The phantom feature is a math feature
No, \phantom, \vphantom and \hphantom are general (plain TeX) commands, which
also work outside mathed (I use them from time to time).
I know and use them often e.g. also in the EmbeddedObjects manual. But the suport for these comands
is at the moment
>> The phantom feature is a math feature
>
> No, \phantom, \vphantom and \hphantom are general (plain TeX) commands, which
> also work outside mathed (I use them from time to time).
I know and use them often e.g. also in the EmbeddedObjects manual. But the suport for these comands
is at the
Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as
expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not
oppose it.
The phantom feature is a math feature so it should be accessible via the
math toolbar. The math toolbar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
The phantom feature is a math feature
No, \phantom, \vphantom and \hphantom are general (plain TeX) commands, which
also work outside mathed (I use them from time to time).
I never thought about that... But of course you are right.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I never thought about that... But of course you are right.
I think ui-wise, phantoms should be implemented in a forthcoming InsetSpace
dialog (in Texted).
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I never thought about that... But of course you are right.
I think ui-wise, phantoms should be implemented in a forthcoming InsetSpace
dialog (in Texted).
Good idea. A dialog like:
_ short space
_ interword space
_ enskip
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I never thought about that... But of course you are right.
I think ui-wise, phantoms should be implemented in a forthcoming InsetSpace
dialog (in Texted).
Where would you put the text?
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Where would you put the text?
Like Helge outlined. The dialog would include a combo with all the predefined
spaces (enspace etc.), then custom for a length (\hspace) and a widget for
text (Space in the length of
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Where would you put the text?
Like Helge outlined. The dialog would include a combo with all the predefined
spaces (enspace etc.), then custom for a length (\hspace) and a widget for
text (Space in the length of the following string).
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This is not good. The text should be any possible Text Inset (even a
font change would make the metrics bad).
Then we need Tommaso's input widget (or a collapsable).
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This is not good. The text should be any possible Text Inset (even a
font change would make the metrics bad).
Then we need Tommaso's input widget (or a collapsable).
A collapsable separate from the space inset would
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:40:19AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as
expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not
oppose it.
The phantom feature is a math feature
No,
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as
>> expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not
>> oppose it.
>
> The phantom feature is a math feature so it should be accessible via the
> math toolbar. The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
>> The phantom feature is a math feature
>
> No, \phantom, \vphantom and \hphantom are general (plain TeX) commands, which
> also work outside mathed (I use them from time to time).
I never thought about that... But of course you are right.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I never thought about that... But of course you are right.
I think ui-wise, phantoms should be implemented in a forthcoming InsetSpace
dialog (in Texted).
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I never thought about that... But of course you are right.
I think ui-wise, phantoms should be implemented in a forthcoming InsetSpace
dialog (in Texted).
Good idea. A dialog like:
_ short space
_ interword space
_ enskip
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I never thought about that... But of course you are right.
>
> I think ui-wise, phantoms should be implemented in a forthcoming InsetSpace
> dialog (in Texted).
Where would you put the text?
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Where would you put the text?
>
> Like Helge outlined. The dialog would include a combo with all the predefined
> spaces (enspace etc.), then custom for a length (\hspace) and a widget for
> text ("Space in the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Where would you put the text?
Like Helge outlined. The dialog would include a combo with all the predefined
spaces (enspace etc.), then custom for a length (\hspace) and a widget for
text ("Space in the length of the following string").
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This is not good. The text should be any possible Text Inset (even a
> font change would make the metrics bad).
Then we need Tommaso's input widget (or a collapsable).
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> This is not good. The text should be any possible Text Inset (even a
>> font change would make the metrics bad).
>
> Then we need Tommaso's input widget (or a collapsable).
A collapsable separate from the space inset
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:40:19AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > > I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as
> > > expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not
> > > oppose it.
> >
> > The phantom feature is a math
was the change from math-insert
\choose to math-insert \binom intentional? And if so, why?
This is intended because LyX 1.6.0 will have \tbinom and \dbinom. So it will be confusing that the
standard binom command is \choose. \choose is identic to \binom.
OK I'll postpone this change to LyX
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
OK I'll postpone this change to LyX 1.6.0.
Yes, please.
Jürgen
OK I'll postpone this change to LyX 1.6.0.
Yes, please.
What about the other changes (fraction, placeholders)?
Uwe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What about the other changes (fraction, placeholders)?
The fraction changes are OK. For the placeholders, I'd like to have some input
from math users first.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What about the other changes (fraction, placeholders)?
The fraction changes are OK. For the placeholders, I'd like to have some
input
from math users first.
I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies
I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as
expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not
oppose it.
The phantom feature is a math feature so it should be accessible via the
math toolbar. The math toolbar contains much more expert stuff than
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as
expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not
oppose it.
The phantom feature is a math feature
No, \phantom, \vphantom and \hphantom are general (plain TeX) commands, which
also
> was the change from "math-insert
> \choose" to "math-insert \binom" intentional? And if so, why?
This is intended because LyX 1.6.0 will have \tbinom and \dbinom. So it will be confusing that the
standard binom command is \choose. \choose is identic to \binom.
OK I'll postpone this change to
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> OK I'll postpone this change to LyX 1.6.0.
Yes, please.
Jürgen
>> OK I'll postpone this change to LyX 1.6.0.
>
> Yes, please.
What about the other changes (fraction, placeholders)?
Uwe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> What about the other changes (fraction, placeholders)?
The fraction changes are OK. For the placeholders, I'd like to have some input
from math users first.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> What about the other changes (fraction, placeholders)?
>
> The fraction changes are OK. For the placeholders, I'd like to have some
> input
> from math users first.
I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it
I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as
expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not
oppose it.
The phantom feature is a math feature so it should be accessible via the
math toolbar. The math toolbar contains much more expert stuff than
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as
> > expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not
> > oppose it.
>
> The phantom feature is a math feature
No, \phantom, \vphantom and \hphantom are general (plain TeX) commands,
The attached patch registeres placeholders to the math toolbar and clarify some
entries.
OK for branch?
regards Uwe
p.s. lyx.org is currently dead
Index: stdtoolbars.inc
===
--- stdtoolbars.inc (revision 21421)
+++ stdtoolbars.inc
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:33:59PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The attached patch registeres placeholders to the math toolbar and clarify
some entries.
OK for branch?
regards Uwe
p.s. lyx.org is currently dead
In deep coma. But I did get a commit through...
- Martin
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The attached patch registeres placeholders to the math toolbar and clarify
some entries. OK for branch?
As I'm no math user, I do not have strong opinions. I guess \phantom is
useful. Is it also often used? What do others say?
The Fractions changes look good. However, was the
The attached patch registeres placeholders to the math toolbar and clarify some
entries.
OK for branch?
regards Uwe
p.s. lyx.org is currently dead
Index: stdtoolbars.inc
===
--- stdtoolbars.inc (revision 21421)
+++ stdtoolbars.inc
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:33:59PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> The attached patch registeres placeholders to the math toolbar and clarify
> some entries.
> OK for branch?
>
> regards Uwe
>
> p.s. lyx.org is currently dead
In deep coma. But I did get a commit through...
- Martin
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> The attached patch registeres placeholders to the math toolbar and clarify
> some entries. OK for branch?
As I'm no math user, I do not have strong opinions. I guess \phantom is
useful. Is it also often used? What do others say?
The Fractions changes look good. However, was
42 matches
Mail list logo