On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:38:50PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 03:23:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
So I call others to test it.
Can you make a clean diff against current CVS and I will test it.
Here is a new patch and a test file.
Note that preparing this test file I
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:59:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
Here is a new patch and a test file.
I am building now.
Looking at the patch I have a couple of minor comments ...
+ // check if the float type exist
+ if (argument == figure) {
I guess one day we will
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:59:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
So I call others to test it.
What sense does it make to be able to toggle default placement and also
set left/middle/right ? I don't get it.
Where's the menu entry for inserting a new floatingfigure ?
john
--
Please let's not
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 06:10:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:59:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
So I call others to test it.
What sense does it make to be able to toggle default placement and also
set left/middle/right ? I don't get it.
This is an error.
The
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:32:27PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
Looking at the patch I have a couple of minor comments ...
+ // check if the float type exist
+ if (argument == figure) {
I guess one day we will support floatingtable ??
Perhaps.
{
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:38:50PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 03:23:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > So I call others to test it.
>
> Can you make a clean diff against current CVS and I will test it.
Here is a new patch and a test file.
Note that preparing this test
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:59:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Here is a new patch and a test file.
I am building now.
Looking at the patch I have a couple of minor comments ...
+ // check if the float type exist
+ if (argument == "figure") {
I guess one day we
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:59:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > So I call others to test it.
What sense does it make to be able to toggle default placement and also
set left/middle/right ? I don't get it.
Where's the menu entry for inserting a new floatingfigure ?
john
--
"Please let's
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 06:10:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:59:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > > > So I call others to test it.
>
> What sense does it make to be able to toggle default placement and also
> set left/middle/right ? I don't get it.
This is an
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:32:27PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Looking at the patch I have a couple of minor comments ...
>
> + // check if the float type exist
> + if (argument == "figure") {
>
> I guess one day we will support floatingtable ??
Perhaps.
>
>
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:27:01PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:09:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Here is a patch :)
| Can I apply it ?
No.
| Why?
Untested. Make others test it verify that lyx
Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
Perhaps... I do not expect to find a lot of 1.1.6 lyx files that used
floatflt...
| Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
| it.
I can
On 29-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
| it.
I can agree with that.
It's the same for the indented paragraphs also. We droped that too and it doesn't
seem someone wants it back (appart from me as I think it's
Juergen It's the same for the indented paragraphs also. We droped that too and it
doesn't
Juergen seem someone wants it back (appart from me as I think it's pretty usefull,
but one
Juergen can always use an office software ;)
he you are not the only one! But one can always drop LyX in favor
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 03:23:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
So I call others to test it.
Can you make a clean diff against current CVS and I will test it.
Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
it.
You are probably right after all
thanks
john
--
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:27:01PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:09:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> | Here is a patch :)
> >> | Can I apply it ?
> >>
> >> No.
> >
> | Why?
>
> Untested. Make others test
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
>>
>> Perhaps... I do not expect to find a lot of 1.1.6 lyx files that used
>> floatflt...
>
| Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
|
On 29-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
>| it.
>
> I can agree with that.
It's the same for the indented paragraphs also. We droped that too and it doesn't
seem someone wants it back (appart from me as I think
Juergen> It's the same for the indented paragraphs also. We droped that too and it
doesn't
Juergen> seem someone wants it back (appart from me as I think it's pretty usefull,
but one
Juergen> can always use an office software ;)
he you are not the only one! But one can always drop LyX in favor
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 03:23:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> So I call others to test it.
Can you make a clean diff against current CVS and I will test it.
> Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
> it.
You are probably right after all
thanks
john
--
Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:09:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Here is a patch :)
| Can I apply it ?
No.
| Why?
Untested. Make others test it verify that lyx files form 1.1.6 load
correctly. Then if all tests work out we can commit it.
|
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:49:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
The patch to UPGRADING:
... LyX 1.2.0 does not handle correctly older files. After the upgrade,
you will need to spend several hours to manually fix your files.
But LyX 1.2.0 is so wonderful, so it is worth your time!
Not too bad
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:09:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Here is a patch :)
>> | Can I apply it ?
>>
>> No.
>
| Why?
Untested. Make others test it verify that lyx files form 1.1.6 load
correctly. Then if all tests work out we can commit
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:49:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The patch to UPGRADING:
>
> ... LyX 1.2.0 does not handle correctly older files. After the upgrade,
> you will need to spend several hours to manually fix your files.
> But LyX 1.2.0 is so wonderful, so it is worth your time!
Not too
Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:44:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Why we don't have a floatingfigure inset ?
Because you have not created one.
| Here is a patch :)
| Can I apply it ?
No.
--
Lgb
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:09:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Here is a patch :)
| Can I apply it ?
No.
Why?
Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:14:08PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
Is it ? What's wrong exactly ?
Don't we want 1.2.0 to come out ??
john
--
Taste is predicated on discrimination.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:18:01PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:14:08PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
Is it ? What's wrong exactly ?
If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0 will
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:23:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0 will read is as
a standard figure. Therefore, the DVI output will be wrong.
This is not my definition of very bad to be honest. I think a patch
to UPGRADING would be much better
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:28:18PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:23:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0 will read is as
a standard figure. Therefore, the DVI output will be wrong.
This is not my definition of very
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:49:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
The patch to UPGRADING:
... LyX 1.2.0 does not handle correctly older files. After the upgrade,
you will need to spend several hours to manually fix your files.
But LyX 1.2.0 is so wonderful, so it is worth your time!
Oh come on,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:52:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:49:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
The patch to UPGRADING:
... LyX 1.2.0 does not handle correctly older files. After the upgrade,
you will need to spend several hours to manually fix your files.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:54:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
If this is such a big issue why didn't you do this patch 6 months or a
year ago ?
I wasn't aware of the problem
You really managed to miss all the extra par stuff getting removed ??
didn't have time.
well ... it's not my
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:44:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >
>> | Why we don't have a floatingfigure inset ?
>>
>> Because you have not created one.
>
| Here is a patch :)
| Can I apply it ?
No.
--
Lgb
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:09:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Here is a patch :)
> | Can I apply it ?
>
> No.
Why?
Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:14:08PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
Is it ? What's wrong exactly ?
Don't we want 1.2.0 to come out ??
john
--
"Taste is predicated on discrimination."
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:18:01PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:14:08PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
>
> Is it ? What's wrong exactly ?
If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:23:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0 will read is as
> a standard figure. Therefore, the DVI output will be wrong.
This is not my definition of "very bad" to be honest. I think a patch
to UPGRADING would be much
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:28:18PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:23:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0 will read is as
> > a standard figure. Therefore, the DVI output will be wrong.
>
> This is not my definition
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:49:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The patch to UPGRADING:
>
> ... LyX 1.2.0 does not handle correctly older files. After the upgrade,
> you will need to spend several hours to manually fix your files.
> But LyX 1.2.0 is so wonderful, so it is worth your time!
Oh
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:52:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:49:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > The patch to UPGRADING:
> >
> > ... LyX 1.2.0 does not handle correctly older files. After the upgrade,
> > you will need to spend several hours to manually fix your
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:54:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > If this is such a big issue why didn't you do this patch 6 months or a
> > year ago ?
>
> I wasn't aware of the problem
You really managed to miss all the extra par stuff getting removed ??
> didn't have time.
well ... it's not
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt} itself for the old extra para
stuff.
Please apply !
john
--
I continue to be amazed at what Andrei can make
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt} itself for the old extra para
stuff.
| Please apply !
done.
--
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 11:04:10AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt} itself for the old extra para
stuff.
Please apply
Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 11:04:10AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt} itself for the
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:41:55PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
Why we don't have a floatingfigure inset ?
because nobody's coded it yet ?
john
--
I continue to be amazed at what Andrei can make templates do. Some of it
still makes my head hurt.
- Herb Sutter
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
> assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt} itself for the old extra para
> stuff.
Please apply !
john
--
"I continue to be amazed at what Andrei can make
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
>> Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
>> assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt} itself for the old extra para
>> stuff.
>
| Please apply !
done.
--
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 11:04:10AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> > Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
> > assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt} itself for the old extra para
> > stuff.
>
>
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 11:04:10AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>>
>> > Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
>> > assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt}
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:41:55PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Why we don't have a floatingfigure inset ?
because nobody's coded it yet ?
john
--
"I continue to be amazed at what Andrei can make templates do. Some of it
still makes my head hurt."
- Herb Sutter
52 matches
Mail list logo
