Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-21 Thread Stephan Witt
I've prepared a patch as compromise proposal for the new key bindings... The math-macro fold/unfold keys has to be changed to allow the configuration of the key-binding of Ctrl-plus. To remain consistent I moved them to Ctrl-Shift- plus/minus resp. asterisk/underscore. I think they are used rarel

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-22 Thread BH
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > I've prepared a patch as compromise proposal for the new key bindings... > The math-macro fold/unfold keys has to be changed to allow the configuration > of the key-binding of Ctrl-plus. > To remain consistent I moved them to Ctrl-Shift- plus

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-22 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 22.07.2010 um 15:03 schrieb BH: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> I've prepared a patch as compromise proposal for the new key bindings... >> The math-macro fold/unfold keys has to be changed to allow the configuration >> of the key-binding of Ctrl-plus. >> To remain c

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-22 Thread BH
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 22.07.2010 um 15:03 schrieb BH: >> One typo in lyxrc.dist.in, though: >> >> +\scroll_whell_zoom "off" > > This was intentional. It solves the issues with momentum scroll. I agree with the change. I was pointing out the typo: "whell" rather

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-22 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 22.07.2010 um 16:01 schrieb BH: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 22.07.2010 um 15:03 schrieb BH: >>> One typo in lyxrc.dist.in, though: >>> >>> +\scroll_whell_zoom "off" >> >> This was intentional. It solves the issues with momentum scroll. > > I agree with the c

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-22 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:49:35PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 22.07.2010 um 15:03 schrieb BH: > > > A further simple change you might want to make for Mac (so that LyX > > can find the appropriate location of .lyxpipe*): > > > > Index: development/MacOSX/lyxeditor > > ===

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-22 Thread BH
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:49:35PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 22.07.2010 um 15:03 schrieb BH: >> >> > A further simple change you might want to make for Mac (so that LyX >> > can find the appropriate location of .lyxpipe*): >> > >>

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-22 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 22.07.2010 um 21:50 schrieb BH: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:49:35PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 22.07.2010 um 15:03 schrieb BH: >>> A further simple change you might want to make for Mac (so that LyX can find the ap

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-22 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:50:00PM -0400, BH wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:49:35PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > >> Am 22.07.2010 um 15:03 schrieb BH: > >> > >> > A further simple change you might want to make for Mac (so that LyX

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-26 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 22.07.2010 um 23:17 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 22.07.2010 um 21:50 schrieb BH: > >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:49:35PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 22.07.2010 um 15:03 schrieb BH: > A further simple change you might

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-26 Thread BH
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > I cannot get it to work with Skim. Is it possible to simplify the setting? > > I don't understand the idea of the lookup of a configure option in a file > with unknown location. > Possibly, there should be another way to interlink LyX and vie

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-26 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 26.07.2010 um 23:10 schrieb BH: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> I cannot get it to work with Skim. Is it possible to simplify the setting? >> >> I don't understand the idea of the lookup of a configure option in a file >> with unknown location. >> Possibly, there sh

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-27 Thread BH
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 26.07.2010 um 23:10 schrieb BH: > >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> I cannot get it to work with Skim. Is it possible to simplify the setting? >>> >>> I don't understand the idea of the lookup of a configure optio

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-27 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 27.07.2010 um 14:18 schrieb BH: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 26.07.2010 um 23:10 schrieb BH: >> >>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: I cannot get it to work with Skim. Is it possible to simplify the setting? I don't understa

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

2010-07-27 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 27.07.2010 um 15:42 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 27.07.2010 um 14:18 schrieb BH: > >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 26.07.2010 um 23:10 schrieb BH: >>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > I cannot get it to work with Skim. Is it possib