On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 02:19:56PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
John OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably
John related to the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen
John object (so before we were effectively masking this behaviour)
I do not have much to
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably related to
| the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen object (so before we
| were effectively masking this behaviour)
How much does it cost?
--
Lgb
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:48:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably related to
| the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen object (so before we
| were effectively masking this behaviour)
How much does it cost?
It is
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:48:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably related to
| the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen object (so before we
| were effectively masking this
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 02:19:56PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably
> John> related to the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen
> John> object (so before we were effectively masking this behaviour)
>
> I do not have
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably related to
| the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen object (so before we
| were effectively masking this behaviour)
How much does it cost?
--
Lgb
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:48:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably related to
> | the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen object (so before we
> | were effectively masking this behaviour)
>
> How much does it cost?
It
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:48:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably related to
>> | the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen object (so before we
>> | were effectively masking
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably
John related to the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen
John object (so before we were effectively masking this behaviour)
I do not have much to say on the subject either,
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably
John> related to the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen
John> object (so before we were effectively masking this behaviour)
I do not have much to say on the
OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably related to
the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen object (so before we
were effectively masking this behaviour)
john
Index: BufferView_pimpl.C
===
RCS file:
OK ? I don't know exactly why this works, but it is probably related to
the change where we don't re-create our lyxscreen object (so before we
were effectively masking this behaviour)
john
Index: BufferView_pimpl.C
===
RCS file:
12 matches
Mail list logo