Re: LyX 1.4.0 on Windows

2006-03-26 Thread Enrico Forestieri
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ...> writes: > > Enrico> my reading of it is that you need the three compilations only > > Enrico> if you want an internationalized iconv program, i.e., if you > > Enrico> want translated messages from iconv. I personally think th

Re: LyX 1.4.0 on Windows

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Gerz
Angus Leeming wrote: Do the autotools work for you, or are you just being thorough? I am just thorough :-) Michael

Re: LyX 1.4.0 on Windows

2006-03-21 Thread Enrico Forestieri
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ...> writes: > > Enrico> my reading of it is that you need the three compilations only > > Enrico> if you want an internationalized iconv program, i.e., if you > > Enrico> want translated messages from iconv. I personally think th

Re: LyX 1.4.0 on Windows

2006-03-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Enrico> my reading of it is that you need the three compilations only > Enrico> if you want an internationalized iconv program, i.e., if you > Enrico> want translated messages from iconv. I personally think that > Enrico> building libiconv with --d

Re: LyX 1.4.0 on Windows

2006-03-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Enrico> my reading of it is that you need the three compilations only Enrico> if you want an internationalized iconv program, i.e., if you Enrico> want translated messages from iconv. I personally think that Enrico> building libiconv

Re: LyX 1.4.0 on Windows

2006-03-20 Thread Angus Leeming
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > if you are referring to this excerpt from the libiconv README: ... > my reading of it is that you need the three compilations only if you want > an internationalized iconv program, i.e., if you want translated messages > from iconv. I personally thi

Re: LyX 1.4.0 on Windows

2006-03-20 Thread Enrico Forestieri
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, I've read 'em. I can see that the thing compiles, but my reading of the > libiconv/gettext installation notes is that you need a third compilation: > > * make, make install gettext > * make, make install libiconv > * make, make install gettext > >

Re: LyX 1.4.0 on Windows

2006-03-20 Thread Angus Leeming
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dear Angus, > > believe or not: I am still working on INSTALL.Win32! :) > Now that we no longer rely on the msbitfields flag, I tested whether > getext (0.14.5) and libiconv (1.10) can be built with MinGW. Surprise, > surprise, compilation works p

LyX 1.4.0 on Windows

2006-03-20 Thread Michael Gerz
Dear Angus, believe or not: I am still working on INSTALL.Win32! Now that we no longer rely on the msbitfields flag, I tested whether getext (0.14.5) and libiconv (1.10) can be built with MinGW. Surprise, surprise, compilation works perfectly (see attachment for compile instructions) Unfort