Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 26 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > | That is ok and it's not the point of the discussion. Will I be able to
| > | use M-m for math commands if I like so, even if that's not the default
| > | configuration?
| >
| > Yes, but the
> "Alejandro" == Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alejandro> What about Jurgen's suggestion on using something else for
Alejandro> the menu (M&ath and M-a) ?
I just did that in cvs.
JMarc
On 26 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | That is ok and it's not the point of the discussion. Will I be able to
> | use M-m for math commands if I like so, even if that's not the default
> | configuration?
>
> Yes, but then you can't have M-m to open the Math menu in the menubar.
What abo
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 23 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > I hope you realize that one of the reasons for our "great" flexibility
| > was a bug in XForms.
| >
| > Currently menu shortcuts are caught by _XForms_ not by LyX. This is
| > because of the
Juergen jestured,
> On 23-Sep-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'd lean towards either the M-a for math or eliminating the math menu
> > altogether. Probably the latter, as it strikes me that the whole
> > floating set of tools will be necessary when folks start working with
> > math. It
> "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Garst> I'll expand my earlier suggestion. Let menu shortcuts be
Garst> M-Uppercase letter bindings M-lowercase letter The menus all
Garst> start with an uppercase letter anyway.
I do not like this one much. I'll just put the math menu o
On 23-Sep-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'd lean towards either the M-a for math or eliminating the math menu
> altogether. Probably the latter, as it strikes me that the whole
> floating set of tools will be necessary when folks start working with
> math. It will also cause less proble
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Did you see my proposal to use M-capital-letters for menu shortcuts,
> which would leave M-m available for math key bindings.
> Would you find that acceptable?
>
> Marko observed:
> And LyX will be the only program I know to do that :). Actually, I
garst gabbed,
> > I'd label restoration of keybindings as a "must" before release.
> Did you see my proposal to use M-capital-letters for menu shortcuts,
> which would leave M-m available for math key bindings.
> Would you find that acceptable?
I *think* so, but in all honesty, I'd probably hav
On 23 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I hope you realize that one of the reasons for our "great" flexibility
> was a bug in XForms.
>
> Currently menu shortcuts are caught by _XForms_ not by LyX. This is
> because of the new menucode that is heaps better than the old one.
That is ok and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> lars lamented,
>
> > Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > | Yes, LyX had the hability to give users the choice to use the interface
> > | they liked the more. Is really necessary to take away that?
>
> > We won't take away _anything_ from the
lars lamented,
> Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Yes, LyX had the hability to give users the choice to use the interface
> | they liked the more. Is really necessary to take away that?
> We won't take away _anything_ from the user. The question is how LyX
> should be c
Marko Vendelin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
> > I'll expand my earlier suggestion.
> > Let menu shortcuts be M-Uppercase letter
> > bindings M-lowercase letter
> > The menus all start with an uppercase letter anyway.
> > When in math mode in particular I prefer not to
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> I'll expand my earlier suggestion.
> Let menu shortcuts be M-Uppercase letter
> bindings M-lowercase letter
> The menus all start with an uppercase letter anyway.
> When in math mode in particular I prefer not to have to resort to the
> menu and want
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | What has changed is that now, M-m invokes the math menu (like menu
> | work is most programs, BTW). This means that the "virtual menu
> | entries" we had in the math menu (and some others) are not possible
>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| What has changed is that now, M-m invokes the math menu (like menu
| work is most programs, BTW). This means that the "virtual menu
| entries" we had in the math menu (and some others) are not possible
| anymore. I think it is a good thing in ge
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
|
| > > Is the produced latex right? Why don't you use M-m C ?
| > It doesn't work anymore :( I assume you meant M-m (
|
| Yes, of course. I have not followed this thread but it seems that the
|
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 21 Sep 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
|
| > So, if we get rid of the math menu, should we keep the math bindings
| > on M-m? I think if we don't, there will be a riot from users, but Lars
| > disagrees...
|
| Yes, LyX had the hability
> "Alejandro" == Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alejandro> Yes, of course. I have not followed this thread but it
Alejandro> seems that the philosofy has changed. Users won't have
Alejandro> anymore the flexiblity to change the interface how ever
Alejandro> they like. Un
> Unless there are very good reasons for that, this is a shame.
Does anybody remember these 'very good reasons' exactly?
My memory is failing...
Andre'
--
Andre' Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > Is the produced latex right? Why don't you use M-m C ?
> It doesn't work anymore :( I assume you meant M-m (
Yes, of course. I have not followed this thread but it seems that the
philosofy has changed. Users won't have anymore the flexiblity to
ch
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
>
> On 21 Sep 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > So, if we get rid of the math menu, should we keep the math bindings
> > on M-m? I think if we don't, there will be a riot from users, but Lars
> > disagrees...
>
> Yes, LyX had the hability to give users the
On 21 Sep 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So, if we get rid of the math menu, should we keep the math bindings
> on M-m? I think if we don't, there will be a riot from users, but Lars
> disagrees...
Yes, LyX had the hability to give users the choice to use the interface
they liked the more.
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> But where would the "open math panel" command go?
At the same place as the TOC popup (so Eit for now).
Amir> If we do find places for these commands, I definitely think we
Amir> should get rid of the math menu. Because anyone who rea
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 05:27:04PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> We could have "Insert->Inline equation and "Insert->Displayed
> equation". Then we'd need a toggle somewhere between the two. The
> current situation (where M-m d is
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> How many people use the math menu for anything except opening
Amir> the Math Panel? I guess you could move that to Insert->Math.
Amir> Only problem is, what about Math Mode (put it in layout?) and
Amir> Display?
We could have "Insert-
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:47:52PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> I want
> Amir> *all* of my shortcuts to be Alt. Why? Because it's *much* easier
> Amir> to remember that way! Especially if you're talking about
> Amir> someth
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> I'll also note that noone created the layout.bind that Lars
Amir> suggested, so the paragraph layout stuff isn't there any more.
Amir> Nor are the character changing commands.
So, who will be brave enough to try to put all these back
Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| OK, maybe it's late for me to be getting into this discussion. But I just
| tried to play with the new LyX (now that I can compile it) and realized how
| annoying it was not to have the math bindings any more.
|
| I'll also note that noone created the la
OK, maybe it's late for me to be getting into this discussion. But I just
tried to play with the new LyX (now that I can compile it) and realized how
annoying it was not to have the math bindings any more.
I'll also note that noone created the layout.bind that Lars suggested, so
the paragraph lay
30 matches
Mail list logo
