Re: [Feature Request] python binding

: "Alex Vergara Gil" Cc: "Richard Heck" ; "lyx-users Users" ; Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments inline Let's see if I understand: -1. You define a *file type* in LyX under Preferences >

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

"Alex Vergara Gil" writes: > From: "Richard Heck" > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM >>> I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via >>> defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which >>> "converts" plantuml source fields into uml graphs, i.e. i

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

From: "Richard Heck" Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM >> I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via >> defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which >> "converts" plantuml source fields into uml graphs, i.e. it defines the >> call to compile the

Re: [Feature Request] quality ePub export: Was [Feature Request] python binding

Hi Steve, I am bringing this back to the lyx-devel list, where it belongs (I responded privately by mistake) On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:55:02 -0500 > stefano franchi wrote: > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Steve Litt > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > Hello Lyxers > > I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code > within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? > This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by > matp

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 04:57 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: "Alex Vergara Gil" writes: Richard you obviously miss the point here, or I was not very clear! it is not a different format, is a facility to have python scripts running within LyX framework, you have to see ipython notebook to understand what I m

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 05:34 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: *From:* Richard Heck *Sent:* Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code wit

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

"Alex Vergara Gil" writes: > From: Richard Heck > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM > > > On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > > Hello Lyxers > > I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of > python code within its own framework, like ipython n

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allow

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package.

[Feature Request] python binding

Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package. I know there already exists a similar binding for R