Re: [PATCH] CT 17 (or is it 16?)

2006-05-31 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> depm with CT activated won't be more tricky than depm etc Michael> without CT. In the end, CT should not disturb other LyX Michael> features. OK, we'll see that when your patch is in. JMarc

Re: [PATCH] CT 17 (or is it 16?)

2006-05-30 Thread Michael Gerz
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Michael> FYI: We do not track removals of leading spaces: I think that we should track them (qnd other depm tricks). depm with CT activated won't be more tricky than depm etc without CT. In the end, CT should not disturb other LyX features. Tracking removals of

Re: [PATCH] CT 17 (or is it 16?)

2006-05-29 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> FYI: We do not track removals of leading spaces: I think that we should track them (qnd other depm tricks). JMarc

[PATCH] CT 17 (or is it 16?)

2006-05-29 Thread Michael Gerz
FYI: We do not track removals of leading spaces: Michael Index: paragraph.C === --- paragraph.C (Revision 13940) +++ paragraph.C (Arbeitskopie) @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ int i = 0; while (!empty() && (isNewline(0) || isLine