> which probably does what you want. It may make more sense however to
> have a version that requires a reference directory as argument.
just a question .. does this somehow interfere with the new embeding stuff
in 1.6?
pavel
Vasek Smidl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah, I think it is the latter.
> In changeset/3881 the detection is:
> (IsFileReadable(MakeAbsPath(params().filename, buf->filePath()))
>
> while now it is:
>isFileReadable(params().filename);
>
> So it is checked by a different function, (lowerca
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I came across the situation when some of my older lyx files could no longer
> > compile under new versions of LyX.
Well, the file is about 5 years old, and I haven't tried to compile it since, so
the problem may actually be there quite a long time.
> I came across the situation when some of my older lyx files could no longer
> compile under new versions of LyX.
looking on the commit history this line has been introduced by Herbert
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/3881
and the only interesting change was made by
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ch
Hi all,
I came across the situation when some of my older lyx files could no longer
compile under new versions of LyX. lyx2lyx goes smoothly but pdf generation
fails.
The reason is that I was using graphics files that were visible for latex (via
kpsewhich), but not for LyX. As a results, new ve
