Bo Peng schrieb:
I'd prefer a name that does not look like an environment name,
Good idea!
like "--Separator--" or "--Splitter--".
Either is fine to me, so I can go with --Separator--.
Michael, what do you think?
Me? Both is fine to me. But I also like "-- Environment Separator --".
Mich
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Yes, I think so. Please, let me know what you think about the updated
> patch using the brilliant solution by JMarc.
I like it. Put it in.
Jürgen
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:26:45PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Bo Peng wrote:
>
> > Patch submitted, please test or read user's guide, section 3.4.4.
>
> Enrico, you might use this Split environment instead of the clumsy ERT in
> the IEEEtran template (last section).
Yes, I think so. P
Bo Peng wrote:
> Patch submitted, please test or read user's guide, section 3.4.4.
Enrico, you might use this Split environment instead of the clumsy ERT in
the IEEEtran template (last section).
Jürgen
Either is fine to me, so I can go with --Separator--.
Patch submitted, please test or read user's guide, section 3.4.4.
I did not wait longer because lyx2lyx was not usable due to a bug
introduced by my previous patch.
Cheers,
Bo
I'd prefer a name that does not look like an environment name,
Good idea!
like "--Separator--" or "--Splitter--".
Either is fine to me, so I can go with --Separator--.
Michael, what do you think?
Bo
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Now a small question, do we want to call it SplitLayout?
I'd prefer a name that does not look like an environment name, like
"--Separator--" or "--Splitter--".
JMarc
Bo Peng schrieb:
Please give it a day to hear other suggestion tomorrow commit the
most voted
version. :-)
OK.
SplitEnvironment, +1
+1
Michael
Please give it a day to hear other suggestion tomorrow commit the most voted
version. :-)
OK.
SplitEnvironment, +1
Because we call the topleft dropbox "the Environment box".
Bo
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 18:51:33 Bo Peng wrote:
> I am fine with SplitEnvironment. I choose layout because it is shorter.
>
> Bo
Please give it a day to hear other suggestion tomorrow commit the most voted
version. :-)
--
José Abílio
Now a small question, do we want to call it SplitLayout?
I am fine with SplitEnvironment. I choose layout because it is shorter.
Bo
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 18:18:24 Bo Peng wrote:
> > I will let Jose decide on this.
>
> Jose, have you decided on this one? Can SplitLayout go in?
What follows is my rationale to approve this feature. As I have expressed my
earlier concerns in the thread I hope that this feature does not become
I will let Jose decide on this.
Jose, have you decided on this one? Can SplitLayout go in?
Bo
On 6/9/07, Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:49:13AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
...
> +def revert_splitlayout(document):
> +r''' Revert SplitLayout to a lyx node
> +From
That would be 'note'
Will be corrected when applied.
Thanks.
Bo
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:49:13AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
...
> +def revert_splitlayout(document):
> +r''' Revert SplitLayout to a lyx node
> +From
That would be 'note'
...
- Martin
Bo Peng wrote:
Herbert> The current behaviour is easy!
But not so easy for lyx newbies. The question is: what to insert that
do not show up in the screen output (better latex output), yet split
the environment? I remember that it took me 10 minutes to figure that
out a few years ago.
And, as I'v
I prefer normalsize roman font and red (like beamer pause/endFrame) or blue
(like pagebreak).
That will be the attached, which has the following style entry:
Style SplitLayout
KeepEmpty 1
MarginDynamic
LatexType Paragraph
Bo Peng wrote:
> I prefer a smaller font so I used typewriter, Tiny, with color latex.
I prefer normalsize roman font and red (like beamer pause/endFrame) or blue
(like pagebreak).
> The style name is more difficult to decide.
>
> End environment is appropriate because another type of environmen
The attached patch adds SplitLayout environment to a few layout/inc
files that will end up in almost all layouts.
I see from this thread that most people like to have this in. Attached
is an updated patch. I put this layout to stdlayout.inc so that it
will show up in almost all layouts.
The onl
LeftMargin"xxx"
I also dislike this because this makes it impossible to see the
environment depth of this layout.
Cheers,
Bo
Style "End Environment"
CopyStyle Standard
KeepEmpty 1
LeftMargin"xxx"
LabelType Static
LabelString "--End environment--"
LabelFont
Series Bold
Bo Peng wrote:
>> Herbert> The current behaviour is easy!
>
> But not so easy for lyx newbies. The question is: what to insert that
> do not show up in the screen output (better latex output), yet split
> the environment? I remember that it took me 10 minutes to figure that
> out a few years ago.
OK, I am fed up about this whining "people do not like my features,
they do not like me".
It sounds like Friday, doesn't it. :-)
It is quite OK that we have different opinions, and it is OK to me
that my proposal is rejected by the majority. Although I respect your
(and Jose's) worry about futu
Herbert> The current behaviour is easy!
But not so easy for lyx newbies. The question is: what to insert that
do not show up in the screen output (better latex output), yet split
the environment? I remember that it took me 10 minutes to figure that
out a few years ago.
Cheers,
Bo
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I agree with Jean-Marc on this one. If the intention is to split an
>> environment, the tool used should visually express that.
Herbert> The current behaviour is easy!
I think so too.
JMarc
Martin Vermeer wrote:
>>> I would advise against that. People will use it as a word-like "put
>>> multiple cariage return to do my page layout" feature and then
>>> complain that it does not show on screen.
>> two major facts:
>>
>> 1. TeX knows no space ... it is used to split words
>> 2. TeX kn
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> it is not _easily_ possible to get more than one empty line
Herbert> without this layout. After return you are in standard layout
Herbert> mode! If you want another empty line you have to choose again
Herbert> standard (empty).
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Herbert> two major facts:
>
> Herbert> 1. TeX knows no space ... it is used to split words 2. TeX
> Herbert> knows no empty lines ... it is used to split paragraphs
>
> Herbert> If you do not know these
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:22:44 +0200
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>> what you need is nothing else than an empty line inside LyX and
> >>> this is pretty easy with
> >>>
> >>> Style "Standa
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> two major facts:
Herbert> 1. TeX knows no space ... it is used to split words 2. TeX
Herbert> knows no empty lines ... it is used to split paragraphs
Herbert> If you do not know these facts, you cannot understand TeX and
Herber
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> what you need is nothing else than an empty line inside LyX and
>>> this is pretty easy with
>>>
>>> Style "Standard(Keep)" CopyStyle Standard KeepEmpty 1 End
>>>
>>> in stdclass.inc
>
> Andre> Good idea
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> what you need is nothing else than an empty line inside LyX and
>> this is pretty easy with
>>
>> Style "Standard(Keep)" CopyStyle Standard KeepEmpty 1 End
>>
>> in stdclass.inc
Andre> Good idea.
Andre> Jose': Ok to prepare a patch
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 09:25:07AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Bo Peng wrote:
> > I can not believe that I am hitting a second WONTFIX in two days, but
> > this is likely the fate of this patch.
> >
> > The attached patch adds SplitLayout environment to a few layout/inc
> > files that will end up
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> I can not believe that I am hitting a second WONTFIX in two days,
Bo> but this is likely the fate of this patch.
Bo> The patch also contains UserGuide.lyx and lyx2lyx changes. If you
Bo> like it, please make your voice heard. I need four posi
Bo Peng wrote:
> I can not believe that I am hitting a second WONTFIX in two days, but
> this is likely the fate of this patch.
>
> The attached patch adds SplitLayout environment to a few layout/inc
> files that will end up in almost all layouts. This environment does
> not output anything but en
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
I need four positive votes to
outnumber our future-oriented masters (who consider this as a useless
ugly hack).
I like it. And the future work needed to get to that "box-based" solution
will be substantial.
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> I can not believe that I am hitting a second WONTFIX in two days, but
> this is likely the fate of this patch.
>
> The attached patch adds SplitLayout environment to a few layout/inc
> files that will end up in almost all layouts. This env
37 matches
Mail list logo
