On 05/09/2011 02:45 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> Both of those look fine to me.
> OK, I'll put them in. The next po remerge will then create some "new old"
> strings.
>
Thanks.
>> I'm going to look at the other mathed ones, too. It seems prima facie as
>> if they will be good
Richard Heck wrote:
> Both of those look fine to me.
OK, I'll put them in. The next po remerge will then create some "new old"
strings.
> I'm going to look at the other mathed ones, too. It seems prima facie as
> if they will be good for branch at some point, but (a) I'm hoping to
> release 2.0
On 05/09/2011 12:08 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> I was more thinking about the next person. And where I could easily
>> store this.
> It's certainly good to have such stuff centralized. I was just trying to
> excuse my laziness.
>
Isn't laziness the number 1 virtue of a h
Richard Heck wrote:
> I was more thinking about the next person. And where I could easily
> store this.
It's certainly good to have such stuff centralized. I was just trying to
excuse my laziness.
Jürgen
On 05/09/2011 11:09 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> Is there a reason not to commit such a script to development/tools/?
> No. Except that I thought it would be of no use for anybody but me (and now
> you).
>
I was more thinking about the next person. And where I could easil
On 05/09/2011 02:15 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> also this page needs 1.6.10->2.0.1 transition: http://www.lyx.org/I18n
>> some script like
>> cd po; make i18n.inc; cp i18n.inc ../../www/farm/cookbook/LyX/i18n.inc; svn
>> ci do what you want.
> I've done that (and sent Ric
Richard Heck wrote:
> Is there a reason not to commit such a script to development/tools/?
No. Except that I thought it would be of no use for anybody but me (and now
you).
Jürgen
On 05/09/2011 02:09 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> if they will be good for branch at some point, but (a) I'm hoping to
>> release 2.0.1 not that far into the future, since we already have some
>> pretty serious bugs fixed, and (b) these look like fairly minor bugs
>> that could wa
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> On 9-5-2011 8:36, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> But the http://www.lyx.org/I18n-trunk page needs 2.0.0svn -> 2.1.0svn
> transision as well.
> >>>
> >>> when the time comes ;)
> >>
> >> I guess that will be my job by then :S.. Do y
On 9-5-2011 8:36, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
But the http://www.lyx.org/I18n-trunk page needs 2.0.0svn -> 2.1.0svn
transision as well.
>>>
>>> when the time comes ;)
>>
>> I guess that will be my job by then :S.. Do you have a just as nice
>> script for me as Jue
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >> But the http://www.lyx.org/I18n-trunk page needs 2.0.0svn -> 2.1.0svn
> >> transision as well.
> >
> > when the time comes ;)
>
> I guess that will be my job by then :S.. Do you have a just as nice
> script for me as Juergen had for Richard ??
i will send it.
On 9-5-2011 8:19, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> also this page needs 1.6.10->2.0.1 transition: http://www.lyx.org/I18n
>>> some script like
>>> cd po; make i18n.inc; cp i18n.inc ../../www/farm/cookbook/LyX/i18n.inc; svn
>>> ci do what you want.
>>
>> I've
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> when the time comes ;) i already removed it from list on translation page
> since its useful only before new major release - otherwise newbies can
> easily get confused what to translate.
I commented out the link on the I18n page.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > also this page needs 1.6.10->2.0.1 transition: http://www.lyx.org/I18n
> > some script like
> > cd po; make i18n.inc; cp i18n.inc ../../www/farm/cookbook/LyX/i18n.inc; svn
> > ci do what you want.
>
> I've done that (and sent Richard my script).
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> also this page needs 1.6.10->2.0.1 transition: http://www.lyx.org/I18n
> some script like
> cd po; make i18n.inc; cp i18n.inc ../../www/farm/cookbook/LyX/i18n.inc; svn
> ci do what you want.
I've done that (and sent Richard my script).
But the http://www.lyx.org/I18n-trunk p
Richard Heck wrote:
> if they will be good for branch at some point, but (a) I'm hoping to
> release 2.0.1 not that far into the future, since we already have some
> pretty serious bugs fixed, and (b) these look like fairly minor bugs
> that could wait for 2.0.2.
have you already gained po-updates
On 05/08/2011 11:33 AM, Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> I would suppose this one maybe should go to branch?
> IMO it is safe, and JMarc wants it too, so I'll put it in.
>
> BTW, r38584 (recovers lost translations, although a remerge is needed before
> they show up again) and r38640 (bug 7511) are also cand
Richard Heck wrote:
> Georg, I will leave it up to you whether you want to commit tex2lyx
> fixes to branch. It'd be nice to have them, if you think they are safe,
> and, since I do not know this code at all, I'm in no position to make
> that judgement. So please make it for me.
OK.
> I would su
On 05/08/2011 04:23 AM, b...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: baum
> Date: Sun May 8 10:23:42 2011
> New Revision: 38628
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38628
>
> Log:
> Small improvement for bug #7509 as suggested by JMarc
>
Georg, I will leave it up to you whether you want to commit tex2lyx
fix
19 matches
Mail list logo
