LyX for LaTeX-package writers

2006-02-07 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Hello LyXers, I got an interesting email from Henri Adriaens, a author of powerdot. He reports me his problems with the implementation of powerdot for LyX. I mean that they are interesting enough to talk about it to make life easier for package authors to provide a LyX layout file. Here is t

Re: LyX for LaTeX-package writers

2006-02-07 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 21:42 +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Hello LyXers, > > I got an interesting email from Henri Adriaens, a author of powerdot. He > reports me his problems with the implementation of powerdot for LyX. I > mean that they are interesting enough to talk about it to make life > easie

Re: LyX for LaTeX-package writers

2006-02-08 Thread Georg Baum
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Hello LyXers, > > I got an interesting email from Henri Adriaens, a author of powerdot. He > reports me his problems with the implementation of powerdot for LyX. I > mean that they are interesting enough to talk about it to make life > easier for package authors to provide a Ly

Re: LyX for LaTeX-package writers

2006-02-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Georg Baum wrote: I got an interesting email from Henri Adriaens, a author of powerdot. He reports me his problems with the implementation of powerdot for LyX. I mean that they are interesting enough to talk about it to make life easier for package authors to provide a LyX layout file. Here is

Re: LyX for LaTeX-package writers

2006-02-08 Thread Charles de Miramon
Martin Vermeer wrote: >> >> as be can just embed verbatim macros here. No dirty tricks and lots of >> slow, extra files needed. And all this trouble just because >> environments can't have arguments in lyx... Oh my dear... > > That would be easy to fix... > Would nested environments be very di

Re: LyX for LaTeX-package writers

2006-02-08 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:34:05AM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > >> > >> as be can just embed verbatim macros here. No dirty tricks and lots of > >> slow, extra files needed. And all this trouble just because > >> environments can't have arguments in lyx... Oh my de

Re: LyX for LaTeX-package writers

2006-02-08 Thread Jose' Matos
On Thursday 09 February 2006 06:18, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Methinks we already have it. See paragraph.C: > >     595 Paragraph::depth_type Paragraph::getMaxDepthAfter() const >     596 { >     597         if (layout()->isEnvironment()) >     598                 return params().depth() + 1; >     5

Re: LyX for LaTeX-package writers

2006-02-09 Thread Helge Hafting
Charles de Miramon wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: as be can just embed verbatim macros here. No dirty tricks and lots of slow, extra files needed. And all this trouble just because environments can't have arguments in lyx... Oh my dear... That would be easy to fix... Would nes