. 1.)Rename

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 23:26, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Let us delete development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt and move the code into the master file. yes. Will you do it, or should I? Kornel If you have the time, please do it. I'll test it under Windows. Peter

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 23:54, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 09.05.2011 23:26, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Let us delete development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt and move the code into the master file. yes. Will you do it, or should I

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 17:24, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 07.05.2011 12:25, Kornel wrote: Ok, we can ask if ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR} equals ${CMAKE_SRC_DIR} Seems we've worked in parallel. But not a problem, mainly I needed a test case for the "one-feature-in-a-b

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel: What we could do, is convert development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt to a something like TopLyx.cmake and include directly in the top-level CMakeLists.txt. Also the add_subdirectory() calls in this TopLyx.cmake has to be

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 21:56, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Could you test attached patch? Would be simpler. Peter Works, but as you say, the binary directory has now this extra "development/cmake" part. The version I made is not so simple, yes, but wor

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote: Index: development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt === --- development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt(Revision 38662) +++ development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt(Arbeitskopie) @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ include(LyXMacros)

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 04.05.2011 00:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi everyone, As a typical start of a new release cycle I want to poll - what features are a must in the next release; - what work do you think you will be doing; - what do you hope to see somebody else to do (please keep it realistic) ? I will

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 22:30, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote: Index: development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt === --- development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt(Revision 38662

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 22:39, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 09.05.2011 22:30, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote: Index: development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt === --- development/cmake

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 09.05.2011 22:56, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 09.05.2011 um 22:14 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 04.05.2011 00:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi everyone, As a typical start of a new release cycle I want to poll - what features are a must in the next release; - what work do you think you

Re: CMake TODOs

Then our naming is bad. Ignore it (second arguments points to the binary dir) But your patch does not work on windows. Maybe more places to add LYX_CMAKE_DIR. I'll have a look at it. Attached your patch updated. (I wonder why you don't need the same changes) And later we should just move

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 23:04, Kornel wrote: Peter, it works, if you include CMakeLists.txt. But if including say xy.cmake, then the calls have to be like add_subdirectory(development/cmake/po "${TOP_BINARY_DIR}/po") But that will be the second part of my patch. 1.)Rename

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 23:26, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Let us delete development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt and move the code into the master file. yes. Will you do it, or should I? Kornel If you have the time, please do it. I'll test it under Windows. Peter

Re: CMake TODOs

On 09.05.2011 23:54, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 09.05.2011 23:26, Kornel wrote: Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Let us delete development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt and move the code into the master file. yes. Will you do it, or should I

Re: r38645 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/images/math

On 08.05.2011 22:42, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 8-5-2011 22:39, b...@lyx.org wrote: Author: baum Date: Sun May 8 22:39:22 2011 New Revision: 38645 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38645 Log: Forgot this (why did this file not show up in svn diff?) Because you have to do 'svn

Re: r38645 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/images/math

On 08.05.2011 22:42, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 8-5-2011 22:39, b...@lyx.org wrote: Author: baum Date: Sun May 8 22:39:22 2011 New Revision: 38645 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38645 Log: Forgot this (why did this file not show up in svn diff?) Because you have to do 'svn

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 06.05.2011 11:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 05/05/2011 22:32, Peter Kümmel a écrit : This removes the patch for http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7407 locale_init(); asserts and the try/catch doesn't help. Tried it again, seems I was wrong. The trick is that now locale_init

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 09:45, Kornel wrote: Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2011 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 06.05.2011 um 11:21 schrieb Kornel: Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2011 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 06/05/2011 08:24, Stephan Witt a écrit : * Run in place, without using LYX_DIR_20x copy the resources (bind/

Re: CMake TODOs

Update list, v2 Open a new thread so it doesn't get lost in Goals for 2.1 Defaults: * NLS disabled by default. * Eventually, cmake without option should generate a makefile that has reasonable defaults for everything (nls, spellcheck, build type, ...), at least when released. Help: *

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 11:07, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel: That is exactly, what I am doing Peter. This is the patch. Kornel -set(EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin) -set(LIBRARY_OUTPUT_PATH ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib) +set(EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 10:03, Peter Kümmel wrote: Update list, v2 v3 Open a new thread so it doesn't get lost in Goals for 2.1 Defaults: * NLS disabled by default. * Eventually, cmake without option should generate a makefile that has reasonable defaults for everything (nls, spellcheck

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 11:37, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 07.05.2011 11:07, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel: That is exactly, what I am doing Peter. This is the patch. Kornel -set(EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin) -set(LIBRARY_OUTPUT_PATH

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 11:48, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 07.05.2011 11:37, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 07.05.2011 11:07, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel: That is exactly, what I am doing Peter. This is the patch. Kornel -set(EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 12:25, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 07.05.2011 11:07, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel: That is exactly, what I am doing Peter. This is the patch. Kornel -set(EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin) -set

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 12:25, Kornel wrote: Ok, we can ask if ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR} equals ${CMAKE_SRC_DIR} Seems we've worked in parallel. But not a problem, mainly I needed a test case for the one-feature-in-a-branch workflow. On github is now trunk, https://github.com/syntheticpp/lyx and the

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 06.05.2011 11:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 05/05/2011 21:35, Peter Kümmel a écrit : On 05.05.2011 14:55, Kornel wrote: - NLS disabled by default Formerly it was enabled by default, but after some discussions Peter change it It was too annoying to always having build all the .po

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 06.05.2011 11:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 05/05/2011 22:32, Peter Kümmel a écrit : This removes the patch for http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7407 locale_init(); asserts and the try/catch doesn't help. Tried it again, seems I was wrong. The trick is that now locale_init

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 09:45, Kornel wrote: Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2011 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 06.05.2011 um 11:21 schrieb Kornel: Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2011 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 06/05/2011 08:24, Stephan Witt a écrit : * Run in place, without using LYX_DIR_20x copy the resources (bind/

Re: CMake TODOs

Update list, v2 Open a new thread so it doesn't get lost in Goals for 2.1 Defaults: * NLS disabled by default. * Eventually, cmake without option should generate a makefile that has reasonable defaults for everything (nls, spellcheck, build type, ...), at least when released. Help: *

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 11:07, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel: That is exactly, what I am doing Peter. This is the patch. Kornel -set(EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin) -set(LIBRARY_OUTPUT_PATH ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib) +set(EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 10:03, Peter Kümmel wrote: Update list, v2 v3 Open a new thread so it doesn't get lost in Goals for 2.1 Defaults: * NLS disabled by default. * Eventually, cmake without option should generate a makefile that has reasonable defaults for everything (nls, spellcheck

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 11:37, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 07.05.2011 11:07, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel: That is exactly, what I am doing Peter. This is the patch. Kornel -set(EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin) -set(LIBRARY_OUTPUT_PATH

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 11:48, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 07.05.2011 11:37, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 07.05.2011 11:07, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel: That is exactly, what I am doing Peter. This is the patch. Kornel -set(EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 12:25, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 07.05.2011 11:07, Kornel wrote: Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel: That is exactly, what I am doing Peter. This is the patch. Kornel -set(EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin) -set

Re: CMake TODOs

On 07.05.2011 12:25, Kornel wrote: Ok, we can ask if ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR} equals ${CMAKE_SRC_DIR} Seems we've worked in parallel. But not a problem, mainly I needed a test case for the "one-feature-in-a-branch" workflow. On github is now trunk, https://github.com/syntheticpp/lyx and

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 06.05.2011 11:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 05/05/2011 21:35, Peter Kümmel a écrit : On 05.05.2011 14:55, Kornel wrote: - NLS disabled by default Formerly it was enabled by default, but after some discussions Peter change it It was too annoying to always having build all the .po

Re: Goals for 2.1

And who collects all the ideas from this 100+ thread? When extending the list we should post the complete list. And discussion should not be done within the list. Peter On 06.05.2011 08:22, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijnv...@lyx.org wrote: -

Re: Goals for 2.1

And who collects all the ideas from this 100+ thread? When extending the list we should post the complete list. And discussion should not be done within the list. Peter On 06.05.2011 08:22, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: -

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 05.05.2011 11:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 04/05/11 20:28, José Matos a écrit : On Wednesday 04 May 2011 18:58:34 Peter Kümmel wrote: I assume as long as we have a 80 character limit we will have autotools. ?? I do not follow the logic. :-) I have the impression that often

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 05.05.2011 14:55, Kornel wrote: Am Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2011 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 05/05/11 12:34, Kornel a écrit : What do you miss in cmake? I tried to (somehow) mimic all I was aware of from autotools. It surely is more then 80% ... From the top of my head (I ask for

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 05.05.2011 13:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Here is my patch for included libintl. Part of it is a IMO better fix to the startup assertion encountered with cmake. I guess the code is not linked against libintl, because I get Index: development/cmake/config.h.cmake Index: src/LyX.cpp

CMake TODOs

Open a new thread so it doesn't get lost in Goals for 2.1 Defaults: * NLS disabled by default. * Eventually, cmake without option should generate a makefile that has reasonable defaults for everything (nls, spellcheck, build type, ...), at least when released. Help: * I do not know how

Re: Development of a development model

On 05.05.2011 14:14, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/05/2011 01:00, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete. I'm aware there might be some learning

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 05.05.2011 10:28, Guenter Milde wrote: As language I'd use one of: Lua + small and fast, + used in LuaTeX, so it will become more common and known in the TeX community, + a Lua interpreter can be embedded in LyX with minimal impact on the binary size. Wasn't there

Re: Scripting vs plugins (was RE: Goals for 2.1)

On 05.05.2011 19:26, venom00 wrote: Jean Marc said: The problem with script plugins is that people seem to expect that by linking LyX to python everybody will be able to write python scritps that can manipulate LyX objects natively. I may be missing most of current advancement in programming

Re: Development of a development model

On 05.05.2011 22:11, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 05.05.2011 14:14, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/05/2011 01:00, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 05.05.2011 21:39, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 05.05.2011 13:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Here is my patch for included libintl. Part of it is a IMO better fix to the startup assertion encountered with cmake. I guess the code is not linked against libintl, because I get Index: development

Re: Development of a development model

On 04.05.2011 23:45, Andre Poenitz wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:16:13PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sandasa...@lyx.org wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for non-trivial feature

Re: Development of a development model

On 05.05.2011 23:24, Peter Kümmel wrote: time git clone git://gitorious.org/lyx/lyx.git real2m41.146s Cool, 12 years LyX commits only a mouse click away. And may first commit was on SCons files ;) Peter

Re: CMake TODOs

On 05.05.2011 22:08, Peter Kümmel wrote: Open a new thread so it doesn't get lost in Goals for 2.1 Defaults: * NLS disabled by default. * Eventually, cmake without option should generate a makefile that has reasonable defaults for everything (nls, spellcheck, build type

Re: CMake TODOs

On 05.05.2011 23:37, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 05.05.2011 22:08, Peter Kümmel wrote: Open a new thread so it doesn't get lost in Goals for 2.1 Defaults: * NLS disabled by default. * Eventually, cmake without option should generate a makefile that has reasonable defaults for everything

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 05.05.2011 11:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 04/05/11 20:28, José Matos a écrit : On Wednesday 04 May 2011 18:58:34 Peter Kümmel wrote: I assume as long as we have a 80 character limit we will have autotools. ?? I do not follow the logic. :-) I have the impression that often

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 05.05.2011 14:55, Kornel wrote: Am Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2011 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 05/05/11 12:34, Kornel a écrit : What do you miss in cmake? I tried to (somehow) mimic all I was aware of from autotools. It surely is more then 80% ... From the top of my head (I ask for

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 05.05.2011 13:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Here is my patch for included libintl. Part of it is a IMO better fix to the startup assertion encountered with cmake. I guess the code is not linked against libintl, because I get Index: development/cmake/config.h.cmake Index: src/LyX.cpp

CMake TODOs

Open a new thread so it doesn't get lost in Goals for 2.1 Defaults: * NLS disabled by default. * Eventually, cmake without option should generate a makefile that has reasonable defaults for everything (nls, spellcheck, build type, ...), at least when released. Help: * I do not know how

Re: Development of a development model

On 05.05.2011 14:14, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/05/2011 01:00, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete. I'm aware there might be some learning

Re: Goals for 2.1

On 05.05.2011 10:28, Guenter Milde wrote: As language I'd use one of: Lua + small and fast, + used in LuaTeX, so it will become more common and known in the TeX community, + a Lua interpreter can be embedded in LyX with minimal impact on the binary size. Wasn't there

Re: Scripting vs plugins (was RE: Goals for 2.1)

On 05.05.2011 19:26, venom00 wrote: Jean Marc said: The problem with script plugins is that people seem to expect that by linking LyX to python everybody will be able to write python scritps that can manipulate LyX objects natively. I may be missing most of current advancement in programming

Re: Development of a development model

On 05.05.2011 22:11, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 05.05.2011 14:14, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/05/2011 01:00, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >