Re: Footnotes in tables

2006-09-20 Thread Alex
Dear Georg, Maybe this example file would be included into the distribution? It would be better IMHO to fix this bug: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=808 Maybe it would, but as far I see this is not a LyX bug, but instead a LaTeX one. This can be a workaround useable behind the

Re: Footnotes in tables

2006-09-20 Thread Alex
Dear Georg, >> Maybe this example file would be included into the distribution? > > It would be better IMHO to fix this bug: > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=808 Maybe it would, but as far I see this is not a LyX bug, but instead a LaTeX one. This can be a workaround useable behind

Footnotes in tables.

2000-10-18 Thread Allan Rae
Try it and see what it looks like. Allan. (ARRae)

RE: Footnotes in tables.

2000-10-18 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 18-Oct-2000 Allan Rae wrote: Try it and see what it looks like. What footnotes to you mean, old-style or new foot insets? Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Italienallee 13/N

Re: Footnotes in tables.

2000-10-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Allan" == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan Try it and see what it looks like. I guess that's not a surprise since footnotes in tables should use NEW_INSETS to work well. I guess this should be just disabled. JMarc

Re: Footnotes in tables.

2000-10-18 Thread Allan Rae
On 18 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Allan" == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan Try it and see what it looks like. I guess that's not a surprise since footnotes in tables should use NEW_INSETS to work well. I guess this should be just disabled. No! Then I'd

Re: Footnotes in tables.

2000-10-18 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 18-Oct-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Allan Try it and see what it looks like. I guess that's not a surprise since footnotes in tables should use NEW_INSETS to work well. I guess this should be just disabled. I guess too, as I'm not working on death code (but if someone else wants

Footnotes in tables.

2000-10-18 Thread Allan Rae
Try it and see what it looks like. Allan. (ARRae)

RE: Footnotes in tables.

2000-10-18 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 18-Oct-2000 Allan Rae wrote: > > Try it and see what it looks like. What footnotes to you mean, old-style or new foot insets? Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Italienallee 13/N

Re: Footnotes in tables.

2000-10-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> Try it and see what it looks like. I guess that's not a surprise since footnotes in tables should use NEW_INSETS to work well. I guess this should be just disabled. JMarc

Re: Footnotes in tables.

2000-10-18 Thread Allan Rae
On 18 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Allan> Try it and see what it looks like. > > I guess that's not a surprise since footnotes in tables should use > NEW_INSET

Re: Footnotes in tables.

2000-10-18 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 18-Oct-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Allan> Try it and see what it looks like. > > I guess that's not a surprise since footnotes in tables should use > NEW_INSETS to work well. I guess this should be just disabled. I guess too, as I'm not working on death code (but

Re: Footnotes in Tables?

1999-10-25 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 24-Oct-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ERT only \footnote{...} Well yes, but \footnote{} wouldn't work in a normal table :) On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 02:48:38PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote: ...is this somehow possible? Is it being worked on in the 1.1 devel tree? I couldn't find anything

Re: Footnotes in Tables?

1999-10-25 Thread larry
What about a normal table specified as a minipage? I could have sworn that works here. At any rate, specifying multipage *does* put the footnotes at the bottom of your table, desirable in many circumstances. On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 09:50:15AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: On 24-Oct-99 [EMAIL

Re: Footnotes in Tables?

1999-10-25 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 24-Oct-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ERT only > > \footnote{...} Well yes, but \footnote{} wouldn't work in a normal table :) > > On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 02:48:38PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote: >> >> ...is this somehow possible? Is it being worked on in the 1.1 devel tree? >> I couldn't find

Re: Footnotes in Tables?

1999-10-25 Thread larry
What about a normal table specified as a minipage? I could have sworn that works here. At any rate, specifying multipage *does* put the footnotes at the bottom of your table, desirable in many circumstances. On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 09:50:15AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 24-Oct-99

Re: Footnotes in Tables?

1999-10-24 Thread larry
ERT only \footnote{...} On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 02:48:38PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote: ...is this somehow possible? Is it being worked on in the 1.1 devel tree? I couldn't find anything in the docs. Best wishes, Nils -- -lsm

Re: Footnotes in Tables?

1999-10-24 Thread larry
ERT only \footnote{...} On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 02:48:38PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote: > > ...is this somehow possible? Is it being worked on in the 1.1 devel tree? > I couldn't find anything in the docs. > > > Best wishes, > Nils > > -- -lsm