Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-21 Thread John Weiss
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 07:42:22PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Thanks for the explanation. The defskip feature might be useful, but > only with a better GUI-implementation. The user isn't informed where he > can adjust the value and it is unintuitive that he has to it in > completely differend

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-16 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Michael Schmitt wrote: There is really no defskip. I have the choice between Small-, Med-, Bigskip, and Length. Right. And whatever you choose in the document setting dialog becomes "defskip". I.e. either smallskip, medskip or bigskip becomes the default skip for the entire document. Thanks for

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-15 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 15. Januar 2005 11:20 schrieb Andre Poenitz: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 09:33:27PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > > Probably because Michael wanted that the default should be changed from 3 > > to 5. Do others agree? Then I'll commit that. > > Fine with me. Here comes the patch that is g

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-15 Thread Michael Schmitt
Have a look at Layout > Document > (Document Setting) > Layout > Separation > Skip in LyX 1.3.X There is really no defskip. I'm using Ruurds LyXWin 1.3.5-nc. I have the choice between Small-, Med-, Bigskip, and Length. Right. And whatever you choose in the document setting dialog becomes "defsk

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Michael Schmitt wrote: The dialog Layout/Documents also don't have a defskip for paragraph separation. Have a look at Layout > Document > (Document Setting) > Layout > Separation > Skip in LyX 1.3.X There is really no defskip. I'm using Ruurds LyXWin 1.3.5-nc. I have the choice between Small-, M

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 09:33:27PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 11. Januar 2005 23:51 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > I don't understand. Why a patch? LyX has just this feature and I > > described it in the docs now. (a very simple diff is attached) > > Probably because Michael wanted that the

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-15 Thread Michael Schmitt
Unfortunately only xforms users can do that from the GUI, qt users need to edit the .lyx file by hand :-( Then the QT-Frontend shouldn't offer defskips. Qt offers it. Please see my previous email. IMHO the feature is reasonable the way it is implemented. If you would like LyX to behave differentl

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-15 Thread Michael Schmitt
The skip named "defskip" available in the menu Layout->Paragraph inserts a \medskip internally. So why is it listed separately? Because "defskip" is short for "default skip", i.e. the default skip for the given document (see menu Layout/Documents) This notation doesn't appear in the docs and I can'

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Am Dienstag, 11. Januar 2005 23:51 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: >> I don't understand. Why a patch? LyX has just this feature and I >> described it in the docs now. (a very simple diff is attached) Georg> Probably because Michael wanted that th

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-13 Thread Georg Baum
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I get no pdf output, also not in the temp directory (only the .ps-file > is correctly created in the temp dir). But I discovered it now. I get: That means the menu is ok, but your pdf converter does not work. > This is dvips(k) 5.94b Copyright 2004 Radical Eye Software > (www.

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Georg Baum wrote: It should be "ps2pdf". Thanks for this info. I asked because this menu is broken in LyXWin 1.3.5. I ran LyX in debug mode but couldn't find out what happens. What is broken in that menu? I get no pdf output, also not in the temp directory (only the .ps-file is correctly created

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-12 Thread Georg Baum
Am Dienstag, 11. Januar 2005 23:51 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > I don't understand. Why a patch? LyX has just this feature and I > described it in the docs now. (a very simple diff is attached) Probably because Michael wanted that the default should be changed from 3 to 5. Do others agree? Then I'll com

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-11 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Michael Schmitt wrote: >>> I vote for 5 possible bookmarks instead of the current available 3. >>> Because this options is very useful when working in different >>> sections in multiple documents. > I found out now that this is possible when I change the user interface file. Is it really that simp

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-11 Thread Michael Schmitt
Hi Uwe, I vote for 5 possible bookmarks instead of the current available 3. Because this options is very useful when working in different sections in multiple documents. I found out now that this is possible when I change the user interface file. Is it really that simple? In that case, you shoul

Re: [rework docs] more questions

2005-01-11 Thread Uwe Stöhr
I wrote: Navigate menu: I vote for 5 possible bookmarks instead of the current available 3. Because this options is very useful when working in different sections in multiple documents. I found out now that this is possible when I change the user interface file. But now the questions: The print f