On 2009-03-07, rgheck wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
>> On Friday 06 March 2009 13:57:34 Guenter Milde wrote:
>> This would be moot if the paragraph had some kind of special markup, like:
>> \begin{standard}
>> ...
>> \end{standard}
>> or even
>> \standard{...} if you prefer.
Thinking about it, I
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 06 March 2009 13:57:34 Guenter Milde wrote:
But it really is:
like a footnote, the float definition can be inside a
paragraph while the output is moved to a different place by the tex
engine.
You can even see the difference:
* when you put the float inset i
On 2009-03-06, José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 06 March 2009 13:57:34 Guenter Milde wrote:
>> like a footnote, the float definition can be inside a
>> paragraph while the output is moved to a different place by the tex
>> engine.
>> You can even see the difference:
>> * when you put the float i
Kaplinsky"
To: lyx-de...@oak-tree.us, lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 11:32:44 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain
Subject: Re: LyX Outliner and Corkboard - Feature Proposal
Ideally, the tool for organizing one's ideas before and during writing,
would enable the user
On Friday 06 March 2009 13:57:34 Guenter Milde wrote:
> But it really is:
>
> like a footnote, the float definition can be inside a
> paragraph while the output is moved to a different place by the tex
> engine.
>
> You can even see the difference:
>
> * when you put the float inset into its o
Ideally, the tool for organizing one's ideas before and during writing,
would enable the user to choose between an outline mode and a mind map
mode. Mind mapping tools such as xmind allow you to drag and drop your
various topics/concepts in order to modify their order and hierarchy on
the fly.
On 2009-03-06, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> If I understand the corkboard approach, you start by writing random notes,
> an outline of your ideas, etc... Then you can shuffle it and link it and
> then you start to write your document.
But this can already be done with Branches:
* Put your ideas i
On 2009-03-06, José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 06 March 2009 09:08:37 Guenter Milde wrote:
>> I'd rather like to see the difference made clear.
>> Layouts are "block elements", you cannot have two layouts in one
>> paragraph.
>> Insets are "inline elements" (even if they sometimes contain block
>>
Charles de Miramon writes:
> If I understand the corkboard approach, you start by writing random notes,
> an outline of your ideas, etc... Then you can shuffle it and link it and
> then you start to write your document.
I'll have to read about it, then/
JMatc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> rgheck writes:
>
>> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>>> 2. implement the possibility to add comments to the outliner items.
>>> As Helge wrote, these will need to be stored in the document (as
>>> specific properties). I suppose this would be much easier to
>>> implement
On Friday 06 March 2009 09:08:37 Guenter Milde wrote:
> I'd rather like to see the difference made clear.
>
> Layouts are "block elements", you cannot have two layouts in one
> paragraph.
>
> Insets are "inline elements" (even if they sometimes contain block
> elements.
No they are not. It is not
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
| a bit like XML :-)
I clearly remember who helped shoot that one down.
Hmm, I feel a nice Friday thread brewing.
Usual suspects: me or André?
Abdel.
Guenter Milde writes:
> I'd rather like to see the difference made clear.
>
> Layouts are "block elements", you cannot have two layouts in one
> paragraph.
>
> Insets are "inline elements" (even if they sometimes contain block
> elements.
Yes, and HTML shows well this distinction. However, I hav
On 2009-03-06, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> rgheck schreef:
>>> This is the same issue as with InsetOptArg. It shouldn't be an inset.
>>> It's a layout feature.
>>> Richard
>> That's why I would like to see this difference to disappear.
I'd rather like to see the
lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> Abdelrazak Younes writes:
> | a bit like XML :-)
>
> I clearly remember who helped shoot that one down.
Hmm, I feel a nice Friday thread brewing.
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
| a bit like XML :-)
I clearly remember who helped shoot that one down.
--
Lgb
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
rgheck schreef:
This is the same issue as with InsetOptArg. It shouldn't be an inset.
It's a layout feature.
Richard
That's why I would like to see this difference to disappear. Why is a
note an Inset and the title an layout ? Why is a branch an inset and
the a
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-03-05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
We can just show the contents of notes that are in the section
paragraphs.
This is what I had in mind too.
Or have a 'show in outline' option if you prefer.
I'd prefer a "show summary/notes" toggle in the out
On 2009-03-05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>We can just show the contents of notes that are in the section
> paragraphs.
This is what I had in mind too.
> Or have a 'show in outline' option if you prefer.
I'd prefer a "show summary/notes" toggle in the outliner instead.
Günter
rgheck schreef:
This is the same issue as with InsetOptArg. It shouldn't be an inset.
It's a layout feature.
Richard
That's why I would like to see this difference to disappear. Why is a
note an Inset and the title an layout ? Why is a branch an inset and the
abstract a layout ? Why do we ha
rgheck writes:
> You could do that, but the problem with that kind of solution, as I
> see it, is that you then have to keep the note insets in the right
> place. This is the same issue as with InsetOptArg. It shouldn't be an
> inset. It's a layout feature.
But it is a _note_. And if it makes se
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
rgheck writes:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2. implement the possibility to add comments to the outliner items.
As Helge wrote, these will need to be stored in the document (as
specific properties). I suppose this would be much easier to
implement after LyX's
rgheck writes:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> 2. implement the possibility to add comments to the outliner items.
>> As Helge wrote, these will need to be stored in the document (as
>> specific properties). I suppose this would be much easier to
>> implement after LyX's file format switched to XM
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2. implement the possibility to add comments to the outliner items. As Helge
wrote, these will need to be stored in the document (as specific
properties). I suppose this would be much easier to implement after LyX's
file format switched to XML, something that is planne
Rob Oakes wrote:
> http://www.oak-tree.us/stuff/LyX-Proposal.pdf
Thanks, this is a an interesting paper. I think that your proposal is
overall compatible with LyX's approach, and I think LyX could be extended to
support at least many of your ideas.
The actual question now is: how to implement t
Rob Oakes wrote:
Dear Jürgen and other LyX Developers,
Thank you very much for the kind welcome. Pursuant to your advice, I have
gone through and tried to develop my thoughts on a few features that I would
be excited to develop and add to LyX. Because of dummy-layouts and a few
other graphi
Dear Jürgen and other LyX Developers,
Thank you very much for the kind welcome. Pursuant to your advice, I have
gone through and tried to develop my thoughts on a few features that I would
be excited to develop and add to LyX. Because of dummy-layouts and a few
other graphics I wasn't able to
27 matches
Mail list logo
