> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> Many changes:
Applied.
JMarc
Many changes:
- It is no longer possible to choose between two or more ways to
export to some format (the new code uses only the shortest path).
However, it is still possible to choose between pdflatex/ps2pdf
for creating a PDF file, by defining two PDF formats: pdf & pdf2.
- Changed the token
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> Here is updated version of the patch, in which I've added the
Dekel> following:
I'll apply it.
JMarc
> "R" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> In principle, these dialogs should be file-extension sensitive
R> (tex: latex, nw: noweb etc.) but can be overwritten by choosing
R> from a button which lists the possible formats.
R> We may then even merge "File->Open" and "File->Import", if
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Here is updated version of the patch, in which I've...
I think it would be better to have two dialogs
as an Import-dialog and an Export-dialog.
In principle, these dialogs should be file-extension
sensitive (tex: latex, nw: noweb etc.) but can be
overwritten by choosing from
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 07:21:08PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> To solve these problems, I've created a patch in which a format is considered
> "dummy format" if its extension is empty (I think that this is better than
> having a flag that says that the ps->fax converter is dummy).
Here is update
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 02:21:31PM +0200, Baruch Even wrote:
> > The faxcommand is part of a GUI (which we now disabled) to send a fax
> > directly from lyx (File->Fax). What could be cute is if I can define
> > an exporter command Fax which for example calls "ksendfax file.ps".
>
> What prevents
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 03-Nov-2000 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > PS: Concerning the \faxcommand-question earlier today: Isn't it possible to
> > define an "converter" from .tex do ".fax" that produces the fax itself as
> > "sideeffect"? If that is true, there seems to be
On 03-Nov-2000 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> PS: Concerning the \faxcommand-question earlier today: Isn't it possible to
> define an "converter" from .tex do ".fax" that produces the fax itself as
> "sideeffect"? If that is true, there seems to be no need for some special
> \faxcommand option at all
> I haven't recieved feedback on this issue.
No? Well:
> Note that option (1) will simplify the code, without limiting its power.
Go for it.
> On the other hand, the definition of two PDF format might be a bit confusing
> to the user.
That's not worth the additional complexity. Keep it as sim
On Fri, 03 Nov 2000, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 08:59:24PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > I do want that when exporting to PDF, the user will be able to choose
> > > between tex->pdf (pdflatex), or tex->dvi->ps->pdf.
> > > This is currently the only case when having two choices is
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 08:59:24PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > I do want that when exporting to PDF, the user will be able to choose between
> > tex->pdf (pdflatex), or tex->dvi->ps->pdf.
> > This is currently the only case when having two choices is desired.
> > So maybe we just need to mark the
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 11:45:32PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 11:24:42PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > > 2. Previously, when you had a linuxdoc document, in the view/export menus
> > > contained "HTML (using sgml2html)" AND "HTML (using tth)" (i.e. using the chain
> > > li
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> Again, an updated version of the patch. This time, the I've
Dekel> added a new feature to the patch: I've replaced the old import
Dekel> code by a new code that uses the converter code, so it is now
Dekel> possible for example to impo
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 11:24:42PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > 1. The patch adds a distinction between format name and extension.
> > Using the \format lyxrc tag we can define in lyxrc
> >
> > #name extension "pretty name"
> > \Format linuxdoc
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Here is a "make Jose happy" patch:
>
> 1. The patch adds a distinction between format name and extension.
> Using the \format lyxrc tag we can define in lyxrc
>
> #name extension "pretty name"
> \Format linuxdoc sgml Linuxdoc
> \Format docbook
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> And yet another updated version of the patch.
Again, an updated version of the patch.
This time, the I've added a new feature to the patch:
I've replaced the old import code by a new code that uses the converter code,
so it is now po
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 12:52:15AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 12:10:01AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > Here is a "make Jose happy" patch:
>
> Here is an update patch (few minor fixes).
>
And yet another updated version of the patch.
patch.gz
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 12:10:01AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Here is a "make Jose happy" patch:
Here is an update patch (few minor fixes).
patch.gz
Here is a "make Jose happy" patch:
1. The patch adds a distinction between format name and extension.
Using the \format lyxrc tag we can define in lyxrc
#name extension "pretty name"
\Format linuxdoc sgml Linuxdoc
\Format docbook sgml Docbook
etc.
2. Previously, when you had a lin
20 matches
Mail list logo
