On Sunday 03 June 2007 22:46:42 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Looks like a reasonable idea.
>
> JMarc
+1
--
José Abílio
> "Richard" == Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> The attached patch addresses this bug. The idea is to leave
Richard> the TOC, and all other "buffer dependent" dialogs, open when
Richard> closing one buffer, if there is still one open.
Richard> Abdel said he was OK with this p
The attached patch addresses this bug. The idea is to leave the TOC, and
all other "buffer dependent" dialogs, open when closing one buffer, if
there is still one open.
Abdel said he was OK with this patch if I could prove it didn't crash
anything. I've tried to do so by opening every dialog
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch addresses this bug. The idea is to leave the TOC
(e.g.) open when closing one buffer, if there is still one open.
>>> Instead, I think we should rather make the TOC non b
Richard Heck wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch addresses this bug. The idea is to leave the TOC
(e.g.) open when closing one buffer, if there is still one open.
Instead, I think we should rather make the TOC non buffer-dependant.
But it's not just the TOC.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch addresses this bug. The idea is to leave the TOC
(e.g.) open when closing one buffer, if there is still one open.
Instead, I think we should rather make the TOC non buffer-dependant.
But it's not just the TOC. The real question is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Richard> The attached patch addresses this bug. The idea is to leave
Richard> the TOC (e.g.) open when closing one buffer, if there is
Richard> still one open.
What are the FIXME comments good for?
Sorry, they weren't meant to be committed. I had several different
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch addresses this bug. The idea is to leave the TOC
(e.g.) open when closing one buffer, if there is still one open.
This seems slightly dangerous, so I won't push to commit this now,
though if people think it's a good idea and it seems safe, then we
could. Fo
> "Richard" == Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> The attached patch addresses this bug. The idea is to leave
Richard> the TOC (e.g.) open when closing one buffer, if there is
Richard> still one open.
What are the FIXME comments good for?
JMarc
The attached patch addresses this bug. The idea is to leave the TOC
(e.g.) open when closing one buffer, if there is still one open.
This seems slightly dangerous, so I won't push to commit this now,
though if people think it's a good idea and it seems safe, then we
could. For what it's worth, th
10 matches
Mail list logo
