Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:44:36PM +0200, ben wrote: [...] Have you been able to recompile using Angus tip's? Yes it works fine. My problem now is that there are troubles with the layouts. First, a general question: it seems that the raw style (that used to be LaTeX style) for a whole
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:44:36PM +0200, ben wrote: [...] Have you been able to recompile using Angus tip's? Yes it works fine. [...] For Latex that's true. For docbook and for now, I keep SGML. I intend to remove it later. Replaced by
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:44:36PM +0200, ben wrote: [...] > > Have you been able to recompile using Angus tip's? > > Yes it works fine. My problem now is that there are troubles with the layouts. > First, a general question: it seems that the raw style (that used to be LaTeX > style) for a
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:44:36PM +0200, ben wrote: > [...] > > > Have you been able to recompile using Angus tip's? > > > > Yes it works fine. [...] > > For Latex that's true. > For docbook and for now, I keep SGML. I intend to remove it later.
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:37:01AM +0200, ben wrote: I think that we can start integrating the config phase of db2lyx with lyx. [...] Ok. I hope it's not too hard to do that. Not too hard. But boring sometimes. :-) I understand.
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:37:01AM +0200, ben wrote: > > > > > I think that we can start integrating the config phase of db2lyx with lyx. > > > > > > [...] > > Ok. I hope it's not too hard to do that. > > Not too hard. But boring sometimes. :-) I
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:37:17AM +0200, ben wrote: Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:07AM +0200, ben wrote: [...] Personaly I prefer solution 2. What do you think? Have you seen other solutions? I prefer 2) also. And as far as I know there isn't
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:37:01AM +0200, ben wrote: I think that we can start integrating the config phase of db2lyx with lyx. Also one of my goals, the same that motivated my work with relyx previously, is to be able to run db2lyx from the source directory. Although I
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:37:17AM +0200, ben wrote: > Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:07AM +0200, ben wrote: > > [...] > > > Personaly I prefer solution 2. What do you think? Have you seen other solutions? > > > > I prefer 2) also. And as far as I know
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:37:01AM +0200, ben wrote: > > > I think that we can start integrating the config phase of db2lyx with lyx. > > > > Also one of my goals, the same that motivated my work with relyx > > previously, is to be able to run db2lyx from the source directory. > > Although
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:07AM +0200, ben wrote: [...] Personaly I prefer solution 2. What do you think? Have you seen other solutions? I prefer 2) also. And as far as I know there isn't a cleanner way to do it. BG -- José
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:32AM +0200, ben wrote: [...] I have problems with docbook-xml 4.1, but not with 4.1.2. What are the problems? Something like: make[1]: Entering directory /home/jamatos/lyx/db2lyx-0.1.4/doc/outlyx' xsltproc manual-lyx.xsl ../src/manual.xml manual.out.lyx
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:32AM +0200, ben wrote: [...] I have problems with docbook-xml 4.1, but not with 4.1.2. What are the problems? Something like: [...] I guess that is the reason why the version 4.1.2 was released. I remember
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:07AM +0200, ben wrote: [...] Personaly I prefer solution 2. What do you think? Have you seen other solutions? I prefer 2) also. And as far as I know there isn't a cleanner way to do it. Yep. Here is the patch for
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:07AM +0200, ben wrote: [...] > Personaly I prefer solution 2. What do you think? Have you seen other solutions? I prefer 2) also. And as far as I know there isn't a cleanner way to do it. > BG -- José
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:32AM +0200, ben wrote: [...] > > I have problems with docbook-xml 4.1, but not with 4.1.2. > > What are the problems? Something like: make[1]: Entering directory /home/jamatos/lyx/db2lyx-0.1.4/doc/outlyx' xsltproc manual-lyx.xsl ../src/manual.xml >
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:32AM +0200, ben wrote: > [...] > > > I have problems with docbook-xml 4.1, but not with 4.1.2. > > > > What are the problems? > > Something like: > > [...] > > I guess that is the reason why the version 4.1.2 was
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:07AM +0200, ben wrote: > [...] > > Personaly I prefer solution 2. What do you think? Have you seen other solutions? > > I prefer 2) also. And as far as I know there isn't a cleanner way to do it. Yep. Here is the patch for
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:31:46PM +0200, ben wrote: No, it should work since xsltproc (well, libxml2) understands both SGML and XML catalog syntax. In my local config it works. I think the problem is that the public IDs expected by db2lyx are not defined (or not well defined) in one of the
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:31:46PM +0200, ben wrote: Hi Ben, after correcting the path in refentry.dtd I have succefully run the makefile in doc/. I have problems with docbook-xml 4.1, but not with 4.1.2. -- José
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:31:46PM +0200, ben wrote: Ok, after many dangers I have set all the needed files. I have run xml_config in ~/.lyx. I admit that config is a bit heavy... No problem until... make[2]: Entering directory
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:31:46PM +0200, ben wrote: Hi Ben, after correcting the path in refentry.dtd I have succefully run the makefile in doc/. I have problems with docbook-xml 4.1, but not with 4.1.2. What are the problems? BG
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:31:46PM +0200, ben wrote: > No, it should work since xsltproc (well, libxml2) understands both SGML and XML > catalog syntax. In my local config it works. I think the problem is that the > public IDs expected by db2lyx are not defined (or not well defined) in one of >
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:31:46PM +0200, ben wrote: Hi Ben, after correcting the path in refentry.dtd I have succefully run the makefile in doc/. I have problems with docbook-xml 4.1, but not with 4.1.2. -- José
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:31:46PM +0200, ben wrote: > > Ok, after many dangers I have set all the needed files. I have run > xml_config in ~/.lyx. I admit that config is a bit heavy... > No problem until... > > make[2]: Entering directory
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:31:46PM +0200, ben wrote: > > Hi Ben, > after correcting the path in refentry.dtd I have succefully run the > makefile in doc/. > > I have problems with docbook-xml 4.1, but not with 4.1.2. What are the problems? BG
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : One problem. The content of my catalog file is: -- AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED, DO NOT EDIT -- CATALOG /usr/share/sgml/entities/iso-entities-8879.1986/iso-entities.cat CATALOG /usr/share/sgml/dtd/docbook/3.1/docbook.cat CATALOG
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > One problem. > > The content of my catalog file is: > > -- AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED, DO NOT EDIT -- > CATALOG "/usr/share/sgml/entities/iso-entities-8879.1986/iso-entities.cat" > CATALOG "/usr/share/sgml/dtd/docbook/3.1/docbook.cat" > CATALOG
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:06:44PM +0200, ben wrote: Here is a minor release, that fixes the following points: * Possibility to select the XSLT used by the Makefiles. XT, Xalan and xsltproc are supported. By default xsltproc is used. Good. * Some XSL changes so that xsltproc works
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
One problem. The content of my catalog file is: -- AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED, DO NOT EDIT -- CATALOG /usr/share/sgml/entities/iso-entities-8879.1986/iso-entities.cat CATALOG /usr/share/sgml/dtd/docbook/3.1/docbook.cat CATALOG /usr/share/sgml/stylesheets/docbook/catalog CATALOG
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:06:44PM +0200, ben wrote: > Here is a minor release, that fixes the following points: > > * Possibility to select the XSLT used by the Makefiles. XT, Xalan and xsltproc are > supported. By default xsltproc is used. Good. > * Some XSL changes so that xsltproc
Re: DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
One problem. The content of my catalog file is: -- AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED, DO NOT EDIT -- CATALOG "/usr/share/sgml/entities/iso-entities-8879.1986/iso-entities.cat" CATALOG "/usr/share/sgml/dtd/docbook/3.1/docbook.cat" CATALOG "/usr/share/sgml/stylesheets/docbook/catalog" CATALOG
DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Here is a minor release, that fixes the following points: * Possibility to select the XSLT used by the Makefiles. XT, Xalan and xsltproc are supported. By default xsltproc is used. * Some XSL changes so that xsltproc works fine. * The LyX manual file is changed so that HTML chunking produces
DB2LyX release (0.1.4)
Here is a minor release, that fixes the following points: * Possibility to select the XSLT used by the Makefiles. XT, Xalan and xsltproc are supported. By default xsltproc is used. * Some XSL changes so that xsltproc works fine. * The LyX manual file is changed so that HTML chunking produces
