> "Charles" == Charles de Miramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> Just a teaser. KCachegrind is a funny application with a lot
Charles> of buttons you can push.
It is really a teaser! The kcachegrind window is hidden.
JMarc
>> "cmiramon" == cmiramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> cmiramon> I have compiled yesterday svn lyx and ran it through
> cmiramon> cachegrind (start lyx, load tutorial, page down twice exit).
>
> Did you compile lyx with --disable-stdlib-debug and --disable-assertions?
>
> It seems to me th
> "cmiramon" == cmiramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
cmiramon> I have compiled yesterday svn lyx and ran it through
cmiramon> cachegrind (start lyx, load tutorial, page down twice exit).
Did you compile lyx with --disable-stdlib-debug and --disable-assertions?
It seems to me that you did no
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The few times I tried cachegrind, it was making lyx so slow that any
> testing concerning the GUI was too difficult to do. How do KDE people
> do it? Is there some documentation somewhere?
>
> It seems to me that oprofile is much faster.
>
It is slow but it works.
> "cmiramon" == cmiramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
cmiramon> Hello, I'm reading arguments to and fro about the fastness
cmiramon> of the new Qt4 frontend.
cmiramon> Just a question. Has someone tried Valgrind / Cachegrind /
cmiramon> KCachegrind on the Qt4 frontend and the last working Qt3
Hello,
I'm reading arguments to and fro about the fastness of the new Qt4 frontend.
Just a question. Has someone tried Valgrind / Cachegrind / KCachegrind on
the Qt4 frontend and the last working Qt3 frontend after the unicode
transition, and a 1.4 version ?
At least, it would give more scienti
