Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Marko Vendelin wrote:
|
| >
| >
| > On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
| >
| > > Actually, I've been trying to figure out how to fit everything into the
| > > tabbed area without requiring a dialog that is 2048pixels wide. I'm
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Allan Rae wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > > However, I think the preferences dialog has more serious
> > > problems:
> > > When the last visible tab is only partially visible,
> > > clicking on it will always cause a SIGSEV. For ex
> "R" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> What was the reason for choosing Xforms as the GUI interface? It
R> causes lots of pain and inconvenience (menu behaviour for example).
At the time, the choice was between Motif and xforms. The choice was
easy...
JMarc
Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > However, I think the preferences dialog has more serious
> > problems:
> > When the last visible tab is only partially visible,
> > clicking on it will always cause a SIGSEV. For example,
> > resize the window so that you see "Pa" ins
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Marko Vendelin wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Actually, I've been trying to figure out how to fit everything into the
> > tabbed area without requiring a dialog that is 2048pixels wide. I'm very,
> > very slowly getting there. At present it loo
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Actually, I've been trying to figure out how to fit everything into the
> tabbed area without requiring a dialog that is 2048pixels wide. I'm very,
> very slowly getting there. At present it looks like I'll switch to a
> nested tabbed dialog scheme and
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> "Garst R. Reese" wrote:
> > The Opions->Preferences dialog is too narrow on 800x600.
> > The tab that is labeled Pri??? is cutoff. Clicking on the part remaining
> > causes a
> > SIGSEV.
> > Garst
>
> Indeed, it would be better if the default width include
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
> The Opions->Preferences dialog is too narrow on 800x600.
> The tab that is labeled Pri??? is cutoff. Clicking on the part remaining
> causes a
> SIGSEV.
> Garst
Indeed, it would be better if the default width includes the
second half of the "Printer" tab and the "Path" t
Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just downloaded the latest CVS and I noticed
> > that many dialogs have a limited "resizeability".
> > I wonder wether that is on purpose, or that this
> > is a "under-construction" feature.
>
> On purpose.
>
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just downloaded the latest CVS and I noticed
> that many dialogs have a limited "resizeability".
> I wonder wether that is on purpose, or that this
> is a "under-construction" feature.
On purpose.
> For example the Citation, Reference, U
Hi,
I've just downloaded the latest CVS and I noticed
that many dialogs have a limited "resizeability".
I wonder wether that is on purpose, or that this
is a "under-construction" feature.
For example the Citation, Reference, Url etc. dialogs
can only be resized in X direction. Others are even
t
11 matches
Mail list logo
