Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 29/04/2014 19:29, Scott Kostyshak: We do not parse looking for R commands in Systemcall::startscript as we were doing for Python. The second patch should not change any functionality, just organization (I will

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 29/04/2014 19:29, Scott Kostyshak: > >> We do not parse looking for R commands in Systemcall::startscript as >> we were doing for Python. The second patch should not change any >> functionality, just organization

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

29/04/2014 19:29, Scott Kostyshak: We do not parse looking for R commands in Systemcall::startscript as we were doing for Python. The second patch should not change any functionality, just organization (I will state this explicitly in the commit message). Just in case, I tested exporting the

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

29/04/2014 19:29, Scott Kostyshak: We do not parse looking for R commands in Systemcall::startscript as we were doing for Python. The second patch should not change any functionality, just organization (I will state this explicitly in the commit message). Just in case, I tested exporting the

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 28/04/2014 01:57, Scott Kostyshak: I am not sure that I understand the second patch: what are the changes in commandPrep wrt libScritpSearch exactly? How come that you did not need to change the documentation of

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 28/04/2014 01:57, Scott Kostyshak: > > I am not sure that I understand the second patch: what are the changes in > commandPrep wrt libScritpSearch exactly? How come that you did not need to > change the

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

28/04/2014 01:57, Scott Kostyshak: Any other comments? If not I will commit the two patches to master that are attached (they are the same as before except that I revert the temporary fix at 731b8610 in one of them now). I am not sure that I understand the second patch: what are the changes

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

28/04/2014 01:57, Scott Kostyshak: Any other comments? If not I will commit the two patches to master that are attached (they are the same as before except that I revert the temporary fix at 731b8610 in one of them now). I am not sure that I understand the second patch: what are the changes

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 31/01/2014 07:02, Scott Kostyshak: In any case, this is probably not usable to 2.1 (maybe backported later). I understand this was the

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> 31/01/2014 07:02, Scott Kostyshak: > >> In any case, this is probably not usable to 2.1 (maybe backported later). I >> understand

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 31/01/2014 07:02, Scott Kostyshak: In any case, this is probably not usable to 2.1 (maybe backported later). I understand this was the precise reason why you wanted to do that. In this case, a solution maybe to, in

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 31/01/2014 07:02, Scott Kostyshak: > In any case, this is probably not usable to 2.1 (maybe backported later). I > understand this was the precise reason why you wanted to do that. In this > case, a solution maybe

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

31/01/2014 07:02, Scott Kostyshak: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: Ah, right. OK then, I will make a patch for using libScriptSearch in SystemCall::startscript(). Attached is a patch. Note that I also made the change in ForkedCall::startScript. I'm not

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 31/01/2014 07:02, Scott Kostyshak: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: Ah, right. OK then, I will make a patch for using libScriptSearch in SystemCall::startscript().

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

31/01/2014 07:02, Scott Kostyshak: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Ah, right. OK then, I will make a patch for using libScriptSearch in SystemCall::startscript(). Attached is a patch. Note that I also made the change in ForkedCall::startScript. I'm

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 31/01/2014 07:02, Scott Kostyshak: >> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> >>> Ah, right. OK then, I will make a patch for using libScriptSearch in >>>

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 29/01/14 06:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Makes sense. I was a little worried about performance from libScriptSearch but I guess it is

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> Le 29/01/14 06:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> >>> Makes sense. I was a little worried about performance from >>> libScriptSearch but

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

Le 29/01/14 06:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Makes sense. I was a little worried about performance from libScriptSearch but I guess it is not an issue compared to the overhead of running an external command anyway. What about the substitutions of the other converter variables? Should they also

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 29/01/14 06:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Makes sense. I was a little worried about performance from libScriptSearch but I guess it is not an issue compared to the overhead of running an external command

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

Le 29/01/14 06:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Makes sense. I was a little worried about performance from libScriptSearch but I guess it is not an issue compared to the overhead of running an external command anyway. What about the substitutions of the other converter variables? Should they also

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 29/01/14 06:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> Makes sense. I was a little worried about performance from >> libScriptSearch but I guess it is not an issue compared to the >> overhead of running an external

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

Le 25/01/14 19:18, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : If latex=pdflatex is specified, the $$s is not substituted. The only substitution is for $$i. This is not documented. I have a script that I want to use to run pdflatex (and do other things like copy the log file to a different directory). Because my

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

Le 27/01/14 19:07, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Is there any reason not to make any of the other substitutions also? I would like to either fix this for 2.1 or fix the Customization manual. I think there is no reason for not doing it, but in this case it should be done with a centralized method

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 27/01/14 19:07, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Is there any reason not to make any of the other substitutions also? I would like to either fix this for 2.1 or fix the Customization manual. I think there is no

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 25/01/14 19:18, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : If latex=pdflatex is specified, the $$s is not substituted. The only substitution is for $$i. This is not documented. I have a script that I want to use to run pdflatex

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

Le 25/01/14 19:18, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : If latex=pdflatex is specified, the $$s is not substituted. The only substitution is for $$i. This is not documented. I have a script that I want to use to run pdflatex (and do other things like copy the log file to a different directory). Because my

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

Le 27/01/14 19:07, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Is there any reason not to make any of the other substitutions also? I would like to either fix this for 2.1 or fix the Customization manual. I think there is no reason for not doing it, but in this case it should be done with a centralized method

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 27/01/14 19:07, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> Is there any reason not to make any of the other substitutions also? I >> would like to either fix this for 2.1 or fix the Customization manual. > > > I think there

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 25/01/14 19:18, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> If latex=pdflatex is specified, the $$s is not substituted. The only >> substitution is for $$i. This is not documented. I have a script that >> I want to use to

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 23/01/2014 17:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : $$s is for the

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >> wrote: >>> Le 23/01/2014 17:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>>

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 23/01/2014 17:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : $$s is for the system directory. So to reach those scripts one could do $$s/scripts/. I

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> Le 23/01/2014 17:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> >>> $$s is for the system directory. So to reach those scripts one could >>> do

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

Le 23/01/2014 06:27, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I've always used the full paths to scripts in converters, but I interpret the Customization manual to suggest that I only need to use the base name: Save it in your local LyX directory—say, /home/you/.lyx/scripts/pdfcopier.sh—and make it

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 23/01/2014 06:27, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I've always used the full paths to scripts in converters, but I interpret the Customization manual to suggest that I only need to use the base name: Save it in your

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

Le 23/01/2014 17:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : $$s is for the system directory. So to reach those scripts one could do $$s/scripts/. I don't believe there is a variable for the user scripts directory and it is this directory that I understand the Customization manual to suggest. Actually, the

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 23/01/2014 17:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : $$s is for the system directory. So to reach those scripts one could do $$s/scripts/. I don't believe there is a variable for the user scripts directory and it is

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

Le 23/01/2014 06:27, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I've always used the full paths to scripts in converters, but I interpret the Customization manual to suggest that I only need to use the base name: "Save it in your local LyX directory—say, /home/you/.lyx/scripts/pdfcopier.sh—and make it

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 23/01/2014 06:27, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> I've always used the full paths to scripts in converters, but I >> interpret the Customization manual to suggest that I only need to use >> the base name: >> >>

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

Le 23/01/2014 17:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : $$s is for the system directory. So to reach those scripts one could do $$s/scripts/. I don't believe there is a variable for the user scripts directory and it is this directory that I understand the Customization manual to suggest. Actually, the

Re: Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 23/01/2014 17:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> $$s is for the system directory. So to reach those scripts one could >> do $$s/scripts/. I don't believe there is a variable for the user >> scripts directory

Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

I've always used the full paths to scripts in converters, but I interpret the Customization manual to suggest that I only need to use the base name: Save it in your local LyX directory—say, /home/you/.lyx/scripts/pdfcopier.sh—and make it executable... enter pdfcopier.sh $$i $$o into the Copier

Is the user-dir/scripts folder added to PATH for converter script execution?

I've always used the full paths to scripts in converters, but I interpret the Customization manual to suggest that I only need to use the base name: "Save it in your local LyX directory—say, /home/you/.lyx/scripts/pdfcopier.sh—and make it executable... enter pdfcopier.sh $$i $$o into the Copier