Jürgen == Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jürgen Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Actually, I cited the wrong command ( is for a possible line
break without hyphenation).
Jürgen BTW we really should support \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel,
Jürgen and it's really useful.
Indeed.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jürgen BTW we really should support \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel,
Jürgen and it's really useful.
Indeed.
Too late for 1.5? It's a trivial change, but a file format change
nevertheless.
Jürgen
Jürgen == Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jürgen Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: BTW we really should support
Jürgen \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel, and it's really useful.
Indeed.
Jürgen Too late for 1.5? It's a trivial change, but a file format
Jürgen change nevertheless.
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Actually, I cited the wrong command ("" is for a possible line
>> break without hyphenation).
Jürgen> BTW we really should support \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel,
Jürgen> and it's really
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jürgen> BTW we really should support \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel,
> Jürgen> and it's really useful.
>
> Indeed.
Too late for 1.5? It's a trivial change, but a file format change
nevertheless.
Jürgen
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: BTW we really should support
Jürgen> \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel, and it's really useful.
>> Indeed.
Jürgen> Too late for 1.5? It's a trivial change, but a file format
Jürgen> change
baum == baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
baum Author: baum Date: Sat Jan 20 18:21:52 2007 New Revision: 16785
baum URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16785 Log: count
baum correctly
The question here is whether \, is really equivalent to
\textcompwordmark. The definitions are:
[EMAIL
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The question here is whether \, is really equivalent to
\textcompwordmark.
It's definitely not equivalent. IMO, the code in question is plain wrong.
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So the advantage of \, is to produce shorter code, but the output is
different and contains more spacing.
I would be interested to hear german writers' thought on that issue.
I have no idea. I only saw that the counting was wrong, and corrected that.
I use LyX
Jürgen == Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jürgen Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The question here is whether \, is really equivalent to
\textcompwordmark.
Jürgen It's definitely not equivalent. IMO, the code in question is
Jürgen plain wrong.
What is the corresponfing shortcut in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What is the corresponfing shortcut in babel/german? I'd like to see
how it is implemented.
The corresponding shortcut for disabling ligatures? Its
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
while \textcompwordmark is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the case in question, however, I
Jürgen == Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jürgen Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What is the corresponfing shortcut in babel/german? I'd like to see
how it is implemented.
Jürgen The corresponding shortcut for disabling ligatures? Its
Jürgen [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jürgen The corresponding shortcut for disabling ligatures? Its
Jürgen [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jürgen while \textcompwordmark is:
Jürgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, so it is almost the same.
Actually, I cited the wrong command ( is for a possible line break
Jürgen == Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jürgen Actually, I cited the wrong command ( is for a possible line
Jürgen break without hyphenation). This is the correct one:
Jürgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]|}{%
Jürgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jürgen \allowhyphens}{}}
Jürgen Compared to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jürgen But we are talking only about verbatim and only here. I
Jürgen don't see why this could happen.
I am not sure what you mean here. And example (I think) is what the
text in question is inside a section heading.
I mean that the code we are talking about (in
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Actually, I cited the wrong command ( is for a possible line break
without hyphenation).
BTW we really should support \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel, and it's really
useful.
Jürgen
> "baum" == baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
baum> Author: baum Date: Sat Jan 20 18:21:52 2007 New Revision: 16785
baum> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16785 Log: count
baum> correctly
The question here is whether \, is really equivalent to
\textcompwordmark. The definitions are:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The question here is whether \, is really equivalent to
> \textcompwordmark.
It's definitely not equivalent. IMO, the code in question is plain wrong.
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So the advantage of \, is to produce shorter code, but the output is
> different and contains more spacing.
>
> I would be interested to hear german writers' thought on that issue.
I have no idea. I only saw that the counting was wrong, and corrected that.
I use
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> The question here is whether \, is really equivalent to
>> \textcompwordmark.
Jürgen> It's definitely not equivalent. IMO, the code in question is
Jürgen> plain wrong.
What is the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What is the corresponfing shortcut in babel/german? I'd like to see
> how it is implemented.
The corresponding shortcut for disabling ligatures? Its
[EMAIL PROTECTED]""[EMAIL PROTECTED]
while \textcompwordmark is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the case in question,
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What is the corresponfing shortcut in babel/german? I'd like to see
>> how it is implemented.
Jürgen> The corresponding shortcut for disabling ligatures? Its
Jürgen> [EMAIL PROTECTED]""[EMAIL
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jürgen> The corresponding shortcut for disabling ligatures? Its
> Jürgen> [EMAIL PROTECTED]""[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Jürgen> while \textcompwordmark is:
> Jürgen> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> OK, so it is almost the same.
Actually, I cited the wrong command ("" is for a
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Actually, I cited the wrong command ("" is for a possible line
Jürgen> break without hyphenation). This is the correct one:
Jürgen> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"|}{%
Jürgen> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jürgen> \allowhyphens}{}}
Jürgen>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jürgen> But we are talking only about verbatim << and >> only here. I
> Jürgen> don't see why this could happen.
>
> I am not sure what you mean here. And example (I think) is what the
> text in question is inside a section heading.
I mean that the code we are
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Actually, I cited the wrong command ("" is for a possible line break
> without hyphenation).
BTW we really should support \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel, and it's really
useful.
Jürgen
Michael Gerz wrote:
Sure?
Yes!
Looks like 4.
1 is always added somewhere else (this is the common case).
Georg
Michael Gerz wrote:
> Sure?
Yes!
> Looks like 4.
1 is always added somewhere else (this is the common case).
Georg
Sure? Looks like 4.
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: baum
Date: Sat Jan 20 18:21:52 2007
New Revision: 16785
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16785
Log:
count correctly
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/src/paragraph_pimpl.C
Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/paragraph_pimpl.C
URL:
Sure? Looks like 4.
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: baum
Date: Sat Jan 20 18:21:52 2007
New Revision: 16785
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16785
Log:
count correctly
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/src/paragraph_pimpl.C
Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/paragraph_pimpl.C
URL:
30 matches
Mail list logo
