Re: One for André

2002-07-17 Thread Juergen Vigna
David Kastrup wrote: [sniped Emacs explanation] > Can't you overlay it? Are we talking about the text-cursor and not the mouse cursor? Well we have the really easy solution to give a bigger width to the outside world, this is all we have to do. We could however just add a default to the width, b

Re: One for André

2002-07-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:17:31AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Actually, it might be that putting the cursor on the preview will > open the preview and yo'll get the math editor, anyway. That's what's happening right now. Andre' > -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Secu

Re: One for André

2002-07-17 Thread David Kastrup
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > >>You need also some space between enclosing text and inset. I normally > >>add 2 pixels at each side to the width (see InsetText and/or > >>InsetTabular). > > As LaTeX does not add such space when changing into math mode I'd > >

Re: One for André

2002-07-17 Thread David Kastrup
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:45:42AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > You need also some space between enclosing text and inset. I normally > > add 2 pixels at each side to the width (see InsetText and/or > > InsetTabular). > > As LaTeX does not add such

Re: One for André

2002-07-17 Thread Juergen Vigna
Andre Poenitz wrote: >>You need also some space between enclosing text and inset. I normally >>add 2 pixels at each side to the width (see InsetText and/or >>InsetTabular). > > > As LaTeX does not add such space when changing into math mode I'd rather > don't do it on screen either. Well you'll

Re: One for André

2002-07-16 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:45:42AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > You need also some space between enclosing text and inset. I normally > add 2 pixels at each side to the width (see InsetText and/or > InsetTabular). As LaTeX does not add such space when changing into math mode I'd rather don't do

Re: One for André

2002-07-16 Thread Juergen Vigna
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 06:18:00PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > >>Ok, understood. Since this box is not present in Preview display, I'll remove >>the extras then. > > > Ok. You need also some space between enclosing text and inset. I normally add 2 pixels at each side

Re: One for André

2002-07-16 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 06:18:00PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Ok, understood. Since this box is not present in Preview display, I'll remove > the extras then. Ok. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Je

Re: One for André

2002-07-16 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 16 July 2002 6:31 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 06:06:20PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > André, > > why do we add 1 to ascent, descent and then remove them when calling the > > painter? > > The pink "active mathed" box? > > > Similarly, why do we arbitrarily remov

Re: One for André

2002-07-16 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 06:06:20PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > André, > why do we add 1 to ascent, descent and then remove them when calling the > painter? The pink "active mathed" box? > Similarly, why do we arbitrarily remove 2 from the width passed to the > painter? Similarly? Andre'

One for André

2002-07-16 Thread Angus Leeming
André, why do we add 1 to ascent, descent and then remove them when calling the painter? Similarly, why do we arbitrarily remove 2 from the width passed to the painter? Angus int InsetFormula::ascent(BufferView *, LyXFont const &) const { return preview_->usePreview() ?