On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:12:05PM +, José Matos wrote:
On Saturday 23 December 2006 1:45 pm, Michael Gerz wrote:
Jose, all,
Hi Michael,
...
Anyway, I wish you all happy holidays (*)
Michael
(*) Yesterday, they mentioned on German television that it is no longer
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Martin Vermeer wrote:
(*) Yesterday, they mentioned on German television that it is no
longer politically correct to say Merry Christmas
And what about Happy New Year, or will that offend people that are
depressed. ;-)
That if anything is an implicit christianism. Or
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:12:05PM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Saturday 23 December 2006 1:45 pm, Michael Gerz wrote:
> > Jose, all,
>
> Hi Michael,
...
> > Anyway, I wish you all happy holidays (*)
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > (*) Yesterday, they mentioned on German television that it is no
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Martin Vermeer wrote:
(*) Yesterday, they mentioned on German television that it is no
longer politically correct to say "Merry Christmas"
And what about "Happy New Year", or will that offend people that are
depressed. ;-)
That if anything is an implicit
On Saturday 23 December 2006 1:45 pm, Michael Gerz wrote:
Jose, all,
Hi Michael,
one week of vacation and I didn't manage to write a single line of code :-(
I can say the same thing. And don't if I should frown or smile. ;-)
As said before, change tracking works in general but
On Saturday 23 December 2006 1:45 pm, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Jose, all,
Hi Michael,
> one week of vacation and I didn't manage to write a single line of code :-(
I can say the same thing. And don't if I should frown or smile. ;-)
> As said before, change tracking works in general but
Jose, all,
one week of vacation and I didn't manage to write a single line of code :-(
As said before, change tracking works in general but accept/reject
change are still seriously broken. If possible, I will work on both
functions next week.
Given the fact that there are still some real
Jose, all,
one week of vacation and I didn't manage to write a single line of code :-(
As said before, change tracking works in general but "accept/reject
change" are still seriously broken. If possible, I will work on both
functions next week.
Given the fact that there are still some real
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 10:48:24PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
Torino (Turin) is a fine place, and I should tell you that they
were supporting the french team yesterday. :-)
Andre Supporting a French team in Torino?
Andre Looks like I lost
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 10:48:24PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
>> Torino (Turin) is a fine place, and I should tell you that they
>> were supporting the french team yesterday. :-)
Andre> Supporting a French team in Torino?
Andre>
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 10:48:24PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
Torino (Turin) is a fine place, and I should tell you that they were
supporting the french team yesterday. :-)
Supporting a French team in Torino?
Looks like I lost track of the village wars in Southern Europe.
The only thing
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 10:48:24PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> Torino (Turin) is a fine place, and I should tell you that they were
> supporting the french team yesterday. :-)
Supporting a French team in Torino?
Looks like I lost track of the village wars in Southern Europe.
> The only
Michael Gerz wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I think we all are frustrated.
Then we have at least one thing in common.
Or maybe two: I WANT TO HAVE ABDEL BACK IN THIS PROJECTS.
No need to shout Michael :-)
Abdel, pleease!
I might very well succumb to this love declaration, care
Eventually, I guess we'll work out the management difficulties we have
(had?).
Welcome back! Your Friday humor triggered another round of discussion
and now xform is eventually being removed. Now, you need to split your
patch and get to work. :-)
Bo
On Sunday 02 July 2006 21:57, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Or maybe two: I WANT TO HAVE ABDEL BACK IN THIS PROJECTS.
No need to shout Michael :-)
I leave you (all) alone for 4 days and is this what you do? ;-)
Torino (Turin) is a fine place, and I should tell you that they were
supporting
Michael Gerz wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I think we all are frustrated.
Then we have at least one thing in common.
Or maybe two: I WANT TO HAVE ABDEL BACK IN THIS PROJECTS.
No need to shout Michael :-)
Abdel, pleease!
I might very well succumb to this love declaration, care
Eventually, I guess we'll work out the management difficulties we have
(had?).
Welcome back! Your Friday humor triggered another round of discussion
and now xform is eventually being removed. Now, you need to split your
patch and get to work. :-)
Bo
On Sunday 02 July 2006 21:57, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Or maybe two: I WANT TO HAVE ABDEL BACK IN THIS PROJECTS.
>
> No need to shout Michael :-)
I leave you (all) alone for 4 days and is this what you do? ;-)
Torino (Turin) is a fine place, and I should tell you that they were
Bo Peng wrote:
We do. Developers should be treat as ... developers, and have some
freedom of deciding things in their own domains. I mean, let Enrico
handle cygwin, let Abdel takes charge of qt4, and if there are
disputes, their votes should count as important as Lars.
We have to establish a
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I think we all are frustrated.
Then we have at least one thing in common.
Or maybe two: I WANT TO HAVE ABDEL BACK IN THIS PROJECTS.
Abdel, pleease!
Michael
Bo Peng wrote:
We do. Developers should be treat as ... developers, and have some
freedom of deciding things in their own domains. I mean, let Enrico
handle cygwin, let Abdel takes charge of qt4, and if there are
disputes, their votes should count as important as Lars.
We have to establish a
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I think we all are frustrated.
Then we have at least one thing in common.
Or maybe two: I WANT TO HAVE ABDEL BACK IN THIS PROJECTS.
Abdel, pleease!
Michael
Michael Gerz wrote:
Hello,
Abdel's retirement really makes me feel sad. I said this a couple of
times before: We have a project management problem! And we lost focus.
4 frontends, 3 build systems,
and 0.5 developers...
... unbelievable!
It seems that I have to make a break for some time.
Abdel's retirement really makes me feel sad.
Me too. Abdel has helped me fight the scons war, and was on my side
for many such situations. If this is not only a Friday vent of anger,
I may have to retire as well.
I said this a couple of times before: We have a project management problem!
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Abdel's retirement really makes me feel sad.
|
| Me too. Abdel has helped me fight the scons war, and was on my side
| for many such situations. If this is not only a Friday vent of anger,
| I may have to retire as well.
Which would be a real pitty.
I have
We have four frontends because Lars simply loves his xform frontend,
Oh... we are down to that level now...
Not exactly. But today is Friday so a little exaggeration is allowed.
You are of course aware that xforms is broken in the tree right now
because I did not push to have it properly
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| So you mean we can ignore xform and gtk when implementing new
| features? If the value of trunk/xform is only for speed benchmarking,
| we can remove/ignore it totally and use 1.4.x. xform.
*doh* ... I wish some one had made that statement a bit earlier... I
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| and 0.5 developers...
Oh... we are down to that level now...
i agree 0.5 is not a lot (and, as bo pointed out, it's friday)
...
as you write, there is frustration on many sides.
this needs to be sorted out one way or the other.
putting one's heels in the sand
Michael Gerz wrote:
Hello,
Abdel's retirement really makes me feel sad. I said this a couple of
times before: We have a project management problem! And we lost focus.
> 4 frontends, 3 build systems,
and 0.5 developers...
... unbelievable!
It seems that I have to make a break for some
> Abdel's retirement really makes me feel sad.
Me too. Abdel has helped me fight the scons war, and was on my side
for many such situations. If this is not only a Friday vent of anger,
I may have to retire as well.
I said this a couple of times before: We have a project management problem!
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > > Abdel's retirement really makes me feel sad.
|
| Me too. Abdel has helped me fight the scons war, and was on my side
| for many such situations. If this is not only a Friday vent of anger,
| I may have to retire as well.
Which would be a real pitty.
We have four frontends because Lars simply loves his xform frontend,
Oh... we are down to that level now...
Not exactly. But today is Friday so a little exaggeration is allowed.
You are of course aware that xforms is broken in the tree right now
because I did not push to have it properly
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So you mean we can ignore xform and gtk when implementing new
| features? If the value of trunk/xform is only for speed benchmarking,
| we can remove/ignore it totally and use 1.4.x. xform.
*doh* ... I wish some one had made that statement a bit earlier...
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > and 0.5 developers...
Oh... we are down to that level now...
i agree 0.5 is not a lot (and, as bo pointed out, it's friday)
...
as you write, there is frustration on many sides.
this needs to be sorted out one way or the other.
putting one's heels in the
34 matches
Mail list logo
