Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-21 Thread Richard Heck
Georg Baum wrote: Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2007 18:45 schrieb Richard Heck: So resultdir should be set if and only if the converter creates a directory by itself. Please make sure that this does work in combination with usetempdir, or make these two flags mutually exclusive (since

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-21 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Richard Heck wrote: Georg Baum wrote: Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2007 18:45 schrieb Richard Heck: So resultdir should be set if and only if the converter creates a directory by itself. Please make sure that this does work in combination with usetempdir, or make these two flags mutually exclusive

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-21 Thread Richard Heck
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Richard Heck wrote: I wonder whether I should just commit the patch as-is, thus fixing HTML output and ViewHTML for 1.5.0, and do something about cleaning this code up more generally after 1.5.0 is out. My thought is just that changing how convert() works more

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-21 Thread Richard Heck
Georg Baum wrote: > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2007 18:45 schrieb Richard Heck: > > So resultdir should be set if and only if the > converter creates a directory by itself. Please make sure that this does > work in combination with usetempdir, or make these two flags mutually > exclusive (since

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-21 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Richard Heck wrote: Georg Baum wrote: Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2007 18:45 schrieb Richard Heck: So resultdir should be set if and only if the converter creates a directory by itself. Please make sure that this does work in combination with usetempdir, or make these two flags mutually exclusive

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-21 Thread Richard Heck
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: >> I wonder whether I should just commit the patch as-is, thus fixing HTML >> output and View>HTML for 1.5.0, and do something about cleaning this >> code up more generally after 1.5.0 is out. My thought is just that >> changing how convert() works

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-20 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2007 18:45 schrieb Richard Heck: Georg Baum wrote: A flag for the name of that directory does already exist: resultdir. Please use that instead of /path/file.html.conversion/. I could be wrong, but this seems to do something else. /path/file.html.conversion/ is

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-20 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2007 18:45 schrieb Richard Heck: > Georg Baum wrote: > > A flag for the name of that directory does already exist: resultdir. Please > > use that instead of /path/file.html.conversion/. > > > I could be wrong, but this seems to do something else. >

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-19 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote:   This area looks a mess and I have never quite understood it completely. :-) That is I why I am asking for Georg's help to decide on this. The same applies to Jürgen. I'll wait for them to look at it. It looks o.k. to me, but I'm not too deep into the converter

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-19 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 18. Mai 2007 21:14 schrieb José Matos: On Friday 18 May 2007 7:42:56 pm Richard Heck wrote: The attached patch addresses these bugs, all of which have to do with export, viewing, and the like---ultimately, with the conversion routines. The patch introduces a new conversion

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-19 Thread Richard Heck
Thanks, Georg, for the comments. I'll take these into account and re-work the code a bit. If you can point me towards the resultfile flag in your playground, I'll have a look at that, too, though perhaps not immediately, as there are more pressing bugs to fix before 1.5.rc1. Richard Georg Baum

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-19 Thread Richard Heck
Georg Baum wrote: So, if you open /path/file.lyx and FileExportFormat, you will get a directory /path/file.format.conversion/ in which all the files generated by the converter will be found (e.g. the mess that htlatex generates ends up in/path/file.html.conversion/). A flag for the

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-19 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: > >   This area looks a mess and I have never quite understood it completely. > > :-) That is I why I am asking for Georg's help to decide on this. The > > same applies to Jürgen. > > I'll wait for them to look at it. It looks o.k. to me, but I'm not too deep into the

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-19 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 18. Mai 2007 21:14 schrieb José Matos: > On Friday 18 May 2007 7:42:56 pm Richard Heck wrote: > > The attached patch addresses these bugs, all of which have to do with > > export, viewing, and the like---ultimately, with the conversion > > routines. The patch introduces a new

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-19 Thread Richard Heck
Thanks, Georg, for the comments. I'll take these into account and re-work the code a bit. If you can point me towards the resultfile flag in your playground, I'll have a look at that, too, though perhaps not immediately, as there are more pressing bugs to fix before 1.5.rc1. Richard Georg Baum

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-19 Thread Richard Heck
Georg Baum wrote: >>> So, if you open >>> /path/file.lyx and File>Export>Format, you will get a directory >>> /path/file.format.conversion/ in which all the files generated by the >>> converter will be found (e.g. the mess that htlatex generates ends up >>> in/path/file.html.conversion/). >>>

[PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-18 Thread Richard Heck
Any comments on this? Anyone care to test it? If you like ExportHTML or ViewHTML, you are going to like this The attached patch addresses these bugs, all of which have to do with export, viewing, and the like---ultimately, with the conversion routines. The patch introduces a new

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-18 Thread José Matos
On Friday 18 May 2007 7:42:56 pm Richard Heck wrote: Any comments on this? Anyone care to test it? If you like ExportHTML or ViewHTML, you are going to like this I did not forgot it, I was thinking. I am slow at times. ;-) The attached patch addresses these bugs, all of which

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-18 Thread Richard Heck
José Matos wrote: On Friday 18 May 2007 7:42:56 pm Richard Heck wrote: Any comments on this? Anyone care to test it? If you like ExportHTML or ViewHTML, you are going to like this I did not forgot it, I was thinking. I am slow at times. ;-) No problem. I know you have a few

[PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-18 Thread Richard Heck
Any comments on this? Anyone care to test it? If you like Export>HTML or View>HTML, you are going to like this The attached patch addresses these bugs, all of which have to do with export, viewing, and the like---ultimately, with the conversion routines. The patch introduces a new

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-18 Thread José Matos
On Friday 18 May 2007 7:42:56 pm Richard Heck wrote: > Any comments on this? Anyone care to test it? If you like Export>HTML or > View>HTML, you are going to like this I did not forgot it, I was thinking. I am slow at times. ;-) > > > The attached patch addresses these bugs, all of

Re: [PATCH-again] Bugs 643, 3047, and 3090

2007-05-18 Thread Richard Heck
José Matos wrote: > On Friday 18 May 2007 7:42:56 pm Richard Heck wrote: > >> Any comments on this? Anyone care to test it? If you like Export>HTML or >> View>HTML, you are going to like this >> > I did not forgot it, I was thinking. I am slow at times. ;-) > No problem. I know