On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:08:07PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Juergen> On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> >> It probably should... but we have not made any guarantees with
> >> 1.2.0 towards 1.1.5.
>
> Juerg
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I do think too that it is one. But you know italian, don't you?
>> This was for this that I suggested you could take a look, for for
>> your hacking skills.
Juergen> And for what
On 18-Apr-2002 John Levon wrote:
>> Cells touch by the cursor get a red box (which is ok) but retain it even
>> after the cursor left. Nothing serious, but 'unexpected'.
>
> Argh argh regression regression :)
#:O)
> Why does this bug haunt us so ...
Maybe because we the implementation is not
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:55:01PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Cells touch by the cursor get a red box (which is ok) but retain it even
> after the cursor left. Nothing serious, but 'unexpected'.
Argh argh regression regression :)
Why does this bug haunt us so ...
regards
john
--
"Be advis
On 18-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> One item is:
>
> - new doc
> - click on table toolbar entry to create 'standard table'
> - move cursor around in the cell
>
> Cells touch by the cursor get a red box (which is ok) but retain it even
> after the cursor left. Nothing serious, but 'une
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:49:30PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > After all I was answering to one of Lars' mails...
>
> You are complaining about missbehaviour but cannot give real points as long
> as you do this for mathed I don't care, but when you bring tabulars in the
> discussion I at leas
On 18-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:13:10PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> I cannot do anything with "feelings" (didn't I tell this already today) and
>> I learned to not care for them if people cannot give me facts for them!
>
> You should practise "not caring" a bi
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:13:10PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I cannot do anything with "feelings" (didn't I tell this already today) and
> I learned to not care for them if people cannot give me facts for them!
You should practise "not caring" a bit.
After all I was answering to one of Lars'
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I do think too that it is one. But you know italian, don't you? This
> was for this that I suggested you could take a look, for for your
> hacking skills.
And for what should I look exactly? Anyway it seems really bad for me to
edit lyxfiles by hand
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> And I cannot read it without errors with 1.1.6 so it seems to
Juergen> me that this is a manually edited file!
I do think too that it is one. But you know italian, don't you? This
was for this that I suggested you could take a
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:44:01AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> It probably should... but we have not made any guarantees with 1.2.0
> towards 1.1.5.
We have - UPGRADING
regards
john
--
"Be advised. Your bedroom may quietly detach from the house while you sleep."
- Sarah Bee
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 09:29:59AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> If you think my recent changes only added more bugs to lyx then I miss the
> bug reports on LyXBugs. I've only seen decrease the bugs. Now as Allan told
Yes but the risk is replacing a mis-drawing with a crash, and we don't
find ou
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> Hmm well strange enough someone change it_Tutorial already. I
> Juergen> did a update recently and now the top of it_Tutorial tells
> Juergen> us:
>
> I said it_Customization.lyx.
Oops ;), well then it is surely no 1.1.5 file as 1.1.5 had
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen> I would say now just convert them, going over a 1.1.5 format
Juergen> to be sure! If you don't have 1.1.5 anymore I can do it if
Juergen> you want.
>> Yes, please do!
Juerg
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> I would say now just convert them, going over a 1.1.5 format
> Juergen> to be sure! If you don't have 1.1.5 anymore I can do it if
> Juergen> you want.
>
> Yes, please do!
Hmm well strange enough someone change it_Tutorial already. I did a
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| He changed all \\end_float to \\end_inset without changing the check for
>| this in other compatibility reads (say tabulars!).
>
> So was it a cosmetic bug, or a real one?
Hmm, well, I let you decide if you change the fileformat and then give it
to
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 18-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>> While investigating for the sk_??? read I saw that most probably the problem
>> lies in the mathed parser I will tell Andre when I see where, but for now I
>> saw just this (no bug just a bit strange handling)
>
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> So this is a very old file, but 1.1.6 can read it. Should I just
>> convert it, or does somebody want to investigate why it does not
>> work?
Juergen> I would say now just convert
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So this is a very old file, but 1.1.6 can read it. Should I just
> convert it, or does somebody want to investigate why it does not work?
I would say now just convert them, going over a 1.1.5 format to be sure!
If you don't have 1.1.5 anymore I can d
On 18-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> While investigating for the sk_??? read I saw that most probably the problem
> lies in the mathed parser I will tell Andre when I see where, but for now I
> saw just this (no bug just a bit strange handling)
Well it wasn't Andres, but Lars's fault #:O)
He
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 09:44:46AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I almost agree with this... but I want at least a prerelease where we
> have a larger group of people testing, and also a period of time where
> no patches are going in. I do not want to release 1.2.0 one day and
> 1.2.1 the ot
On 18-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
While investigating for the sk_??? read I saw that most probably the problem
lies in the mathed parser I will tell Andre when I see where, but for now I
saw just this (no bug just a bit strange handling)
In Parser::parse_into1() you check a lot of paterns on
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> No, just convert it. I do not want any more compability hack now
| Lars> to accomodate 1.1.5. (unless someone else bothers to look and
| Lars> discovers that it is really ea
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> No, just convert it. I do not want any more compability hack now
Lars> to accomodate 1.1.5. (unless someone else bothers to look and
Lars> discovers that it is really easy to fix.
Note that this particular case was 0.12!
JMar
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> It probably should... but we have not made any guarantees with
>> 1.2.0 towards 1.1.5.
Juergen> Well but we should! A lot of people did not change because of
Juergen> the problems
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> It probably should... but we have not made any guarantees with 1.2.0
> towards 1.1.5.
Well but we should! A lot of people did not change because of the problems
with tabulars in 1.1.6. I think we have to support at least 1.1.5 file format!
Jug
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So this is a very old file, but 1.1.6 can read it. Should I just
> convert it, or does somebody want to investigate why it does not work?
> Why doesn't lyx warn that this file format revision is not well
> supported anymore?
I was quite sure you did
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Jean-Marc> * sk_UserGuide.lyx
>
| Jean-Marc> This one is trickier:
>
| Jean-Marc> lapinot: ~/src/lyx/devbuild/src/lyx sk_UserGuide.lyx
| Jean-Marc> Solitary \end_inset. Miss
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> * sk_UserGuide.lyx
Jean-Marc> This one is trickier:
Jean-Marc> lapinot: ~/src/lyx/devbuild/src/lyx sk_UserGuide.lyx
Jean-Marc> Solitary \end_inset. Missing \begin_inset?. Last inset read
Jean-Marc> was: Formula LyX
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Some compability reading failing. Is the file correct in the first
> place? Does the file reading stop at this point or does it continue?
Well the first question coming to my mind is could the files be read with
1.1.6? If yes and we save them again in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 2808 fax\SpecialChar
| 2809 default o su -p
| 2810 \family default
| \bar default
| ayout\SpecialChar
| typewriter
| \emph on
| block
| \emph default
both of these just look illegal in the first place.
| I suspect this comes from so
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'll try to get a new prelease out today. (it is a but time consuming
> since I want to check that a lot of make targets work as expected.
> Especially clean and distclean. Also building where srcdir != builddir
> and srcdir == builddir must be checked
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> BTW.: As much as I've heard Jean-Marc couldn't convert 2 of
Juergen> our documents, so this should be a priority to fix first.
Juergen> What documents where that?
The relevant documents are
* it_Customization.lyx
lapinot: ~
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>| If you ask me we could just release it today! 1.2.0 is much more stable then
>>| 1.1.6 and has more features. So we could start 1.3.0 and Jean-Marc can trow
>>| away 1.1.6 and hack 1.2.0 for bugfixes ;)
>>
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| If you ask me we could just release it today! 1.2.0 is much more stable then
>| 1.1.6 and has more features. So we could start 1.3.0 and Jean-Marc can trow
>| away 1.1.6 and hack 1.2.0 for bugfixes ;)
>
> I almost agree with this... but I want at lea
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 17-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>| I have to admit I'm a bit worried about all this patching going on ...
>>>
>>| We've already had two or three new bugs come from your recent changes. I
>>| thought we wanted 1.2 to be released ??
>>
>> I
On 17-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I have to admit I'm a bit worried about all this patching going on ...
>>
>| We've already had two or three new bugs come from your recent changes. I
>| thought we wanted 1.2 to be released ??
>
> I can only say that the number of prereleases has bee
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 04:27:25PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >
> >> It is really small and does IMO the right thing. It only changes the row if
> >
> | I have to admit I'm a bit worried about all th
38 matches
Mail list logo
