Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com writes: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. If you are unsure, just increase the format, just for the case.

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes jean-marc.lasgout...@inria.fr writes: This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is installed, of course). The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

rgheck writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. >>> >>> If you are unsure, just increase the format,

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: > This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is > installed, of course). > > The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know > whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes jean-marc.lasgout...@inria.fr writes: This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is installed, of course). The attached patch fixes the recognition of the module by adding a new feature one can test against: from-to, wheich tests whether the is a

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes jean-marc.lasgout...@inria.fr writes: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes jean-marc.lasgout...@inria.fr writes: This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is installed, of course). The attached patch fixes the recognition of the module by adding a new feature

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: > This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is > installed, of course). The attached patch fixes the recognition of the module by adding a new "feature" one can test against: from->to, wheich tests whether the

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: > >> This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is >> installed, of course). > > The attached patch fixes the recognition of the module by adding a

[PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is installed, of course). The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. Thoughts? svndiff Index:

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is installed, of course). Looks good. The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is installed, of course). The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. I think

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. If you are unsure, just increase the format, just for the case. But then I have to update layout2layout, and I do not know how.

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. If you are unsure, just increase the format, just for the case. But then I have to update layout2layout,

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

rgheck wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. If you are unsure, just increase the format, just for the case. But then I have to update

[PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is installed, of course). The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. Thoughts? svndiff Index:

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is > installed, of course). Looks good. > The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know > whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have > nothing to update

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: This patch allows the sweave module to work our of the box (when R is installed, of course). The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. I think

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. If you are unsure, just increase the format, just for the case. But then I have to update layout2layout, and I do not know how.

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. If you are unsure, just increase the format, just for the case. But then I have to update layout2layout,

Re: [PATCH] outputformat tag for literate programming

rgheck wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: The only reason why I did not commit it yet is that I do not know whether I have to increase the layout format, considering that I have nothing to update here. If you are unsure, just increase the format, just for the case. But then I have to update