Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
The simple fact that utils in package.C can _exit_ lyx is an interface
violation so please don't try to give me lesson about good interface.
Sigh. There are more interface violations already, e.g. in
src/support/filetools.C
// FIXME Interface violation
#include
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> The simple fact that utils in package.C can _exit_ lyx is an interface
> violation so please don't try to give me lesson about good interface.
Sigh. There are more interface violations already, e.g. in
src/support/filetools.C
// FIXME Interface violation
#include
younes == younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
younes Author: younes Date: Tue Jan 23 13:38:20 2007 New Revision:
younes 16823
younes URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16823 Log: With this
younes commit, errors and warnings can use message box even before
younes LyX is properly initialized.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
younes == younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
younes Author: younes Date: Tue Jan 23 13:38:20 2007 New Revision:
younes 16823
younes URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16823 Log: With this
younes commit, errors and warnings can use message box even before
younes
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would be a regression.
Abdelrazak batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
Abdelrazak regression as the export function don't need any dialog.
So when the debian installer that runs as root uses export to create
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would be a regression.
Abdelrazak batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
Abdelrazak regression as the export function don't need any dialog.
So when the debian installer that runs
Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would be a regression.
Abdelrazak batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
Abdelrazak regression as the export function don't need any dialog.
So when the
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 1:26:49 pm Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
younes == younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
younes Author: younes Date: Tue Jan 23 13:38:20 2007 New Revision:
younes 16823
younes URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16823 Log: With this
José Matos wrote:
I propose a compromise, write the warnings both to lyxerr and to the dialog.
OK
After all you raise a dialog because you thing the issue is sufficiently
important to get one.
Yes.
If the mode is nogui don't raise the dialog. This will please everyone. :-)
Michael Gerz wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would be a regression.
Abdelrazak batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
Abdelrazak regression as the export function don't need any
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak I am just trying to improve the experience of the typical
Abdelrazak user. The typical user won't open a console to launch lyx
Abdelrazak (ether on Windows, Linux or Mac), he will just
Abdelrazak double-click an icon. If there
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would be a regression.
Abdelrazak batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
Abdelrazak regression as the export function don't need any dialog.
So when
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I didn't know that tex2lyx is using the same package.C.in as LyX. Could
we change that?
No, we should not. tex2lyx should use the same package.C, otherwise we
either get a maintenance nightmare or we risk that it uses other
directories.
The fact that you use something
Abdelrazak batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
Abdelrazak regression as the export function don't need any dialog.
Just let you know that I use 'lyx --export pdf2 my.lyx' quite often on
command line, which may or may not have a $DISPLAY (an X-server).
Bo
Georg Baum wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I didn't know that tex2lyx is using the same package.C.in as LyX. Could
we change that?
No, we should not. tex2lyx should use the same package.C, otherwise we
either get a maintenance nightmare or we risk that it uses other
directories.
The fact
Bo Peng wrote:
Abdelrazak batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
Abdelrazak regression as the export function don't need any dialog.
Just let you know that I use 'lyx --export pdf2 my.lyx' quite often on
command line, which may or may not have a $DISPLAY (an X-server).
As I said, my commit did not break that at all.
Then I have no opinion about your changes. :-)
Bo
> "younes" == younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
younes> Author: younes Date: Tue Jan 23 13:38:20 2007 New Revision:
younes> 16823
younes> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16823 Log: With this
younes> commit, errors and warnings can use message box even before
younes> LyX is properly
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"younes" == younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
younes> Author: younes Date: Tue Jan 23 13:38:20 2007 New Revision:
younes> 16823
younes> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16823 Log: With this
younes> commit, errors and warnings can use message box even before
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This would be a regression.
Abdelrazak> batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
Abdelrazak> regression as the export function don't need any dialog.
So when the debian installer that runs as root uses
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This would be a regression.
Abdelrazak> batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
Abdelrazak> regression as the export function don't need any dialog.
So when the debian installer that
Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This would be a regression.
Abdelrazak> batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
Abdelrazak> regression as the export function don't need any dialog.
So
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 1:26:49 pm Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> "younes" == younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > younes> Author: younes Date: Tue Jan 23 13:38:20 2007 New Revision:
> > younes> 16823
> >
> > younes> URL:
José Matos wrote:
I propose a compromise, write the warnings both to lyxerr and to the dialog.
OK
After all you raise a dialog because you thing the issue is sufficiently
important to get one.
Yes.
If the mode is nogui don't raise the dialog. This will please everyone. :-)
Michael Gerz wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This would be a regression.
Abdelrazak> batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
Abdelrazak> regression as the export function don't
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I am just trying to improve the experience of the typical
Abdelrazak> user. The typical user won't open a console to launch lyx
Abdelrazak> (ether on Windows, Linux or Mac), he will just
Abdelrazak> double-click an
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
This would be a regression.
>>
>> Abdelrazak> batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
>> Abdelrazak> regression as the export function
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I didn't know that tex2lyx is using the same package.C.in as LyX. Could
> we change that?
No, we should not. tex2lyx should use the same package.C, otherwise we
either get a maintenance nightmare or we risk that it uses other
directories.
The fact that you use
>> Abdelrazak> batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
>> Abdelrazak> regression as the export function don't need any dialog.
Just let you know that I use 'lyx --export pdf2 my.lyx' quite often on
command line, which may or may not have a $DISPLAY (an X-server).
Bo
Georg Baum wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I didn't know that tex2lyx is using the same package.C.in as LyX. Could
we change that?
No, we should not. tex2lyx should use the same package.C, otherwise we
either get a maintenance nightmare or we risk that it uses other
directories.
The fact
Bo Peng wrote:
>> Abdelrazak> batch mode is only for export up to now. Here there is no
>> Abdelrazak> regression as the export function don't need any dialog.
Just let you know that I use 'lyx --export pdf2 my.lyx' quite often on
command line, which may or may not have a $DISPLAY (an
As I said, my commit did not break that at all.
Then I have no opinion about your changes. :-)
Bo
32 matches
Mail list logo
