Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 29.01.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Georg Baum:
>
>> Does anybody give a +1 subsequently for the ACM layout update? If yes, we
>> should update the version numbers of the tex2lyx tests. If not, I propose
>> that Uwe reverts the layout file changes and makes the 504-505 step an
>> em
Am 30.01.2016 um 02:11 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
I propose
that Uwe reverts the layout file changes and makes the 504-505 step an
empty
conversion.
Why? So we want to ship a layout for ACM that nobody can use?
So in fact you are proposing to revert a valid fix the re-enable a
feature of LyX.
Your
Am 29.01.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Georg Baum:
So what are we going to do now?
The tex2lyx tests are currently failing because of wrong versions (I guess
because Guillaume did resolve them with git and did not regenerate them
after merging his patches with the ACM layout update).
I don't understa
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:32:23PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:11:09AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >>
> >> Am I mistaken or nobody gave Uwe the +1 to do this format increment?
> >
> > As discussed in the other thread, you are correct.
>
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:11:09AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>>
>> Am I mistaken or nobody gave Uwe the +1 to do this format increment?
>
> As discussed in the other thread, you are correct.
So what are we going to do now?
The tex2lyx tests are currently failing be
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:11:09AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 27/01/2016 01:58, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
> >commit c1e0b24304e67ede19f30c2ee7498386bfcf6808
> >Author: Uwe Stöhr
> >Date: Wed Jan 27 01:58:13 2016 +0100
> >
> > acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92
> >
> >
Am 27.01.2016 um 08:11 schrieb Guillaume Munch:
Am I mistaken or nobody gave Uwe the +1 to do this format increment?
Scott reported it worked for him and I interpreted it ;-)
Yesterday I had updated my series of patches on tabular-feature from
format 504 to 505, going again carefully through
Am 27.01.2016 um 18:49 schrieb Guillaume Munch:
Uwe, I am worried about this duplicate application of revert_save_props.
Thanks, I fixed this now.
Please, apply the doc updates in a separate commit because they prevent
us from reading the commit log and spotting such errors.
OK.
regards U
Le 27/01/2016 01:58, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
@@ -2239,10 +2343,12 @@ convert = [
[501, [convert_fontsettings]],
[502, []],
[503, []],
- [504, [convert_save_props]]
+ [504, [convert_save_props]],
+ [505, [convert_ACM_siggraph]]
Le 27/01/2016 01:58, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
commit c1e0b24304e67ede19f30c2ee7498386bfcf6808
Author: Uwe Stöhr
Date: Wed Jan 27 01:58:13 2016 +0100
acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92
fileformat change: update fileformat for all files
diff --git a/development/FORMA
10 matches
Mail list logo