Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-28 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote: Jose' Matos wrote: Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right? No, it was a bit more. The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following: - fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg Here is an updated patch. It fixes the problem that the TOC Georg files were not automatically generated for the distribution. Georg The Makefile now works both for srcdir=builddir and Georg srcdir!=builddir. Georg I plan to do the following:

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-28 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg - remove *TOC.lyx from CVS - add Makefile.depend to CVS (not Georg needed for GNU make, but might be needed for other flavours of Georg make) - apply the patch Georg Is this OK? Yes. Ok, it is in. I

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-28 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: > On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote: >> Jose' Matos wrote: >> > Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right? >> >> No, it was a bit more. >> The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following: >> - fix wrong syntax in

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Here is an updated patch. It fixes the problem that the TOC Georg> files were not automatically generated for the distribution. Georg> The Makefile now works both for srcdir=builddir and Georg> srcdir!=builddir. Georg> I plan to do

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-28 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Georg" == Georg Baum >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: > > Georg> - remove *TOC.lyx from CVS - add Makefile.depend to CVS (not > Georg> needed for GNU make, but might be needed for other flavours of > Georg> make) - apply the patch > > Georg> Is this

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-22 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote: Jose' Matos wrote: Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right? No, it was a bit more. The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following: - fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and it_Userguide Are

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-22 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote: > Jose' Matos wrote: > > Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right? > > No, it was a bit more. > The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following: > - fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and it_Userguide

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right? No, it was a bit more. The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following: - fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and it_Userguide - change the build system so that the TOC files are generated

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg python is now required if building from CVS, because I included Georg Makefile.depend in Makefile.am. What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist? How do you bootstrap? Shouldn't we distribute this file in CVS? JMarc

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote: Comments? I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you noticed it? Index: LyX.py === RCS file:

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist? GNU make issues a warning that it does not exist and creates it. How do you bootstrap? Shouldn't we distribute this file in CVS? I don't know if the behaviour of GNU make is standard. If not we

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you noticed it? No. What does happen without the patch? Georg

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Georg python is now required if building from CVS, because I included | Georg Makefile.depend in Makefile.am. | | What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist? How | do you

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars Hmm... I don't think we want this Makefile.depend thingie at Lars all. So, how would you do that? Is there some way to reuse automake's dependency tracking code?

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 15:24, Georg Baum wrote: Jose' Matos wrote: I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you noticed it? No. What does happen without the patch? It does not work. :-) Because the table that holds the relation is reversed, each time

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | | Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | | | Georg python is now required if building from CVS, because I included | | Georg Makefile.depend in Makefile.am. | | | | What happens at

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: > Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right? No, it was a bit more. The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following: - fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and it_Userguide - change the build system so that the TOC files are generated

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> python is now required if building from CVS, because I included Georg> Makefile.depend in Makefile.am. What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist? How do you bootstrap? Shouldn't we distribute this file in

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote: > > Comments? I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you noticed it? Index: LyX.py === RCS file:

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist? GNU make issues a warning that it does not exist and creates it. > How > do you bootstrap? Shouldn't we distribute this file in CVS? I don't know if the behaviour of GNU make is standard. If not

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: > I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you > noticed it? No. What does happen without the patch? Georg

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Georg> python is now required if building from CVS, because I included | Georg> Makefile.depend in Makefile.am. | | What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist?

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Hmm... I don't think we want this Makefile.depend thingie at Lars> all. So, how would you do that? Is there some way to reuse automake's dependency tracking code?

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 15:24, Georg Baum wrote: > Jose' Matos wrote: > > I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you > > noticed it? > > No. What does happen without the patch? It does not work. :-) Because the table that holds the relation is reversed,

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | | > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | | | Georg> python is now required if building from CVS, because I included | | Georg> Makefile.depend in Makefile.am. | | | |

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 19 September 2005 12:51, Georg Baum wrote: What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not generated by doc_toc.py. As I told bellow this was done to avoid a run time dependency on python.

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jose' == Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 4. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at build time Jose' This option implies that you have to use python for Jose' installation. Certainly I don't mind. ;-) or 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: On Monday 19 September 2005 12:51, Georg Baum wrote: What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not generated by doc_toc.py. As I told bellow this was done to avoid a run time

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 12:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at make dist  time This would avoid python for installation. Now, it is your choice. :-) At least for 1.4 that is probably a good thing to do. JMarc -- José

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at make dist time This would avoid python for installation. This is the best solution IMO if the premise is to have no python build dependency. I'll prepare a patch. Georg

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at make dist time This would avoid python for installation. Georg This is the best solution IMO if the premise is to have no Georg python build

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Thanks. It would be nice to make it work when building outside of the source tree, but I guess this is optional. Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it. JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Thanks. It would be nice to make it work when building outside of the source tree, but I guess this is optional. Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it. Some people (including me)

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:15, Georg Baum wrote: Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it. Some people (including me) like to build outside the source tree... That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what can be done. Georg -- José

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Georg Baum
Am Dienstag, 20. September 2005 19:37 schrieb Jose' Matos: That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what can be done. I already did it - patch follows later after some testing. Georg

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 19:16, Georg Baum wrote: Am Dienstag, 20. September 2005 19:37 schrieb Jose' Matos: That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what can be done. I already did it - patch follows later after some testing. Passing as destination dir as

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 19 September 2005 12:51, Georg Baum wrote: > What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and > found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not generated > by doc_toc.py. As I told bellow this was done to avoid a run time dependency on python.

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 4. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at build >> time Jose'> This option implies that you have to use python for Jose'> installation. Certainly I don't mind. ;-) or 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: > On Monday 19 September 2005 12:51, Georg Baum wrote: >> What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and >> found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not >> generated by doc_toc.py. > > As I told bellow this was done to avoid a

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 12:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at "make dist" >  time > > This would avoid python for installation. Now, it is your choice. :-) At least for 1.4 that is probably a good thing to do. > JMarc --

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at "make dist" > time > > This would avoid python for installation. This is the best solution IMO if the premise is to have no python build dependency. I'll prepare a patch. Georg

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at "make >> dist" time >> >> This would avoid python for installation. Georg> This is the best solution IMO if the premise is to have no

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Thanks. It would be nice to make it work when building outside of the > source tree, but I guess this is optional. Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it. > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Thanks. It would be nice to make it work when building outside of the >> source tree, but I guess this is optional. > > Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it. Some people

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:15, Georg Baum wrote: > > > Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it. > > Some people (including me) like to build outside the source tree... That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what can be done. > Georg --

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Georg Baum
Am Dienstag, 20. September 2005 19:37 schrieb Jose' Matos: > That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what can be > done. I already did it - patch follows later after some testing. Georg

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 19:16, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 20. September 2005 19:37 schrieb Jose' Matos: > > That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what > > can be > > > done. > > I already did it - patch follows later after some testing. Passing as

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg Am Freitag, 16. September 2005 16:31 schrieb Jean-Marc Georg Lasgouttes: Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py. Georg Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the Georg documents that are not yet

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-19 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Georg This patch fixes them, can it go in? I think it can. It is in now. What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not generated by doc_toc.py. doc_toc.py puts the

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: This patch fixes them, can it go Georg in? I think it can. Georg It is in now. What shall we do with the original patch? I did Georg some further research and found out that the *_TOC.lyx Georg documents in the

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Am Freitag, 16. September 2005 16:31 schrieb Jean-Marc Georg> Lasgouttes: >> Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py. Georg> Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the Georg> documents

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-19 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Georg> This patch fixes them, can it go in? > > I think it can. It is in now. What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not generated by doc_toc.py. doc_toc.py puts the

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: This patch fixes them, can it go Georg> in? >> I think it can. Georg> It is in now. What shall we do with the original patch? I did Georg> some further research and found out that the *_TOC.lyx Georg>

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-18 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 16. September 2005 16:31 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py. Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the documents that are not yet translated, but there are also two bugs in lyx2lyx. This patch fixes

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-18 Thread Angus Leeming
Georg Baum wrote: Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py. Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the documents that are not yet translated, but there are also two bugs in lyx2lyx. This patch fixes them, can it go in? I understand that

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-18 Thread Jose' Matos
On Sunday 18 September 2005 10:18, Angus Leeming wrote: I understand that string.strip(foo) is deprecated in favour of foo.strip(). Ditto with string.split(foo). http://docs.python.org/lib/node110.html José, why do we continue to use the deprecated versions? Support for ancient Pythons?

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-18 Thread Bo Peng
For me that is a burden, the absence of the extended operators in python (+=, -=, ... op=) makes the code dull, the fact that string were made a first class type only in python 2.0 does not help either. What? += and string class is not in 1.5.2? I use it a lot in configure.py. If you are

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-18 Thread Jose' Matos
On Sunday 18 September 2005 19:55, Bo Peng wrote: For me that is a burden, the absence of the extended operators in python (+=, -=, ... op=) makes the code dull, the fact that string were made a first class type only in python 2.0 does not help either. What? += and string class is not in

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-18 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 16. September 2005 16:31 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py. Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the documents that are not yet translated, but there are also two bugs in lyx2lyx. This patch fixes

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-18 Thread Angus Leeming
Georg Baum wrote: >> Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py. > Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the documents > that are not yet translated, but there are also two bugs in lyx2lyx. > This patch fixes them, can it go in? I understand that

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-18 Thread Jose' Matos
On Sunday 18 September 2005 10:18, Angus Leeming wrote: > > I understand that string.strip(foo) is deprecated in favour of foo.strip(). > Ditto with string.split(foo). > > http://docs.python.org/lib/node110.html > > José, why do we continue to use the deprecated versions? Support for > ancient

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-18 Thread Bo Peng
> For me that is a burden, the absence of the extended operators in python > (+=, -=, ... op=) makes the code dull, the fact that string were made a first > class type only in python 2.0 does not help either. What? += and string class is not in 1.5.2? I use it a lot in configure.py. > If you

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-18 Thread Jose' Matos
On Sunday 18 September 2005 19:55, Bo Peng wrote: > > For me that is a burden, the absence of the extended operators in > > python (+=, -=, ... op=) makes the code dull, the fact that string were > > made a first class type only in python 2.0 does not help either. > > What? += and string class

[patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-16 Thread Georg Baum
Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This patch repairs the documents, but does not fix the original lyx2lyx bug. OK to apply? GeorgIndex: lib/doc/ChangeLog

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See Georg http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This Georg patch repairs the documents, but does not fix the original Georg lyx2lyx bug. Georg OK to apply? No,

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-16 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See Georg http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This Georg patch repairs the documents, but does not fix the original Georg

[patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-16 Thread Georg Baum
Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This patch repairs the documents, but does not fix the original lyx2lyx bug. OK to apply? GeorgIndex: lib/doc/ChangeLog

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This Georg> patch repairs the documents, but does not fix the original Georg> lyx2lyx bug. Georg> OK to

Re: [patch] fix broken documents in lib/doc

2005-09-16 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Georg" == Georg Baum >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: > > Georg> Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See > Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This > Georg> patch repairs the documents, but does not