Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Should we ditch this ugly test and see what happens?
>
> I think yes, in trunk. At least we could get a testcase, if something breaks
> IMHO.
I commented it out for now. If we do not get any report, I'll remove it
altogether eventually.
Jürgen
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 um 11:57:08, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > I don't know whether it is possible, but is this kind of cases, I would
> > > favor a method: "Inset::forceLatexLanguage()".
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In other words, I don't like testing o
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I don't know whether it is possible, but is this kind of cases, I would
> > favor a method: "Inset::forceLatexLanguage()".
> >
> >
> >
> > In other words, I don't like testing on specific type of insets. IMO,
> > the code must be structured such that we could remov
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I don't know whether it is possible, but is this kind of cases, I would
> favor a method: "Inset::forceLatexLanguage()".
>
> In other words, I don't like testing on specific type of insets. IMO,
> the code must be structured such that we could remove the InsetArg
Op 27-12-2012 11:05, Juergen Spitzmueller schreef:
The branch, master, has been updated.
- Log -
commit 258280cecf0cf2e1f31e7f9136165a7dc494192d
Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
Date: Thu Dec 27 11:05:39 2012 +0100
Do not forc
