>
>
> Vincent, if it is so important for you to not get big emails, then you
> really have to solve that at your side. Sorting into folders, forwarding
> only small mails, only getting headers etc. You cannot really expect
> people/mailes/svnmailer what ever to solve that for you.
>
No, but one ha
Le 27/05/2011 10:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
But I can agree that the mails from mailer.py is a bit on the large side
at some times.
Yes, we need something better than mailer.py, but it does not seem
trivial enough to me.
JMarc
Vincent van Ravesteijn writes:
| On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
| wrote:
>
>> Le 28/03/11 19:31, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
>>
>> I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082).
>>>
>>> I know there are more important things to think about, however, jus
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 28/03/11 19:31, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
>
> I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082).
>>
>> I know there are more important things to think about, however, just to
>> not
>> forget about this . . . .
>>
Le 17/04/11 23:39, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
This is done now. (easier than pmwiki!)
good news, thanks
For pmwiki I am not even able to understand how the current booki3Ai
password is set. Grep does not turn it up, either in plain text, not in
crypt()ed version. I am not sure what Christian did
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 02/04/11 16:32, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> btw could we get updated doxygen documentation on the server?
>> pavel
>
> This is done now. (easier than pmwiki!)
good news, thanks
pavel
Le 02/04/11 16:32, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
btw could we get updated doxygen documentation on the server?
pavel
This is done now. (easier than pmwiki!)
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> "apt-get install svnmailer" is rather intimidating. Why would I let it
> install subversion??
my advice was for the case svnmailer is already there and configured.
i wouldn't risk to break svn server by udpating ;)
btw could we get updated doxygen documentation on t
Le 28/03/11 23:30, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 28/03/11 19:31, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082).
I know there are more important things to think about, however, just to
not
forget about this . . . .
I actua
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 28/03/11 19:31, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
>> I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082).
>>
>> I know there are more important things to think about, however, just to
>> not
>> forget about this . . . .
>
> I actually looked at it a few day
Le 28/03/11 19:31, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082).
I know there are more important things to think about, however, just to not
forget about this . . . .
I actually looked at it a few days ago. It turns out that our mails are
creat
Il 17/02/2011 01:26, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
If it is not too difficult, I would propose to cut the attached patches to
a maximum size,
+1
JMarc, this should be just one option in the svn hook scripts.
I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082)
Il 17/02/2011 01:22, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto:
I'd like to know whether anyone else (apart from myself) has some
troubles with those so long refactoring/new-features patches entirely
sent to the lyx-cvs e-mail box.
just to support the argument: the dictionary e-mail of yesterday was a
8MB
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> If it is not too difficult, I would propose to cut the attached patches to
> a maximum size,
+1
JMarc, this should be just one option in the svn hook scripts.
pavel
Hi all,
I'd like to know whether anyone else (apart from myself) has some
troubles with those so long refactoring/new-features patches entirely
sent to the lyx-cvs e-mail box.
I'm sure I'm using a so bad e-mail client like Thunderbird, however when
opening one of those e-mail messages, my Th
15 matches
Mail list logo
