Yves == Yves Bastide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yves Here is a second patch for building 1.1.6fix with gcc 3.0. This
Yves one should be less bad :)
I applied it. Thanks.
JMarc
> "Yves" == Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yves> Here is a second patch for building 1.1.6fix with gcc 3.0. This
Yves> one should be less bad :)
I applied it. Thanks.
JMarc
Yves == Yves Bastide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yves Here is a second patch for building 1.1.6fix with gcc 3.0. This
Yves one should be less bad :)
This looks very good to me. So, unless Lars objects, I'll apply it.
JMarc
> "Yves" == Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yves> Here is a second patch for building 1.1.6fix with gcc 3.0. This
Yves> one should be less bad :)
This looks very good to me. So, unless Lars objects, I'll apply it.
JMarc
On 07-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I just fixed that... Jürgen added something to a file that he
shouldn't have...
I'll commit in a little bit.
Sorry you're right! Hopefully you can fix it for all of us.
Jürgen
--
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 07-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| I just fixed that... Jürgen added something to a file that he
| shouldn't have...
|
| I'll commit in a little bit.
|
| Sorry you're right! Hopefully you can fix it for all of us.
If your
On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
If your --with-included-string does not work you have to tell the
errors.
Well the errors are easy. LString does not define __BASTRING__ and so the
BOOST_NO_LIMITS is not defined. As I don't have a limits on my RedHat 7.1
system the #include limits
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| If your --with-included-string does not work you have to tell the
| errors.
|
| Well the errors are easy. LString does not define __BASTRING__ and so the
| BOOST_NO_LIMITS is not defined. As I don't have
On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| If your --with-included-string does not work you have to tell the
| errors.
|
| Well the errors are easy. LString does not define __BASTRING__ and so the
|
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| |
| | If your --with-included-string does not work you have to tell the
| | errors.
| |
| | Well the errors are
On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
And the end of the configure script there should be a
#ifndef HAVE_LIMITS
#define BOOST_NO_LIMITS
#endif
are you missing that?
Yes I'm missing this one! Shouldn't that be too in config.h.in? It's missing
there to!
| One more thing limits !=
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| And the end of the configure script there should be a
|
| #ifndef HAVE_LIMITS
| #define BOOST_NO_LIMITS
| #endif
|
| are you missing that?
|
| Yes I'm missing this one! Shouldn't that be too in
On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
hmm... autogen.sh should take care of this...
Well I more or less never run ./autogen.sh, I'll try if that helps!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL
Yves == Yves Bastide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yves Here's a patch; I finally didn't try to go and test the kde and
Yves gnome frontends, since the versions of the libraries I have are
Yves themselves to-be-cleaned.
I do not like much the lstring.h solution... How come the main branch
does not
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:36:10PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Yves == Yves Bastide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yves Here's a patch; I finally didn't try to go and test the kde and
Yves gnome frontends, since the versions of the libraries I have are
Yves themselves to-be-cleaned.
I
Here is a second patch for building 1.1.6fix with gcc 3.0. This one
should be less bad :)
--
Yves
std-try2.patch.gz
On 07-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I just fixed that... Jürgen added something to a file that he
> shouldn't have...
>
> I'll commit in a little bit.
Sorry you're right! Hopefully you can fix it for all of us.
Jürgen
--
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 07-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > I just fixed that... Jürgen added something to a file that he
| > shouldn't have...
| >
| > I'll commit in a little bit.
|
| Sorry you're right! Hopefully you can fix it for all of us.
If your
On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> If your --with-included-string does not work you have to tell the
> errors.
Well the errors are easy. LString does not define __BASTRING__ and so the
BOOST_NO_LIMITS is not defined. As I don't have a on my RedHat 7.1
system the #include then fails!
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > If your --with-included-string does not work you have to tell the
| > errors.
|
| Well the errors are easy. LString does not define __BASTRING__ and so the
| BOOST_NO_LIMITS is not defined. As I don't
On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>|
>| > If your --with-included-string does not work you have to tell the
>| > errors.
>|
>| Well the errors are easy. LString does not define __BASTRING__ and
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| >| On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >|
| >| > If your --with-included-string does not work you have to tell the
| >| > errors.
| >|
| >| Well
On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And the end of the configure script there should be a
>
>#ifndef HAVE_LIMITS
>#define BOOST_NO_LIMITS
>#endif
>
> are you missing that?
Yes I'm missing this one! Shouldn't that be too in config.h.in? It's missing
there to!
>| One more thing !=
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > And the end of the configure script there should be a
| >
| >#ifndef HAVE_LIMITS
| >#define BOOST_NO_LIMITS
| >#endif
| >
| > are you missing that?
|
| Yes I'm missing this one! Shouldn't that be too
On 08-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> hmm... autogen.sh should take care of this...
Well I more or less never run ./autogen.sh, I'll try if that helps!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL
> "Yves" == Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yves> Here's a patch; I finally didn't try to go and test the kde and
Yves> gnome frontends, since the versions of the libraries I have are
Yves> themselves to-be-cleaned.
I do not like much the lstring.h solution... How come the main
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:36:10PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Yves" == Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Yves> Here's a patch; I finally didn't try to go and test the kde and
> Yves> gnome frontends, since the versions of the libraries I have are
> Yves> themselves
Here is a second patch for building 1.1.6fix with gcc 3.0. This one
should be less bad :)
--
Yves
std-try2.patch.gz
It seems that another number of std:: or using std:: are needed to compile
LyX 1.1.6 with GCC 3.0 or other modern compilers.
I guess that, in .C files, the preferred way is to use
#ifndef CXX_GLOBAL_CSTD
using std::strlen;
...
#endif
But what about header files? Is The Right Thing, such as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
| It seems that another number of std:: or using std:: are needed to compile
| LyX 1.1.6 with GCC 3.0 or other modern compilers.
|
| I guess that, in .C files, the preferred way is to use
|
| #ifndef CXX_GLOBAL_CSTD
| using std::strlen;
| ...
| #endif
|
Yves == Yves Bastide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yves It seems that another number of std:: or using std:: are needed
Yves to compile LyX 1.1.6 with GCC 3.0 or other modern compilers.
Yes, a patch to do that would be welcome.
Yves I guess that, in .C files, the preferred way is to use
Yves
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:36:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Yves == Yves Bastide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yves It seems that another number of std:: or using std:: are needed
Yves to compile LyX 1.1.6 with GCC 3.0 or other modern compilers.
Yes, a patch to do that would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
| On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:36:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| Yves == Yves Bastide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Yves It seems that another number of std:: or using std:: are needed
| Yves to compile LyX 1.1.6 with GCC 3.0 or other
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:23:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
[about patches for gcc 3.0]
I wonder why you have to change anything at all... I am compilig with
gcc 3.0 all the and have commited all the changes I needed to
compile...
Are you
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:01:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
| On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:23:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
| [about patches for gcc 3.0]
|
| I wonder why you have to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
| On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:23:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
| [about patches for gcc 3.0]
|
| I wonder why you have to change anything at all... I am compilig with
| gcc 3.0 all the and have
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
devel...
and I figure you are taling bout the 1.1.6 branch... ok
--
Lgb
Today I get numerous errors in .../boost/detail
Here's a sample:
../../boost/boost/detail/limits.hpp:369: redefinition of `class
std::numeric_limitsfloat'
Garst R. Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| devel...
|
| and I figure you are taling bout the 1.1.6 branch... ok
|
| --
| Lgb
| Today I get numerous errors in .../boost/detail
I just fixed that... Jürgen added something to a file that he
shouldn't
It seems that another number of std:: or using std:: are needed to compile
LyX 1.1.6 with GCC 3.0 or other modern compilers.
I guess that, in .C files, the preferred way is to use
#ifndef CXX_GLOBAL_CSTD
using std::strlen;
...
#endif
But what about header files? Is The Right Thing, such as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
| It seems that another number of std:: or using std:: are needed to compile
| LyX 1.1.6 with GCC 3.0 or other modern compilers.
|
| I guess that, in .C files, the preferred way is to use
|
| #ifndef CXX_GLOBAL_CSTD
| using std::strlen;
| ...
| #endif
|
> "Yves" == Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yves> It seems that another number of std:: or using std:: are needed
Yves> to compile LyX 1.1.6 with GCC 3.0 or other modern compilers.
Yes, a patch to do that would be welcome.
Yves> I guess that, in .C files, the preferred way is to
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:36:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Yves" == Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Yves> It seems that another number of std:: or using std:: are needed
> Yves> to compile LyX 1.1.6 with GCC 3.0 or other modern compilers.
>
> Yes, a patch to do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
| On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:36:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| > > "Yves" == Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > Yves> It seems that another number of std:: or using std:: are needed
| > Yves> to compile LyX 1.1.6 with GCC 3.0
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:23:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
[about patches for gcc 3.0]
>
> I wonder why you have to change anything at all... I am compilig with
> gcc 3.0 all the and have commited all the changes I needed to
> compile...
Are
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:01:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
>
> | On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:23:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
> | [about patches for gcc 3.0]
> | >
> | > I wonder why you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
| On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:23:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Bastide) writes:
| [about patches for gcc 3.0]
| >
| > I wonder why you have to change anything at all... I am compilig with
| > gcc 3.0 all the and have
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> devel...
>
> and I figure you are taling bout the 1.1.6 branch... ok
>
> --
> Lgb
Today I get numerous errors in .../boost/detail
Here's a sample:
../../boost/boost/detail/limits.hpp:369: redefinition of `class
std::numeric_limits'
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > devel...
| >
| > and I figure you are taling bout the 1.1.6 branch... ok
| >
| > --
| > Lgb
| Today I get numerous errors in .../boost/detail
I just fixed that... Jürgen added something to a file that he
48 matches
Mail list logo
