Le 10/11/2023 à 12:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:55:56AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
PS: I have to admit that I have a kink with weird uses of preprocessor
macros: https://gitlab.inria.fr/lasgoutt/parameters
Funny, I found # and ## operators very handy for
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:55:56AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> PS: I have to admit that I have a kink with weird uses of preprocessor
> macros: https://gitlab.inria.fr/lasgoutt/parameters
Funny, I found # and ## operators very handy for writing commandline
parameter parsing via simple
Le 09/11/2023 à 21:54, José Matos a écrit :
On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 20:34 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Looks reasonable. Pavel
I agree.
After so many dark spells I fear for Jean-Marc's sanity. :-D
You mean that I should not rewrite parts of LyX in preprocessor macros
as I intended to?
JMarc
On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 20:34 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Looks reasonable. Pavel
I agree.
After so many dark spells I fear for Jean-Marc's sanity. :-D
--
José Abílio
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 06:21:03PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thoughts?
Looks reasonable. Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Le 08/11/2023 à 22:50, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
We have to do something for this annoying warning. What about the following?
If it works why not. I stopped following that gcc bug, but last time I looked
they gcc devs seemed convinced that false-positive ratio is small enough that
they will not
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 06:09:44PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 22/11/2022 ?? 03:04, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 01:47:26AM +, José Matos wrote:
> >>On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 23:08 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >>>Can you try whether the attached changes anything? P
>
Le 22/11/2022 à 03:04, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 01:47:26AM +, José Matos wrote:
On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 23:08 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Can you try whether the attached changes anything? P
It does, now those attached are what remains.
Nice, so now we know the
