Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Timm Danker wrote:
>
> > As a rather unexperienced programmer, I cannot stress enough that it may
> > be worth the effort to avaoid those pimples where possible. For people
> > like me, it would keep the code a lot more easy to understand. I also
> > h
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
Just for the record I made a slight error in my suggestion.
> Nice idiom, wrong application. Even if someone eventually finds the need
> for variables in the GUIRuntime class then you could use a Pimpl specific
> to the toolkits. Either way we don't need f
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > What you would have at best (with the current implementation rewritten):
| > frontend/GUIRuntime.h
| > frontend/*/GUIRuntime.C
|
| You're probably right! Lars should I change that?
Yes, I can... even if I didn't introduce the pimpl.
>
> What you would have at best (with the current implementation rewritten):
> frontend/GUIRuntime.h
> frontend/*/GUIRuntime.C
You're probably right! Lars should I change that?
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna
LyX seems to have developed acne. There are pimples everywhere now.
I think there is at least one we can squeeze out: the GUIRuntime pimple.
I can't see that it serves any useful purpose to have an extra class here
(other than helping extend compile times by a second or so). Why not just
share
