Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:28:43AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> | > Now that it works and there is some outside interest, I'd be very
> | > happy to see it go.
> |
> | Hm, there is std::list<> for starters...
>
> Hmm.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:46:56AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Hm, there is std::list<> for starters...
>
> Hmm... yes... but is this written in C++?
Hard to tell, haven't found the sources yet...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:28:43AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
| > Now that it works and there is some outside interest, I'd be very
| > happy to see it go.
|
| Hm, there is std::list<> for starters...
Hmm... yes... but is this written in C++?
--
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:28:43AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Now that it works and there is some outside interest, I'd be very
> happy to see it go.
Hm, there is std::list<> for starters...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they d
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:12:50AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
>> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> > What is glib?
>> >
>> part of gnome -- short for gnome-lib I guess. Dumb name.
>
> Why is there such a dependency for a spell-checker library?
>From the web page:
Encha
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:12:50AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > What is glib?
> >
> part of gnome -- short for gnome-lib I guess. Dumb name.
Why is there such a dependency for a spell-checker library?
[It is my understanding that even KDE based Linux distros
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> What is glib?
>
part of gnome -- short for gnome-lib I guess. Dumb name.
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| http://www.abisource.com/enchant/
|
| I've been talking with Dom, and it sounds like this might be promising
| for LyX. One problem is that it only takes UTF8 apparently though (and
| currently there is a requirement on glib - I'm not sure whether that
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 05:03:35PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> For the record, Enchant is already in use by Conglomerate, Lyx, and AbiWord.
I got him to fix it already.
The big issue for us is UTF8
regards
john
John Levon wrote:
>
> http://www.abisource.com/enchant/
>
> I've been talking with Dom, and it sounds like this might be promising
> for LyX. One problem is that it only takes UTF8 apparently though (and
> currently there is a requirement on glib - I'm not sure whether that's a
> serious proble
On Thursday 17 July 2003 16:42, John Levon wrote:
> http://www.abisource.com/enchant/
>
> I've been talking with Dom, and it sounds like this might be promising
> for LyX. One problem is that it only takes UTF8 apparently though (and
> currently there is a requirement on glib - I'm not sure whether
http://www.abisource.com/enchant/
I've been talking with Dom, and it sounds like this might be promising
for LyX. One problem is that it only takes UTF8 apparently though (and
currently there is a requirement on glib - I'm not sure whether that's a
serious problem)
regards
john
12 matches
Mail list logo
