Re: Further inset configurability

2007-08-21 Thread Helge Hafting
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:22:44 +0200 Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Richard Heck wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:40:27PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: This looks reasonable to me, though I haven't tested it. (I'm st

Re: Further inset configurability

2007-08-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:22:44 +0200 Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > > Martin Vermeer wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:40:27PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > >> > >>> This looks reasonable to me, though I haven't tested it. (I'm still > >>> obsessing over Bi

Re: Further inset configurability

2007-08-21 Thread Helge Hafting
Richard Heck wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:40:27PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: This looks reasonable to me, though I haven't tested it. (I'm still obsessing over BibTeX stuff.) One suggestion: I think CharStyles should by default have an unobtrusive presentatio

Re: Further inset configurability

2007-08-20 Thread Richard Heck
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:40:27PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: This looks reasonable to me, though I haven't tested it. (I'm still obsessing over BibTeX stuff.) One suggestion: I think CharStyles should by default have an unobtrusive presentation, NOT with the labe

Re: Further inset configurability

2007-08-18 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:40:27PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > This looks reasonable to me, though I haven't tested it. (I'm still > obsessing over BibTeX stuff.) > > One suggestion: I think CharStyles should by default have an unobtrusive > presentation, NOT with the label showing. OK

Re: Further inset configurability

2007-08-18 Thread Richard Heck
This looks reasonable to me, though I haven't tested it. (I'm still obsessing over BibTeX stuff.) One suggestion: I think CharStyles should by default have an unobtrusive presentation, NOT with the label showing. The default presentation now (or previously?) gets particularly ugly if you try

Re: Further inset configurability

2007-08-18 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 12:09:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Steady progress, see patch. > > > I tried but failed. > > rh Here is the full, final patch of all parts. - Martin Index: development/FORMAT

Re: Further inset configurability

2007-08-18 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 12:09:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Steady progress, see patch. > > > I tried but failed. > > rh > Ok, let's try again ;-/ ("must have been good-looking cause he's so hard to see") - Martin Index: InsetCharStyle.h ==

Re: Further inset configurability

2007-08-18 Thread Richard Heck
Martin Vermeer wrote: Steady progress, see patch. I tried but failed. rh -- == Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown University http://frege.brown.edu/heck/ ==

Re: Further inset configurability

2007-08-18 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 03:09:30PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Steady progress, see patch. > > This would require a version bump in order to do properly: > getting rid of InsetCharStyle's draw_label and use > Collapsable's status_ for this purpose. > > I'll do this and commit later today if no

Further inset configurability

2007-08-18 Thread Martin Vermeer
Steady progress, see patch. This would require a version bump in order to do properly: getting rid of InsetCharStyle's draw_label and use Collapsable's status_ for this purpose. I'll do this and commit later today if nobody objects (yes, everything still works ;-) - Martin