Re: Invitation to google wave

2009-12-23 Thread Peter Kümmel
> To make things more clear, my main interest with Wave in connection with > LyX is that I think there are interesting things in Wave as a concept > which we eventually could incorporate into LyX. (I don't advocate us using > Wave at this time for developer communication, maybe I never will) >

Re: Invitation to google wave

2009-12-10 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote: To make things more clear, my main interest with Wave in connection with LyX is that I think there are interesting things in Wave as a concept which we eventually could incorporate into LyX. (I don't advocate us using Wave at this time for developer commu

Re: Invitation to google wave

2009-12-08 Thread Christian Ridderström
>> Now, if this had been a wave conversation, I could just have edited my >> initial text, making it clear what I meant. Which would mean that >> other readers of the thread wouldn't have to be confused. > > Rewriting history is much less funny than just misunderstanding each others > IMO. I'm sur

Re: Invitation to google wave

2009-12-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 8 déc. 09 à 22:50, Christian Ridderström a écrit : It's funny, but the above is an example of where a wave conversation would have been better than e-mail. I wrote '... why I passed on invitations', which is unfortunately unclear and a poor choice of words. I meant to say that I "passed out in

Re: Invitation to google wave

2009-12-08 Thread Christian Ridderström
2009/12/8 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 8 déc. 09 à 21:10, Christian Ridderström a écrit : >> >> (my apologies for posting part of your reply to the list, but I think >> it might good if I explain in general why I passed on invitations) > > I think passing the invitation was a good idea. Personally,

Re: Invitation to google wave

2009-12-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 8 déc. 09 à 21:10, Christian Ridderström a écrit : (my apologies for posting part of your reply to the list, but I think it might good if I explain in general why I passed on invitations) I think passing the invitation was a good idea. Personally, I am running out of time for experiments...

Re: Invitation to google wave

2009-12-08 Thread Pavel Sanda
Christian Ridderström wrote: > feeling for how easy, or difficult, it is to work on one document when > there are multiple cursors moving around on the screen. In my opinion i think that all people around agree that having this in lyx would be fine, we dont need google wave to tell us - this idea

Re: Invitation to google wave

2009-12-08 Thread Christian Ridderström
Hi Uwe, (my apologies for posting part of your reply to the list, but I think it might good if I explain in general why I passed on invitations) >> Use it or not as you please. My main motivation for giving you the >> invite is that the collaborative aspects with using google wave is >> something