Jose' Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right?
No, it was a bit more.
The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following:
- fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Here is an updated patch. It fixes the problem that the TOC
Georg files were not automatically generated for the distribution.
Georg The Makefile now works both for srcdir=builddir and
Georg srcdir!=builddir.
Georg I plan to do the following:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Georg == Georg Baum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Georg - remove *TOC.lyx from CVS - add Makefile.depend to CVS (not
Georg needed for GNU make, but might be needed for other flavours of
Georg make) - apply the patch
Georg Is this OK?
Yes.
Ok, it is in. I
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Jose' Matos wrote:
>> > Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right?
>>
>> No, it was a bit more.
>> The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following:
>> - fix wrong syntax in
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Here is an updated patch. It fixes the problem that the TOC
Georg> files were not automatically generated for the distribution.
Georg> The Makefile now works both for srcdir=builddir and
Georg> srcdir!=builddir.
Georg> I plan to do
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> - remove *TOC.lyx from CVS - add Makefile.depend to CVS (not
> Georg> needed for GNU make, but might be needed for other flavours of
> Georg> make) - apply the patch
>
> Georg> Is this
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right?
No, it was a bit more.
The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following:
- fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and it_Userguide
Are
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
> > Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right?
>
> No, it was a bit more.
> The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following:
> - fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and it_Userguide
Jose' Matos wrote:
Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right?
No, it was a bit more.
The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following:
- fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and it_Userguide
- change the build system so that the TOC files are generated
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg python is now required if building from CVS, because I included
Georg Makefile.depend in Makefile.am.
What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist? How
do you bootstrap? Shouldn't we distribute this file in CVS?
JMarc
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote:
Comments?
I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you
noticed it?
Index: LyX.py
===
RCS file:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist?
GNU make issues a warning that it does not exist and creates it.
How
do you bootstrap? Shouldn't we distribute this file in CVS?
I don't know if the behaviour of GNU make is standard. If not we
Jose' Matos wrote:
I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you
noticed it?
No. What does happen without the patch?
Georg
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Georg python is now required if building from CVS, because I included
| Georg Makefile.depend in Makefile.am.
|
| What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist? How
| do you
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Hmm... I don't think we want this Makefile.depend thingie at
Lars all.
So, how would you do that? Is there some way to reuse automake's dependency
tracking code?
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 15:24, Georg Baum wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you
noticed it?
No. What does happen without the patch?
It does not work. :-)
Because the table that holds the relation is reversed, each time
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| |
| | Georg python is now required if building from CVS, because I included
| | Georg Makefile.depend in Makefile.am.
| |
| | What happens at
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right?
No, it was a bit more.
The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following:
- fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and it_Userguide
- change the build system so that the TOC files are generated
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> python is now required if building from CVS, because I included
Georg> Makefile.depend in Makefile.am.
What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist? How
do you bootstrap? Shouldn't we distribute this file in
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> Comments?
I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you
noticed it?
Index: LyX.py
===
RCS file:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist?
GNU make issues a warning that it does not exist and creates it.
> How
> do you bootstrap? Shouldn't we distribute this file in CVS?
I don't know if the behaviour of GNU make is standard. If not
Jose' Matos wrote:
> I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you
> noticed it?
No. What does happen without the patch?
Georg
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Georg> python is now required if building from CVS, because I included
| Georg> Makefile.depend in Makefile.am.
|
| What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist?
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Hmm... I don't think we want this Makefile.depend thingie at
Lars> all.
So, how would you do that? Is there some way to reuse automake's dependency
tracking code?
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 15:24, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
> > I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you
> > noticed it?
>
> No. What does happen without the patch?
It does not work. :-)
Because the table that holds the relation is reversed,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| |
| | Georg> python is now required if building from CVS, because I included
| | Georg> Makefile.depend in Makefile.am.
| |
| |
On Monday 19 September 2005 12:51, Georg Baum wrote:
What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and
found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not generated
by doc_toc.py.
As I told bellow this was done to avoid a run time dependency on python.
Jose' == Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
4. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at build
time
Jose' This option implies that you have to use python for
Jose' installation. Certainly I don't mind. ;-)
or
5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Monday 19 September 2005 12:51, Georg Baum wrote:
What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and
found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not
generated by doc_toc.py.
As I told bellow this was done to avoid a run time
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 12:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at make dist
time
This would avoid python for installation.
Now, it is your choice. :-)
At least for 1.4 that is probably a good thing to do.
JMarc
--
José
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at make dist
time
This would avoid python for installation.
This is the best solution IMO if the premise is to have no python build
dependency. I'll prepare a patch.
Georg
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at make
dist time
This would avoid python for installation.
Georg This is the best solution IMO if the premise is to have no
Georg python build
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Thanks. It would be nice to make it work when building outside of the
source tree, but I guess this is optional.
Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it.
JMarc
--
José Abílio
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Thanks. It would be nice to make it work when building outside of the
source tree, but I guess this is optional.
Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it.
Some people (including me)
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:15, Georg Baum wrote:
Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it.
Some people (including me) like to build outside the source tree...
That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what can be
done.
Georg
--
José
Am Dienstag, 20. September 2005 19:37 schrieb Jose' Matos:
That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what
can be
done.
I already did it - patch follows later after some testing.
Georg
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 19:16, Georg Baum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 20. September 2005 19:37 schrieb Jose' Matos:
That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what
can be
done.
I already did it - patch follows later after some testing.
Passing as destination dir as
On Monday 19 September 2005 12:51, Georg Baum wrote:
> What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and
> found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not generated
> by doc_toc.py.
As I told bellow this was done to avoid a run time dependency on python.
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 4. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at build
>> time
Jose'> This option implies that you have to use python for
Jose'> installation. Certainly I don't mind. ;-)
or
5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Monday 19 September 2005 12:51, Georg Baum wrote:
>> What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and
>> found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not
>> generated by doc_toc.py.
>
> As I told bellow this was done to avoid a
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 12:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at "make dist"
> time
>
> This would avoid python for installation.
Now, it is your choice. :-)
At least for 1.4 that is probably a good thing to do.
> JMarc
--
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at "make dist"
> time
>
> This would avoid python for installation.
This is the best solution IMO if the premise is to have no python build
dependency. I'll prepare a patch.
Georg
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at "make
>> dist" time
>>
>> This would avoid python for installation.
Georg> This is the best solution IMO if the premise is to have no
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thanks. It would be nice to make it work when building outside of the
> source tree, but I guess this is optional.
Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it.
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Thanks. It would be nice to make it work when building outside of the
>> source tree, but I guess this is optional.
>
> Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it.
Some people
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:15, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it.
>
> Some people (including me) like to build outside the source tree...
That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what can be
done.
> Georg
--
Am Dienstag, 20. September 2005 19:37 schrieb Jose' Matos:
> That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what
can be
> done.
I already did it - patch follows later after some testing.
Georg
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 19:16, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 20. September 2005 19:37 schrieb Jose' Matos:
> > That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what
>
> can be
>
> > done.
>
> I already did it - patch follows later after some testing.
Passing as
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Am Freitag, 16. September 2005 16:31 schrieb Jean-Marc
Georg Lasgouttes:
Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py.
Georg Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the
Georg documents that are not yet
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Georg This patch fixes them, can it go in?
I think it can.
It is in now.
What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and
found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not generated
by doc_toc.py. doc_toc.py puts the
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: This patch fixes them, can it go
Georg in?
I think it can.
Georg It is in now. What shall we do with the original patch? I did
Georg some further research and found out that the *_TOC.lyx
Georg documents in the
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Am Freitag, 16. September 2005 16:31 schrieb Jean-Marc
Georg> Lasgouttes:
>> Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py.
Georg> Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the
Georg> documents
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Georg> This patch fixes them, can it go in?
>
> I think it can.
It is in now.
What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and
found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not generated
by doc_toc.py. doc_toc.py puts the
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: This patch fixes them, can it go
Georg> in?
>> I think it can.
Georg> It is in now. What shall we do with the original patch? I did
Georg> some further research and found out that the *_TOC.lyx
Georg>
Am Freitag, 16. September 2005 16:31 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py.
Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the documents
that are not yet translated, but there are also two bugs in lyx2lyx.
This patch fixes
Georg Baum wrote:
Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py.
Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the documents
that are not yet translated, but there are also two bugs in lyx2lyx.
This patch fixes them, can it go in?
I understand that
On Sunday 18 September 2005 10:18, Angus Leeming wrote:
I understand that string.strip(foo) is deprecated in favour of foo.strip().
Ditto with string.split(foo).
http://docs.python.org/lib/node110.html
José, why do we continue to use the deprecated versions? Support for
ancient Pythons?
For me that is a burden, the absence of the extended operators in python
(+=, -=, ... op=) makes the code dull, the fact that string were made a first
class type only in python 2.0 does not help either.
What? += and string class is not in 1.5.2? I use it a lot in configure.py.
If you are
On Sunday 18 September 2005 19:55, Bo Peng wrote:
For me that is a burden, the absence of the extended operators in
python (+=, -=, ... op=) makes the code dull, the fact that string were
made a first class type only in python 2.0 does not help either.
What? += and string class is not in
Am Freitag, 16. September 2005 16:31 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py.
Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the documents
that are not yet translated, but there are also two bugs in lyx2lyx.
This patch fixes
Georg Baum wrote:
>> Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py.
> Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the documents
> that are not yet translated, but there are also two bugs in lyx2lyx.
> This patch fixes them, can it go in?
I understand that
On Sunday 18 September 2005 10:18, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> I understand that string.strip(foo) is deprecated in favour of foo.strip().
> Ditto with string.split(foo).
>
> http://docs.python.org/lib/node110.html
>
> José, why do we continue to use the deprecated versions? Support for
> ancient
> For me that is a burden, the absence of the extended operators in python
> (+=, -=, ... op=) makes the code dull, the fact that string were made a first
> class type only in python 2.0 does not help either.
What? += and string class is not in 1.5.2? I use it a lot in configure.py.
> If you
On Sunday 18 September 2005 19:55, Bo Peng wrote:
> > For me that is a burden, the absence of the extended operators in
> > python (+=, -=, ... op=) makes the code dull, the fact that string were
> > made a first class type only in python 2.0 does not help either.
>
> What? += and string class
Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details.
This patch repairs the documents, but does not fix the original lyx2lyx bug.
OK to apply?
GeorgIndex: lib/doc/ChangeLog
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See
Georg http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This
Georg patch repairs the documents, but does not fix the original
Georg lyx2lyx bug.
Georg OK to apply?
No,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Georg == Georg Baum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Georg Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See
Georg http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This
Georg patch repairs the documents, but does not fix the original
Georg
Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details.
This patch repairs the documents, but does not fix the original lyx2lyx bug.
OK to apply?
GeorgIndex: lib/doc/ChangeLog
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See
Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This
Georg> patch repairs the documents, but does not fix the original
Georg> lyx2lyx bug.
Georg> OK to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See
> Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This
> Georg> patch repairs the documents, but does not
70 matches
Mail list logo
